지각된 시스템과, 정보, 서비스 품질이 사용자별 스마트폰 애플리케이션 이용성과에 미치는 영향

The Effects of the Perceived Qualities of Systems, Information, and Service on Individual Performance in a Smartphone Application Context

  • Jung, Wonjin (The School of Business Administration, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Taehwan (The School of Business Administration, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2016.02.03
  • 심사 : 2016.03.19
  • 발행 : 2016.03.31

초록

최근 스마트폰을 포함한 각종 모바일 기기들은 여러 분야에서 전통적 개인용 컴퓨터를 차츰 대체해 나가고 있으며, 컴퓨터와 인터넷에 이은 새로운 컴퓨팅 패러다임을 구축해 나가고 있다. 그러나 PC와 다른 사용 환경과 모바일 기기의 하드웨어적 특성으로 인해 스마트폰 애플리케이션의 시스템, 정보, 서비스의 품질은 애플리케이션의 이용성(Usability)과 애플리케이션 이용을 통하여 얻을 수 있는 사용자의 개인적 성과(Performance)에 많은 영향을 미칠 것으로 예상된다. 이에 본 연구는 스마트폰의 물리적, 환경적 사용 여건에서 스마트폰 애플리케이션의 시스템, 정보, 서비스 품질이 애플리케이션의 이용성을 매개로 애플리케이션을 통한 사용자마다의 개인별 이용성과에 미치는 영향을 실증적으로 살펴 보았다. 최근의 애플리케이션 이용자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였고 구조방정식을 통하여 자료를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 본 연구는 스마트폰 애플리케이션의 시스템, 정보, 서비스 품질이 애플리케이션의 지각된 이용성을 매개로 사용자의 애플리케이션 이용성과에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.

