Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Path Analysis of Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence, Linguistic Intelligence, Flow and Learning Outcomes in Motion-Capture Game-Based Learning

동작인식게임 활용학습에서의 신체운동지능, 언어지능, 몰입, 학습성과 간 경로분석

  • 류은진 (한성대학교 교육혁신원) ;
  • 강명희 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.04
  • Accepted : 2017.12.15
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, there is a growing interest in learning to use games as a teaching method for digital native learners. In this study, we conducted a path analysis between bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, linguistic intelligence, flow, learning outcomes(academic achievement, persistence intention) in motion-capture game-based learning(the used game developed for elementary school history class). As a result, bodily-kinesthetic intelligence directly influenced flow and indirectly influenced learning outcomes. Linguistic intelligence did not have direct influence on flow and indirect effects on learning outcomes. Through this result, we expected that the motion-capture game-based learning facilitate learning motivation and performance of learners for higher bodily-kinesthetic intelligence.

최근 디지털 네이티브 학습자를 위한 교수방법으로 게임활용학습에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 초등학교 역사수업에 맞추어 개발된 동작인식 게임을 활용하여 수업을 실시한 후 신체운동지능, 언어지능, 몰입, 학습성과(학업성취도, 지속의향) 간 경로분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 신체운동지능은 몰입에 직접적인 영향을 학습성과에는 간접적인 영향을 미쳤고, 언어지능은 몰입에 직접적인 영향, 그리고 학습성과에의 간접적인 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 분석되었다. 이 결과를 통해, 동작인식 게임활용학습은 신체운동 역량이 높은 학습자들의 학습동기 및 성과 향상을 지원할 수 있음을 기대하게 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, Y., Kim, H. (2005). An analysis of the key factors in Flow and Game Play Intention of Educational Online Games. Educational technology international, 21(3), 1-32.
  2. Chung, H.Y., Cho, Y., Jeong, K. S., Park, J. Y. (2004). In Which Contexts Children Are Mostly Engaged in Elementary School Classroom?. The Journal of Elementary Education, 17(2), 181-206.
  3. Hsu, H. M. J. (2011). The potential of kinect in education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(5), 365-370.
  4. Kang, M. H. Lee, S. Y, Chung, Y.H. (2015, February). Investigating the effects on social presence and topic interest of elementary school students. 3rd Dubai internaional conference in higher education.
  5. Kelly, D., & Tangney, B. (2006). Adapting to intelligence profile in an adaptive educational system. Interacting With Computers, 18(3), 385-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2005.11.009
  6. Kim, S., Hong, S. (2015). Relation among After-school Physical exercise class Satisfaction, Self-expression, and Continuing exercise intention. Korean Journal of Sports Science, 18(2), 349-360.
  7. Park, H., Park S. (2010). An Analysis of Perceptions of Teacher for Game-Based Learning. Journal of Korea Game Society, 10(4). 91-102.
  8. Bong, G. J.(2014). A Structural Relationship among Affective Aspects of Literacy, Class Engagement, and Literacy Achievement. The Society Of Korean Language Education, 144, 431-464.
  9. Chao, K. J., Huang, H. W., Fang, W. C., &Chen, N. S. (2013). Embodied play to learn: Exploring kinect? facilitated memory performance.?British Journal of Educational Technology,?44(5), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12018
  10. Cheon, K. (2010). The Influence of Basic Psychology Needs on Exercise Commitment and Bodily Kinesthetic Intelligence of Middle School Students. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction(14). 469-487.
  11. Choi, J. M. (2001). The relationship among multiple intelligences, creativity and academic achievement of the elementary school students. Master's Thesis, Cheongju: Korea National University.
  12. Chung, J. Y., Shin, I., Lee, H. (2009). A Study on the Test-Based Educational Accountability System. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(1), pp. 241-260.
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and row project. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 5(3), 225-237.
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2001). Conditions for optimal development in adolescence: An experiential approach. Applied Developmental Science, 5(3), 122-124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0503_1
  15. Dickey, M. D. (2005). Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504866
