Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of ALP Model-Applied Science Class on Elementary Students' Scientific Communication Skills

ALP 모형을 적용한 과학 수업이 초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2017.11.21
  • Accepted : 2017.12.12
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to analyze the merits and limits of flipped learning by suggesting the ALP model for efficient application and to test the effects of the new ALP model. The process of new model and program development is based on ADDIE in this study. This study consists of two steps. First through literature research on the difficulties of the flipped learning, the elements are extracted to develop new model. Second, these elements were placed according to the teaching and learning flow, which resulted in the procedures. As a result, the ALP model was developed. The ALP model is a new model for applying teaching and learning methods for efficient application of the flipped learning. This model was applied to elementary science classes to test its effects in scientific communication skill. Interviews and cognitive survey were also conducted to collect additional information. The results of this study are as follows: There were various difficulties in flipped learning. Based on literature research results, the ALP model and the science programs for elementary students have been developed. The experimental group showed statistically meaningful improvement in scientific communication skill. The scientific communication skill has two subcategories: the forms and the types. According to the form analysis results, the experimental group showed a statistically meaningful improvement in the form of Table and Picture, but not in the form of Writing and Number. With the same reason given previously, this study confirmed that the application of ALP model improves the students' visual form communication skills such as Table and Picture better than reading form communication skills such as Writing and Number. According to the type analysis results, the experimental group showed a statistically meaningful improvement in "the scientific insistence" type, and "the justification" which is the sub element of "the scientific insistence" type. With this reason, this study suggests that the class applied ALP model gives students more time and opportunities to learn. Though the survey and interviews about the student's awareness of the class with applied the ALP model, this study showed that students actively exchanged their opinions in the class with applied ALP model.

본 연구의 목적은 거꾸로 수업의 이점과 한계를 분석하여 실제수업 적용에 효율적인 ALP 모형을 개발하고, 그 효과를 확인하는 데 있다. 새로운 모형과 프로그램 개발 과정은 ADDIE 모형을 기초로 하였다. 먼저 거꾸로 수업의 어려움 분석과 관련된 연구들을 분석하여 새 모형의 주요 구성 요소를 추출하였고, 이 요소들을 수업의 흐름에 따라 재배치함으로써 ALP 모형을 개발하였다. 모형은 요약 강의 참여 단계(Attending a Short Lecture), 갭(gap) 이용 추가 학습 단계(Learning More in a Gap), 학생 중심 학습 수행 단계(Performing Student-centered Learning)의 3단계로 구성된다. 과학적 의사소통능력에 대한 모형의 효과를 살펴보기 위해 ALP 모형을 적용한 초등과학 프로그램을 개발하였다. 추가적인 정보를 얻기 위해서 수업에 대한 인식 조사와 실험집단 학생들 중 일부를 대상으로 면담을 진행하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 거꾸로 수업의 어려움을 분석한 논문을 살펴본 결과 수업의 흐름에 따라 다양한 종류의 어려움을 확인할 수 있었으나, 주로 사전학습과 관련된 것이었다. 이를 바탕으로 수업 구조적인 변화를 주어 사전학습의 동영상 강의 부분을 다시 교실로 가지고 오고, 자율적인 추가 학습 부분을 교실 밖에 유지하였다. 이를 통해 거꾸로 수업에서 의사소통능력 향상에 도움을 주는 학생중심학습 시간의 증대를 꾀하고, 거꾸로 수업의 사전학습에서 교사의 준비 부담과 학생의 참여 관련 어려움을 줄이고자 하였다. ALP 모형을 적용한 초등 과학 프로그램을 적용한 뒤에 과학적 의사소통능력측면의 효과를 살펴본 결과, 실험집단에서 유의한 향상이 있음을 확인하였다. 세부 결과에서는 표와 그림 형태와 주장형과 정당화 유형에서 유의한 효과를 확인하였다. 이는 학생들에게 학생중심학습의 시간과 기회를 보다 많이 제공한 결과로 볼 수 있으며, 이는 수업에 대한 인식조사나 면담에서도 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. H., & Shin, Y. J. (2015). The Effect of Structure-centered Cooperative Learning on Scientific Communication Skills in Elementary School Biology (Organisms and the Environment Unit). Biology Education, 43(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.4.381
  2. Bak, A. R. N., & Kim, Y. K. (2014). Research Articles : The Effects of STEAM Program on the Scientific Communication Skills and the Learning Flow of Elementary Gifted Students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 439-452. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.3.439
  3. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: ISTE; and Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  4. Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013, June). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASSE, Washington DC.
  5. Gunter, M. A., Estes, T. H., & Mintz, S. L. (2005). Instruction: A Models Approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  6. Ha, J. H., & Shin, Y. J. (2014). An Analysis on the Relation of Elementary Students’ VARK Styles and Scientific Communication Skills. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 724-735. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.4.724
  7. Ha, J. H., & Shin, Y. J. (2016). Analysis of Awareness of Teachers for Core Competencies and Scientific Core Competencies. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(4), 426-441. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.4.426
  8. Jeon, S. S. (2013). Development of scientific communication skills test for elementary school students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
  9. Jeon, S. S. (2014). A comparison analysis of scientific communication skills between gifted students and general students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(1), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.1.149
  10. Jeong, M. (2014). The effect of flipped classroom on elementary learner's mathematics academic achievement and attitude. Unpublished mater's thesis, Korea National University of Education.
  11. Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2014). The effect of scientific discussion classes focusing problem finding on the primary school students’ scientific creative problem solving ability and science process skills. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 7(1), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2014.7.1.133
  12. Korean Educational Psychology Association (2000). Dictionary for Educational Psychology. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  13. Lage, M., Platt, G., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
  14. Lee, S. G., & Lee, H. L. (2013). The effects and development of project-based STEAM program. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 6(1), 78-86.
  15. Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised national science curriculum. No 2015-74(9).
  16. Ministry of Education. (2016). Elementary School 6-1 Science Teacher's Guidebook. Seoul: Mirae-N.
  17. OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: Science, Reading, Mathematics and Financial literacy. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-assessment-and-analytical-framework_ 9789264255425-en
  18. Park, T. J., & Cha H. J. (2015). Investigation of Teachers’ Awareness of Flipped Classroom to Explore its Educational Feasibility. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(1), 81-97.
  19. Shin, M. K. (2004). Change in teacher' beliefs of science teaching and learning through inservice program experiences focusing on student-centeredness. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25, 53-62.
  20. Shin, Y. J., & Ha, J. H. (2016). Analysis of Science Teachers’ Perception of Flipped Learning. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 20(1), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2016.20.2.152
  21. Shin, Y. J., Ha, J. H. & Lee, S. H. (2016a). An Analysis of the Perceptions and Difficulties Experienced by Science Teachers in Flipped Learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0159
  22. Shin, Y. J., Moon, H. S., Park, J. S., Lee S. H., Lee, S. Y., Jhun, Y. S., Ji, J. H., & Hong, J. E. (2016b). A Study on the Development of Science Textbooks for the Implementation of Flipped Learning. (KOFAC Research report SBJ000018453). Seoul: KOFAC.
  23. Shin, Y. J., Ha, J. H., Hong, J. E., Jhun, Y. S., Lee, S. Y. Park, J. S., Ji, J. H., Lee, S. A., Moon, H. S., & Lee S. H. (2016c). A Study on the Development of Science Textbooks for the Implementation of Flipped Learning. Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2016.40.1.90
  24. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4