DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surface Modification of Silica Spheres for Copper Removal

  • Received : 2016.01.05
  • Accepted : 2016.08.04
  • Published : 2016.10.20

Abstract

Efficient copper removal from water was achieved by using surface modified silica spheres with 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS) using base catalyst. The surface modification of silica spheres was performed by hydrolysis and condensation reactions of the MPTMS. The characteristic infrared absorption peaks at 2929, 1454, and 1343 cm−1 represent the −CH2 stretching vibration, asymmetric deformation, and deformation, respectively. The absorption peaks at 2580 and 693 cm−1 corresponding the −SH stretching vibration and the C-S stretching vibration indicate the incorporation of MPTMS to the surface of silica spheres. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) image of the surface modified silica sphere (SMSS) shows nano-particles of MPTMS on the surface of silica spheres. High concentration of copper solution (1000 ppm) was used to test the copper removal efficiency and uptake capacity. The FESEM image of SMSS treated with the copper solution shows large number of copper lumps on the surface of SMSS. The copper concentration drastically decreased with increasing the amount of SMSS. The residual copper concentrations were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. The copper removal efficiency and uptake capacity with 1000 ppm of copper solution were 99.99 % and 125 mg/g, respectively.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Heavy metals are stable and persistent environmental contaminants in water and soil. Although some heavy metals including Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn are required for metabolic activity in organisms, but more than required amounts of the elements become toxic. The other heavy metals along with Cd, Hg, Cr, and Pb exhibit extremely toxic even low level of concentration under certain conditions.1 Therefore, regular monitoring of these toxic elements in aquatic environment is required. Wastewaters containing copper are generated by mining activities and industries engaging in petroleum refining, metal plating, battery manufacturing, printing, paint production, pigment production, and pesticide production.2 Copper does not degrade in the environment and accumulates in plant and animal tissues resulting in serious health problems to humans. It is also identified as a causing element for Alzheimer’s disease. Many research efforts were focused on removal of copper ions from the soil and the water system. Large numbers of technologies including chemical precipitation,3 ion exchange,4 membrane filtration,5 flotation,6 electrochemical treatment,7 coagulation,8 flocculation,9 and adsorption10 have been practiced to ensure the environmental safety against Cu2+ in the industrial effluents. Each technology has its own advantages and drawbacks. For efficient Cu2+ removal from the wastewater, bioadsorption is a recently devised technology and is under testing phase with various bioadrotbents for the removal of heavy metals. A number of natural and synthetic adsorbents like moss,11 natural mineral sorbents,12 aspergillus niger,13 coconut bagasse,14 oil shale,15 and a barley by-product from the whisky distilling process.16 Most of the case, the removal efficiency is approximately in between 67−95% and drastically reduced with the increase of the copper concentration.1,2,17 In this paper, we report the process of the surface modification of silica spheres using 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS) with base catalysts and high removal efficiency of Cu2+ with high concentration of Cu2+. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images of bare silica spheres, surface modified spheres, and surface modified spheres treated with Cu2+ solution were also included in this report.

 

EXPERIMENTAL

A mixture of 2-propanol (100 ml) and ammonium hydroxide (100 ml) was used as a solvent and catalyst, respectively, and charged to a 250 ml round bottom flask. Tetraethoxy orthosilicate (TEOS, 4.0 g) was added to the mixture solution with vigorous stirring for 6 h, and then MPTMS (1 g) was added to the solution. The solution was sampled after 0.5, 1.5, 4.5 and 26 h for FTIR measurement. After 26 h stirring at room temperature, the resulting spheres were centrifuged to separate the spheres from the solution and washed with methanol three times. The spheres were dried in a drying oven for one day. Relatively high concentration of copper solution (1000 ppm) was prepared. The 5 vials contained with 10 ml of copper solution were prepared, and 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg of surface modified spheres were added to the vials. The vials were sonicated for 10 min to disperse the spheres, were stirred for 5 min, and then were centrifuged to separate the solution and the spheres. FTIR spectra of surface modified silica spheres were obtained using Nicolet iS5 FTIR spectrometer. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images of bare silica spheres, surface modified spheres, and surface modified spheres after treatment of copper solution were obtained with JEOL ISM-7401F field emission scanning electron microscope. The residual copper concentrations were analyzed with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Varian 820MS).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Peptide-polysaccharide-resembling structure with 2.2% of mercapto group was utilized for heavy-metal removal.18 Mercaptoacetyl chitosan was applied to remove Cu2+ and turbidity from the wastewater.19 Nano-sized spherical shape has largest surface area compared with the other shapes. It is interesting to attach functional groups to the surface of the nano-sized spheres to remove heavy-metals from wastewater, to filter organic materials and to use catalyst. Fig. 1 shows the graphical representation of surface modification and copper removal process using surface modified silica spheres. The MPTMS molecules were attached to the surface of silica spheres using NH4OH catalyst. The mercapto-group of the MPTMS works as an active functional group for copper removal.

Figure 1.The graphical representation of surface modification of silica spheres and copper uptake process.