  16. Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2005). Estimating one's own and one's relatives' multiple intelligence: A study from Argentina. The Spanish journal of psychology, 8(01), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600004911
  17. Gardner, H. (2001). Intelligence reframed : multiple intelligences for the 21st century (Moon, Y.R. Trans.). Seoul: Gimmyoung. (Original 1999 Eds.).
  18. Kang, M., Kim, M., Kim, M. J., Park, H., Koo, J. (2009). Investigating the Relationships among Prior knowledge, Cognitive Load, Flow, and Achievement. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 13(2), 369-391. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2009.13.2.369
  19. KERIS (2006). An evaluation study of effectiveness of the Cyber Home Learning System for primary and secondary school students (CR 2006-8). Seoul: Korea Eductaion and Research Information Service.
  20. Kim, N.(2015). Games Development Methodology as a Teaching Tool for Elementary School: Case Study of Developing History Learning Game. Journal of Korea Game Society, 15(2), p53-62. https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2015.15.2.53
  21. Kim, Y. H., Kim, Y. (2006). Study on the Relationships among Learner's Individual Differentiation Factors, Flow, Language Learning Strategies, Achievement, and Satisfaction in Online English Writing Learning. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 12(4), 289-314.
  22. Kline, B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford Press.
  23. Kwon, S., Jung, K. (2014). The Relationship among Enjoyment, Flow and Satisfaction of P.E Class in Elementary Schoolchild. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 25(3), 149-165.
  24. Lee, H. (2013). The Analysis of Students' Interest in History Class. History Education, 127, 65-99.
  25. Lee, J. (2008). Multiple Intelligence Instruction and Children's Engagement. Master Thesis. Seoul: Sookmyung TESOL Graduate School.
  26. Lee, Y. (2009). The search of the Mediators of Academic Motivation in Relationship between Multiple intelligences and Academic achievement. Doctoral thesis. Seoul: Sookmyung University Graduate School.
  27. McMahon, S. D. (2004). Multiple intelligences and reading achievement: An examination of the teele inventory of multiple intelligences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 2004, 73(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.71.1.41-52
  28. Mhurchu, C. N., Maddison, R., Jiang, Y., Jull, A., Prapavessis, H., & Rodgers, A. (2008). Couch potatoes to jumping beans: A pilot study of the effect of active video games on physical activity in children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(1), 8. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-8.
  29. Ministry of Education and Science Technology(2011b). Language 5-1. Elementary Teacher Guide. Seoul: MEST.
  30. Moon, Y., Rye, S., Kim, H., Kim, S. (2001). Measuring Multiple Intelligence in Korea. Seoul: Seoul National University College of Education.
  31. Nam, K., Lim, S., Nam, I., Kim, M. (2009).The Effect of Physical Competence on Physical Education Satisfaction of Elementary Students. The Korean Society Of Sports Science. 2009(5), 349-360.
  32. Naver encyclopedia (n.d.). Naver encyclopedia. http://terms.naver.com/ retrieved by May/30/2017
  33. Noh, G. Y. (2012). Experience, Self-efficacy, Game Performance, Structural Equation Modelling. THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF COMPUTER EDUCATION, 12(2), 15-29.
  34. Park, J., Noh, G. (2015). The Effects of Interactivity on User Experience and Intention to use in Mobile Fitness App Game. Journal of Korea Game Society, 15(6), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2015.15.6.17
  35. Park. H. (2009). Exploring relationships among game features, learner competence, flow, motivation, and learning achievement in game-based learning. CheongJu: Korea National University of Education Gradaute School.
  36. Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. NY: Paragon House.
  37. Seok, I. (2008). Analyzing Characters of the Learning Flow. Educational technology international, 24(1), 187-212.
  38. Sommool, W., Battulga, B., Shih, T. K., & Hwang, W. Y. (2013, October). Using Kinect for holodeck classroom: A framework for presentation and assessment. In International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 40-49). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  39. Uysal, E. (2004). The Relationships between seventh and tenth grade students' self-estimated intelligence dimensions, and their science of physics achievement. Doctoral dissertation. MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.