DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

생태·자연도 이의신청지역의 원인 분석

The Analysis on Causes of Areas with Public Appeals to the Ecosystem and Nature Map

  • 정태준 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 송일배 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 이지선 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 이성제 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 조광진 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 송교홍 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 김기동 (국립생태원 경영관리실) ;
  • 차진열 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 조장삼 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 임효선 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실) ;
  • 정해정 (국립생태원 생태평가연구실)
  • Jung, Tae-Jun (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Song, Il-Bae (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Seon (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Je (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Cho, Kwang-Jin (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Song, Kyo-Hong (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Dong (Division of Administrative Management, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Cha, Jin-Yeol (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Cho, Jang-Sam (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Leem, Hyosun (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Joung, Hae-Joung (Division of Ecological Assessment, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.17
  • 심사 : 2017.01.06
  • 발행 : 2017.02.28

초록

The objective of this study is to seek for improvement measures to make the Ecosystem and Nature Map by analyzing causes for grade changes and distributional characteristics of areas with public objections to the Ecosystem and Nature Map notified by e-official gazette from 2014 to June 2016. The receipt of public appeals has been recently increased from average 23 cases a year(2007-2013) to average 33 cases a year(2014-June 2016) while there were 42 areas with public appeals for less than the minimum area($62,500m^2$) for the evaluation of grade of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. Most of the public appeals focused on the 1st grade zone of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. Before grade changes by public appeals, the 1st grade zone of the Ecosystem and Nature Map were 76.0% of the whole areas with public appeals. However, after grade changes by public appeals, it was rapidly decreased to 25.2%, which means that a lot of the 1st grade zone with public appeals were lowered. In the results of analyzing the distributional characteristics of areas with public appeals, they were mostly distributed in lowland(less than 250m altitude), section with $10{\sim}20^{\circ}$ slope, and areas close to or within 100m from built-up area. Regarding areas with public appeals, the biggest time difference between the period of the existing research by National Ecosystem Survey and the period of notice after completing the treatment of public appeals was 18 years while areas showing 6-15 years of time difference were about 70%. Thus, there were huge differences in time of research and notice. Also, the biggest causes for grade changes were boundary errors caused by small-scale survey, and then followed by changes in evaluation of endangered species and occurrence of built-up area and damaged land. Analyzing areas with public appeals in each evaluation item of the Ecosystem and Nature Map, vegetation part was 73.0%, and endangered species area was 23.1% while topography and wetland was less.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn KH . Shin YK . Kim JY . Lee YK . Lim J C . Ha JW . Kwon HS . Suh JH and Kim MJ. 2015. A Review on the Public Appeals of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. J. Environ. Im- pact Assess. 24(1): 99-109. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.1.99
  2. Choung HL. 2008. Development Plan of Mapping of Actual Vegetation for Improving the Accuracy of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. Environment Forum. 12(4): 1-8. (in Korean)
  3. Hudson, G. Donald. 1936. The Unit area method of land classification. Annals of the A.A.G.. 26(2): 99-112.
  4. Jeon SW. 2001. A Study on Remote Sensing Technique for Mapping of the Ecosystem and Nature Map(III). Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  5. Jeon SW . Cho JG and Jung HC. 2000. A Study on Remote Sensing Technique for Mapping of the Ecosystem and Nature Map(III): Focusing on Mapping of Wetland Classification Around River. Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  6. Jeon SW and Jung HC. 1999. A Study on Remote Sensing Technique for Mapping of the Ecosystem and Nature Map(II). Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  7. Jeon SW and Jung SM. 1998. A Study on Remote Sensing Technique for Mapping of the Ecosystem and Nature Map(I). Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  8. Kim JS . Jung TJ and Hong SH. 2015. Biotope Type Classification based on the Vegetation Community in Built-up Area. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 29(3): 454-461. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2015.29.3.454
  9. Lee JS. 2007. A Study on Advancing Strategy for National Environmental Geographic Informations- Focused on the National Environmental Assessment Map, Ecological Map and Land Cover Map-. Journal of Environmental Policy. 6(2): 97-122. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.17330/joep.6.2.200706.97
  10. Lee KS. Jo HR. 2000. The Gradient Analysis of the Korean Peninsula by using DEM. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 3(1): 35-43. (in Korean with English summary)
  11. Ministry of Environment. 2004. Application of Vegetation Class in Use of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. (in Korean)
  12. Ministry of Environment. 2015. 3rd. General Plan for Conservation of Natural Environment (2016-2025). (in Korean)
  13. National Institute of Ecology. 2015. Guideline of 2015 National Ecosystem Survey. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean)
  14. Shin YC, Min DK. 2005. Estimating the economic value of first-grade Area in Ecological Nature Status. Environmental and Resource Economic Review, 14(1),25-52. (in Korean)

피인용 문헌

  1. 생태자연도 등급 하락에 영향을 미치는 인위적 토지피복 변화 분석 vol.22, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2019.22.6.77