대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제54권4호
  • /
  • Pages.364-369
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

총의치 사용에 대한 환자와 술자간 평가 비교

Comparison between denture wearer's evaluation and clinician's rating for complete denture

  • 변진수 (원광대학교 산본치과병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 허윤혁 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Byun, Jin-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonkwang University Sanbon Dental Hospital) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-La (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.03.16
  • 심사 : 2016.06.07
  • 발행 : 2016.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 총의치를 사용하고 있는 무치악 환자에서 의치 사용에 대한 환자의 평가와 술자간의 평가를 비교하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 의치를 사용한지 최소 1년 이상 경과된 총의치 장착자 중 43명의 환자가 정기검진에 응하였다. 환자에 관한 여러 정보를 얻기 위해 다양한 문헌에서 얻은 자료를 토대로 설문지를 개발하고 술자의 객관적인 평가간 일치도를 분석하였다. 술자의 평가 사항으로는 유지, 안정, 교합과 같은 기능적 항목과 의치의 상태를 포함한다. Friedman test와 Cohen's Kappa값을 이용하여 통계학적인 분석을 시행하였다. 결과: 의치 장착자의 평가와 술자의 평가 간에는 약하거나 약간의 차이가 있다. 상악 의치보다는 하악의치에서 차이가 더 크게 나타났으며 심미와 저작은 중등도의 차이가 있었다. 결론: 의치에 대한 환자의 주관적, 술자의 객관적인 평가는 일치하지 않으나 큰 차이를 보이지 않는다.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare denture wearer's evaluation and clinician's technical rating for complete denture used on edentulous patients. Materials and methods: Total 43 edentulous patients who had complete denture fabricated more than one year ago were recalled. The questionnaire based on the various literatures was modified and applied to patients for subjective assessments. Functional aspects related to retention, stability, occlusion and denture condition were included in operator's evaluation. In addition, correlations were evaluated between patient's subjective and operator's objective assessments. Friedman test and Cohen's Kappa value were used for statistical analysis. Results: It was found that denture wearers' evaluations were slightly or fairly agree to clinician's rating for complete denture. More differences were found in maxillary denture than mandibular denture and moderate difference was found in esthetic, occlusion aspects. Conclusion: There were slightly or fairly agreement between subjective and objective evaluations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yoshizumi DT. An evaluation of factors pertinent to the success of complete denture service. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14:866-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(64)90015-0
  2. van Waas MA. The influence of psychologic factors on patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:545-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90073-L
  3. Berg E. The influence of some anamnestic, demographic, and clinical variables on patient acceptance of new complete dentures. Acta Odontol Scand 1984;42:119-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.1984.11978554
  4. Berg E, Johnsen TB, Ingebretsen R. Social variables and patient acceptance of complete dentures. A study of patients attending a dental school. Acta Odontol Scand 1985;43:199-203. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358509046499
  5. Davis EL, Albino JE, Tedesco LA, Portenoy BS, Ortman LF. Expectations and satisfaction of denture patients in a university clinic. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:59-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90074-0
  6. Carlsson GE, Otterland A, Wennstrom A, Odont D. Patient factors in appreciation of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:322-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(67)90002-9
  7. Bergman B, Carlsson GE. Review of 54 complete denture wearers. Patients' opinions 1 year after treatment. Acta Odontol Scand 1972;30:399-414. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357209002493
  8. Langer A, Michman J, Seifert I. Factors influencing satisfaction with complete dentures in geriatric patients. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:1019-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(61)90038-5
  9. Heyink J, Heezen J, Schaub R. Dentist and patient appraisal of complete dentures in a Dutch elderly population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986;14:323-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1986.tb01083.x
  10. Pietrokovski J, Harfin J, Mostavoy R, Levy F. Oral findings in elderly nursing home residents in selected countries: quality of and satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:132-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80151-9
  11. Seifert I, Langer A, Michmann J. Evaluation of psychologic factors in geriatric denture patients. J Prosthet Dent 1962;3:516-23.
  12. Smith M. Measurement of personality traits and their relation to patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1976;35:492-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90043-3
  13. Bergman B, Carlsson GE. Clinical long-term study of complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90066-6
  14. de Baat C, van Aken AA, Mulder J, Kalk W. "Prosthetic condition" and patients' judgment of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:472-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70062-3
  15. Rayson JH, Rahn AO, Ellinger CW, Wesley RC, Frazier QZ, Lutes MR, Henderson D, Haley JV. The value of subjective evaluation in clinical research. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:111-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90040-0
  16. van Waas MA. Determinants of dissatisfaction with dentures: a multiple regression analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:569-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90130-5
  17. Woelfel JB, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Clinical evaluation of complete dentures made of 11 different types of denture base materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1965;70:1170-88. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1965.0208
  18. Wolff A, Gadre A, Begleiter A, Moskona D, Cardash H. Correlation between patient satisfaction with complete dentures and denture quality, oral condition, and flow rate of submandibular/sublingual salivary glands. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:45-8.
  19. Turker SB, Sener ID, Ozkan YK. Satisfaction of the complete denture wearers related to various factors. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009;49:e126-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2008.11.003
  20. Muller F, Wahl G, Fuhr K. Age-related satisfaction with complete dentures, desire for improvement and attitudes to implant treatment. Gerodontology 1994;11:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.1994.tb00096.x
  21. Carlsson GE. Bite force and chewing efficiency. Front Oral Physiol 1974;1:265-92.
  22. Haraldson T, Karlsson U, Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil 1979;6:41-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1979.tb00403.x
  23. Smith PW, McCord JF. What do patients expect from complete dentures? J Dent 2004;32:3-7.
  24. Vervoorn JM, Duinkerke AS, Luteijn F, van de Poel AC. Assessment of denture satisfaction. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988;16:364-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb00583.x
  25. Celebic A, Knezovic-Zlataric D, Papic M, Carek V, Baucic I, Stipetic J. Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:M948-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/58.10.M948

피인용 문헌

  1. 임플란트용 플라스틱 트레이를 이용하여 하악 흡착의치를 제작하는 방법 vol.59, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.36