An MPTMS has three methoxy groups, which are facilely hydrolyzed with acid or base and one mercaptopropyl group, which acts as a main functional group. Approximately 30 ml of reaction solution was taken from the batch solution after 0.5, 1.5, 4.58, and 26 h reaction and centrifuged to separate the modified silica spheres. The spheres were washed three times with methanol and dropped to a KBr plate to take FTIR spectrum. The chemical structure and FTIR spectrum of MPTMS are shown in Fig. 2(a) and 2 (b), respectively. FTIR spectrum of pure silica spheres is shown in Fig. 2(c). The MPTMS is directly added to the Stöber synthetic solution and sampled after 0.5, 1.5, 4.5, and 26 h. The FTIR spectra of the surface modified silica spheres are shown in Fig. 2(d). For the 26 h sample spectrum, characteristic new peaks at 2929, 1454, and 1343 cm−1 representing the −CH2 stretching vibration, asymmetric deformation, and deformation, respectively are appeared. Very small peak at 2580 cm−1 caused by −SH stretching vibration is also appeared. The peak at 693 cm−1 represents the C-S stretching vibration. Small peaks at 1454 and 693 cm−1 are appeared for 4.5 h sample, which indicate that the some amount of MPTMS molecules are attached to silica spheres after 4.5 h reaction at room temperature.

Figure 2.(a) Chemical structure of MPTMS, (b) FTIR spectrum of MPTMS, (c) FTIR spectrum of pure silica spheres, and (d) FTIR spectra of surface modified silica spheres reacted for 0.5, 1.5, 4.5, and 26 h with MPTMS.

Surface modification with certain materials can be directly proved with scanning electron microscope image. Figs. 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c) show the FESEM images of pure silica spheres, surface modified silica spheres with MPTMS, and surface modified silica spheres treated with copper solution, respectively. Bare silica spheres have very smooth surface as shown in Fig. 3(a). However, surface modified spheres show rough surface pattern as shown in Fig. 3(b). Fig. 3(c) shows large number of Cu particles on the surface of the spheres, which implies that the copper ions are not only attached individually but also aggregated on the mercaptan groups.

Figure 3.FESEM images of (a) bare silica spheres, (b) surface modified silica spheres with MPTMS, and (c) surface modified silica spheres after treatment with copper solution.

The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) result data for the pure silica spheres, surface modified spheres with MPTMS, and surface modified spheres treated with Cu2+ solution were in Table 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The surface modified spheres with MPTMS show approximately 10.78 wt % as shown in Table 2. The amount of copper was approximately 5.71 wt %.

Table 1.EDS result for pure silica spheres

Table 2.EDS result for surface modified silica spheres with MPTMS

Table 3.EDS result for surface modified silica spheres treated with Cu2+

Initially, high copper concentration (1000 ppm) was utilized due to the high ratio of copper uptake was expected. Fig. 4 shows copper concentration after treating 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg of surface modified silica sphere. The copper concentration reduced from 1000 mg/L to 0.075 mg/L after treatment of 80 mg of surface modified silica spheres, which indicated that the removal efficiency was 99.99% with high copper concentration. The copper uptake capacity is approximately 125 mg/g.

Figure 4.Residual copper concentration after treated with 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg of surface modified silica spheres.

 

CONCLUSION

The surface of silica spheres was modified using MPTMS with base catalyst to remove copper ions from the wastewater. The FTIR result shows large amount of MPTMS molecules are attached to the surface of silica spheres after 26 h reaction at room temperature. Although the surface of bare silica sphere was very smooth, the surface of modified silica spheres was rough. The copper ions are aggregated on the surface of the surface modified spheres. Copper uptake efficiency and capacity are 99.99% and 125 mg/g, respectively.

References

  1. Dundar, M.; Nuhoglu, C.; Nuhoglu, Y. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.055
  2. Bilal, M.; Shah, J. A.; Ashfaq, T.; Gardazi, S. M. H.; Tahir, A. A.; Pervez, A.; Haroon, H.; Mahmood, Q. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 263, 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.071
  3. Kokes, H.; Morcali, M. H.; Acma, E. Eng. Sci. Tech. 2014, 17, 39.
  4. Ntimbani, R. N.; Simate, G. S.; Ndlovu, S. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.02.010
  5. Su, Y. N.; Lin, W. S.; Hou, C. H.; Den, W. J. Water Process Eng. 2014, 4, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.09.012
  6. Roy, S.; Datta, A.; Rehani, S. Inter. J. Mineral Processing 2015, 143, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2015.08.008
  7. Ferraro, I.; Hullebusch, E. D.; Huguenot, D.; Fabbricino, M.; Esposito, G. J. Environ. Management 2015, 163, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.004
  8. Rabiet, M.; Letouzet, M.; Hassanzadeh, S.; Simon, S. Chemosphere 2014, 95, 639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.102
  9. Yang, Z.; Jia, S.; Zhuo, N.; Yang, W.; Wang, Y. Chemosphere 2015, 141, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.050
  10. Doh, J. H.; Kim, J. H.; Kim, H. J.; Ali, R. F.; Shin, K.; Hong, Y. J. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 277, 352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.120
  11. Lee, C. K.; Low, K. S. Environ. Technol. 1989, 10, 395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593338909384755
  12. Sljivic, M.; Smiciklas, I.; Plecas, I.; Pejanovic, S. Environ. Technol. 2011, 32, 933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2010.521952
  13. Price, M. S.; Classen, J. J.; Payne, G. A. Biores. Technol. 2001, 77, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00135-8
  14. Neto, V. O. S.; Oliveira, A. G.; Teixeira, R. N. P.; Silva, M. A. A.; Feire, P. T. C.; Keukeleire, D. D.; Nascimento, R. F. BioResources 2011, 6, 3376.
  15. Shawabkeh, R.; Al-Harahsheh, A.; Al-Otoom, A. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40, 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2004.03.006
  16. Lu, S.; Gibb, S. W. Biores. Technol. 2008, 99, 1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.024
  17. Basci, N.; Kocadagistan, E.; Kocadagistan, B. Desalination 2004, 164, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00172-9
  18. Sun, B.; Mi, Z. T.; An, G.; Zou, J. J. Industrial Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 9823. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie900673h
  19. Chang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Wang, J. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.144