Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Project Management for Product Development using Quality Tools

품질도구를 활용한 제품개발 프로젝트관리

  • 박영현 (강남대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2017.11.04
  • Accepted : 2017.11.20
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper proposes an effective and systematic methods of risk management in product development project. Methods: This paper first discusses what risk factors be considered during product development period and then presented a model for preventive risk management. For that, this paper proposes how to evaluate the risk factors and risk events, and how to select prevention action for managing risk factors effectively. For this process, this paper uses well-known quality tools such as House of Quality (HOQ) and Failure Mode and Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) methods. Results: There is an inherent need for the development of robust risk management framework in order for product development projects to be successful. The identification and quantification of risk factors, risk events, and prevention actions can have significant effects on the success of a product development projects. Project managers can implement the proposed model to improve project success. Conclusion: The findings showed that this method would be effective for project managements in dealing with risk management issues in product development projects. This method presented would be an one of good guidelines for practitioners in the industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Akpolat, H. 2010. "A frame work for systematic for management of risk." The Asian J. on Quality 10(2):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/15982680980001441
  2. Badir, Y.F., Buchel, B., & Tucci, C. 2009. "The performance impact of intra-firm organizational design on an alliance's new product development projects." Research Policy 38:1350-1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.010
  3. Barber, R. B. 2005. "Understanding internally generated risks in projects." International Journal of Project Management 23:584-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.006
  4. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin. B. 2004. "Cooperative R&D and firm performance." Research Policy 33:1477-1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
  5. Chang, K. Y. 2010. "R&D investment and project performance: research on industrial R&D programs of government." 18(10):75-98.
  6. Cooper, R.G., & Kleinschmidt, E.J. 1995. "New product performance: keys to success, profitability & cycle time reduction." Journal of Marketing Management 11(4):315-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1995.9964347
  7. Cooper, R.G., & Kleinschmidt, E.J. 2000. "New product performance: what distinguishes the stat products." Australian Journal of Management 25(2):17-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620002500104
  8. Davila. A. 2003. "Short-term economic incentives in new product development." Research Policy 32:1397-1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00138-5
  9. Han, S.R., & Cho, K. T. 2013. "Relationships between risk factors and R&D output : approach to new product development process." Journal of Technology Innovation 21(1):165-198.
  10. Kim, H., & Kim B. K. 2015. "A study on the critical success factors for new product development in Korean SMEs," Korean Journal of Business Administration 28(11):2851-2881. https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2015.28.11.2851
  11. Luppino, R., Hosseini, M., & Rameezdeen, R. 2014. "Risk management in research and development projects : the case of south australia." Asian Academy of Management Journal 19(2):67-85.
  12. Mastroianni, S. 2011. "Risk management among research and development projects." Lehigh University.
  13. Miller, R. & Lessard, D. 2009. "Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects." International Journal of Project Management 19: 437-443.
  14. Millstone, E. 2009. "Science, risk & governance; radical rhetoric and the realities of reform in food safety governance." Research Policy 38: 624-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.012
  15. Oehman, Dick, Lindemann & Seering. 2006. "Risk management in product development-current methods." International Design Conference, 1551-1558.
  16. Park, Y. H. 2013. "A structured approach for risk management." The Asian Journal on Quality 14(1):55-65.
  17. Park, Y. H. 2016. "Project management using a risk mode and action plan method." Korean Journal of Business Administration 29(10):1549-1564. https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2016.29.10.1549
  18. Park, S., and Kim, J. 2011. "A risk management system framework for new product development." 2011 International Conference on Economics and Finance Research 4:51-65.
  19. Pujawan, I. N., and Geraldin, L. H. 2009. "House of risk : a model for proactive supply chain risk management." Business Process Management Journal 15(6):953-967. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003801
  20. Raz, T. 2005. "A comparative review or risk management standards." Risk Management International Journal 7(4):53-66.
  21. Rocha, H.. & Delamaro, M. 2012. "Project/product development process critical success factors: a literature compilation." Research in Logistics & Production 2: 273-291.
  22. Susterova, M, Lavin, J, & Rives, J. 2012. "Risk management in product development process." Annual of DAAAM 23(1):225-228.
  23. Thamhain H. J., & Skelton, T.M.. 2007. "Success factors for effective R&D risk management." International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning 3(4):376-385. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2007.016307