Today's mobile devices including smartphones are gradually taking a prominent position in many areas as portable multimedia computers and establishing a new computing paradigm. Nevertheless, it would not be easy for smartphone applications to provide users with a high level of usability under the current environment due to the physical hardware characteristics of each smartphone, which are expected to have a negative impact on the qualities of system, information, and service that smartphone applications provide. Thus, this study examined: 1) the effects of the perceived qualities of system, information, and service of smartphone applications on the perceived usability of the applications, and 2) the effect of the usability on users' individual performance with the given application. A survey was conducted and structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data. This study found that there are significant effects of the perceived qualities of system, information, and service of smartphone applications on the perceived usability of the applications. In addition, this study also found a significant effect of the usability of samrtphone applications on the individual performance with the application.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 이지원, 강인원, "웹사이트 품질과 웹활동에 따른 질적성과연구", 통상정보연구, 제17권, 제2호, 2015, pp. 41-65.
  2. 정헌배, 노승훈, "이동통신 서비스 시장에서 로열티 프로그램의 지각된 가치와 서비스 충성도 간의 영향 관계", 통상정보연구, 제17권, 제3호, 2015, pp. 323-358.
  3. Ahituv, N., "A Systematic Approach Toward Assessing the Value of an Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1980, pp. 61-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/248961
  4. Alkhattabi, M., Neagu, D., and Cullen, A., "Assessing Information Quality of e-Learning Systems: A Web Mining Approach," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27, 2011, pp. 862-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.011
  5. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W., "Structural Euation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, 1988, pp. 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  6. Asubonteng, P. McCleary, K.J., and Swan, J.E., "SERVQUAL Revisited: A Critical Review of Service Quality," The Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1996, pp. 62-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049610148602
  7. Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W., "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 5, 1983, pp. 530-545. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  8. Blandford, A. and Buchanan, G., "Usability for Digital Libraries," Proceedings of the Second ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, New York: ACM Press, 2002.
  9. Booth, P., An Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 1989.
  10. Brinck, T., Gergle, D., and Wood, S.D., Designing Web Sites That Work: Usability for the Web, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2002.
  11. Chae, M., Kim, J., Kim, H., and Ryu, H., "Information Quality for Mobile Internet Services: A Theoretical Model with Empirical Validation," Electronic Markets, Vol. 12, 2002, pp. 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802753433254
  12. Chevalier, A. and Kicka, M., "Web Designers and Web Users: Influence of the Ergonomic Quality of the Web Site on the Information Search," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, 2006, pp. 1031-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.002
  13. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D., "A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 1990, pp. 128-152, https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  14. Costabile, M., "Usability in the Software Life Cycle," Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 1, 2001.
  15. Davis, F., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  16. DeLone W.H. and McLean, E.R., "Information Systems Success: The Quest for The Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1992, pp. 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  17. DeLone W.H. and McLean, E.R., "The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2003, pp. 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  18. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., and Beale, R., Human-Computer Interaction, Prentice-Hall, 1993.
  19. Dixon, J., Nanni, A., and Vollman, T., The new performance challenge: Measuring Operations for World Class Competition, Business One Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1990.
  20. Doll W.J. and Torkzadeh, G., "The Measure of End-user Computing Satisfaction," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1989, pp. 259-274. https://doi.org/10.2307/248851
  21. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 1981, pp. 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  22. Fu, L.P., Usability Evalution of Web Page Design, Ph.D. Dissertation, Perdue University, 1999.
  23. Gallagher, C.A., "Perceptions of the Value of a Management Information Systems," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1974, pp. 46-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/254770
  24. Gummerus, J., Liljander, V., Pura, M., and Van Riel, A., "Customer Loyalty to Content-Based Websites: The Case of an Online Health Care Service," Journal of Service Marketing, Vol. 18, No, 3, 2004, pp. 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040410536486
  25. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall International, 1998.
  26. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., and Tatham, R.L., Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed., Prentice-Hall International, 2006.
  27. Harper, J., Measuring Business Performance, Institute of Manpower Studies, Gower, Aldershot, 1984.
  28. Hix, D. and Hartson, H.R., Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability through Product and Process, John Wiley, New York, 1993.
  29. Ho, C.T.B. and Lin, W.C., "Measuring the Service Quality of Internet Banking: Scale Development and Validation," European Business Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2010, pp. 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341011008981
  30. Hoyle, R.H. and Panter, A.T., "Writing about Structural Equation Models," in R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.:Sage, 1995.
  31. Iivari, J. and Koskela, E., "The PIOCO Model for Information Systems Design," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1987, pp. 401-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/248688
  32. ISO 9241, ISO 9241-11 DIS Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals, part 11, Guidance on Usability, Draft International Standard, 1994.
  33. ISO 9241, ISO 9241-10 DIS Ergonimic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals, part 10, Dialogue Principles, 1996.
  34. Ives, B., Olson, M.H., and Baroudi. J.J., "The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction," Communications of ACM Vol. 26, No. 10, 1993, pp. 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1145/358413.358430
  35. Jacks, T., Palvia, P., Schilhavy, R., and Wang, L., "A Framework for the Impact of IT on Organizational Performance," Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2011, pp. 846-870. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151111166213
  36. Jeng, J., "What is Usability in the Context of the Digital Library and How Can It Be Measured?" Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2005, pp. 47-56. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v24i2.3365
  37. Kaplan R. and Norton, D., The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1996.
  38. Kaplan, R and Norton, D., The Strategy Maps, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2004.
  39. Kassim, N. and Abdullah, N.A., "The Effect of Perceived Service Quality Dimensions on Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Loyalty in e-Commerce Settings," Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2010, pp. 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851011062269
  40. Keach, S., Microsoft Says Windows Phone Now Touts 300,000 Apps, http://www.t3.com/news/microsoft-says-windows-phone-now-touts-300000-apps, 2014.
  41. King, W.R. and Epstein, B.J., "Assessing Information Systems Value," Decision Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1993, pp. 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1983.tb00167.x
  42. Kurosu, M. and Kashimura, K., "Apparent Usability vs. Interent Usability: Experimental Anamysis of the Determinants of the Apparent Usability," Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York, 1995, pp. 292-293.
  43. Kurstedt, H., Management System Theory and Practices, Course Lectures for ISE 4015 and 4016, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 1992.
  44. Larcker, D.F. and Lessig, V.P., "Perceived Usefulness of Information: A Psychometric Examination," Decision Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1980, pp. 121-134.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1980.tb01130.x
  45. Landauer, T.K., The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability and Productivity, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1995.
  46. Liebowitz, J., "Will Knowledge Management Work in the Government?", Electronic Government: An International Journal, Vol. 1. No. 1, 2004, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2004.004133
  47. Liebowitz, J., Ayyavoo, N., Nguyen, H., Carran, D., and Simien, J., "Cross-Generational Knowledge Flows in Edge Organizations," Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 107, No. 8, 2007, pp. 1123-1153. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710822787
  48. Mayhew, D.J., "Strategic Development of the Usability Engineering Function," Interactions, Vol. 6, No. 5, 1999, pp. 27-32.
  49. Neely, A., Measuring Business Performance, Economist Books, London, 1998.
  50. Neely, A., Business Performance Management Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
  51. Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.
  52. Nielsen, J and Robert, L.M., Usability Inspection Methods, Wiley, New York, 1994.
  53. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L., "A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, No. 4, 1985, pp. 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403
  54. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., and Berry, L.L., "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perception of Services Quality," Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64, No. 1, 1988, pp. 12-40.
  55. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., and Malhotra, A., "ESQUAL: A Multi-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality," Journal of Service Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2005, pp.213-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
  56. Perez, S., Mobile App Usage Increases In 2014, As Mobile Web Surfing Declines, http://techcrunch.com/2014/04/01/mobile-app-usage-increases-in-2014-as-mobile-web-surfing-declines/, 2014a
  57. Perez, S., iTunes App Store Now Has 1.2 Million Apps, Has Seen 75 Billion Downloads to Date, http://techcrunch.com/2014/06/02/itunes-app-store-now-has-1-2-million-apps-has-seen-75-billion-downloads-to-date/, 2014b
  58. Phusavat, K., Anussornnitisarn, P., Helo, P., and Dwight, R., "Performance Measurement: Roles and Challenges," Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 109, No. 5, 2009, pp. 646-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570910957632
  59. Putu, N., Mimba, S., van Helden, G., and Tillema, S., "Public Sector Performance Measurement in Developing Countries: A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, Vol. 3, 2007, pp. 192-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325910710820265
  60. Reisinger, D., Worldwide Smartphone User Base Hits 1 Billion, http://www.cnet.com/news/worldwide-smartphone-user-base-hits-1-billion/. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
  61. Ribbink, D., Van Riel Allard, C.R., Liljander, V., and Streukens, S., "Comfort Your Online Customer: Quality, Trust, and Loyalty on the Internet," Managing Service Quality, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2004, pp. 446-456. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520410569784
  62. Rowley, J., "An analysis of the e-service literature: Towards a research agenda," Internet Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2006, pp. 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240610673736
  63. Santos, J., "E-service Quality: A Model of Virtual Service Quality Dimensions," Managing Service Quality, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2003, pp. 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520310476490
  64. Seddon, P., "A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success," Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1997, pp. 240-253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  65. Shacker, B., "Ergonomics in Design for Usability," in People & Computers: Desinging for Usability. Proceeding of the Second Conference of the BCS HCI Specialists Group, ed. M.D. Harrison and A.F. Monk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1986.
  66. Sink, D., Productivity Management Planning Measurement and Evaluation Control and Improvement, Wiley, New York, NY, 1985.
  67. Sink D. and Tuttle, T., Planning and Measurement in Your Organization of the Future, IE Press, Norcross, GA, 1989.
  68. Smith, P.A., "Towards Practical Measure of Hypertext Usability," Interacting with Computers, Vol. 4, 1996, pp. 365-381.
  69. Spool, J.M., Scanlon, T., Schroeder, W., Snyder, C., and DeAngelo, T., Web Site Usability: A Designer's Guide, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1999.
  70. Szajna, B., "Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model," Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1996, pp. 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85
  71. Tractinsky, S., "The HEP Test for Grading Web Site Usability," Computers in Libraries, Vol. 22, No. 10, 1997, pp. 115-122.
  72. Turner, S., "The HEP Test for Grading Web Site Usability," Computers in Libraries, Vol. 22, No. 10, 2002, pp. 37-39.
  73. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., and Davis, F., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  74. Wang R.Y. and Strong, D.M., "Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1996, pp. 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099
  75. Wixom, B.H. and Todd, P.A., "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2005, pp. 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0042
  76. Yang, H.C., Bon Appetit for Apps: Young American Consumers' Acceptance of Mobile Applications, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 53, 2013, pp. 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645635
  77. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., and Malhotra, A., "Service Quality Delivery through Websites: A Critical Review of Extant Knowledge," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2002, pp. 362-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236911
  78. Zmud, R.W., "An Empirical Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Concept of Information," Decision Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1978, pp. 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1978.tb01378.x