DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of Anthropogenic Soil Formed from Paddy near the River

  • Sonn, Yeon-Kyu (Soil & Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Zhang, Yong-Seon (Soil & Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Hyun, Byung-Keun (Soil & Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Keun-Tae (Soil & Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Hoon (Soil & Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.05
  • 심사 : 2016.09.26
  • 발행 : 2016.10.31

초록

Anthropogenic soil in cropland is formed in the process of subsoil reversal and the refill of soil into cropland. However, there was little information on the chemical properties within soil profiles in anthropogenic soil under rice paddy near the river. In this study, we investigated the chemical properties within soil profiles in the anthropogenic soil located at 4 sites in Gumi, Kimhae, Chungju, and Euiseong to compare with the natural paddy soil near the river. Among particle sizes, the sand content decreased under soil profiles but the silt and clay contents increased compared to the natural paddy soil in soil profiles. Organic matter content in topsoil of anthropogenic soil was lower than in that of natural soil, which was shown the contrary tendency within soil profiles. Also, the soil pH, available $P_2O_5$, and exchangeable cations were higher in anthropogenic soil compared to natural paddy soil at topsoil, which was maintained these tendency into soil depth. Nutrients may be equally distributed in anthropogenic soil during the process of refill in paddy soil near the river. This results indicated that anthropogenic soil would contribute to carbon sequestration, the mitigation of compaction, and reduction of fertilizer application in paddy soil. Therefore, characteristics of anthropogenic soil can be used for the soil management in cropland.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bahman, E., G.D. Binford, and D.B. David. 1995. Phosphorus Movement and Adsorption in a Soil Receiving Long-Term Manure and Fertilizer Application. J. Environ. Qual. 25(6):1339-1343. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500060024x
  2. Brady, N.C. 1990. The nature and properties of soils (10th ed.). pp. 279-314. Macmillan Co., NY, USA.
  3. Brinkman, R. 1970. Ferrolysis, a hydromorphic soil forming process. Geoderma 3(3):199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(70)90019-4
  4. Fixen, P.E., A.E. Ludwick, and R.S. Olsen. 1983. Phosphorus and potassium fertilization of 316 irrigated alfalfa on calcareous soils: II Soil phosphorus solubility relationships. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:112-117. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700010023x
  5. Hong, J.K. and C.W. Hong. 1977. The characteristics of phosphorus in major Korean soils. I. The characteristics of inorganic phosphorus. J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 10(1):13-22.
  6. Lee, C.H., K.Y. Jung, S.S. Kang, M.S. Kim, Y.H. Kim, and P.J. Kim. 2013. Effect of long term fertilization on soil carbon and nitrogen pools in paddy soil. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 46(3):216-222. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2013.46.3.216
  7. Moore, P.A. and K.R. Reddy. 1994. Role of eH and pH on phosphorus geochemistry in sediments of Lake Okeechobee, Florida. J. Environ. Qual. 23:955-964.
  8. NIAST. 2000. Methods of soil and crop plant analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea.
  9. Prendergast, J.B. 1995. Soil water bypass and solute transport under irrigated pasture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59:1531-1539. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900060004x
  10. Sommer, S.G. and A.K. Ersboll. 1996. Effect of air flow rate, lime amendments and chemical soil properties on the volatilization of ammonia from fertilizers applied to sandy soils. Boil. Fert. Soils 21:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335993
  11. Stout, W.L., A.N. Sharpley, and J. Landa. 2000. Effectiveness of coal combustion byproducts in controlling phosphorus export from soils. J. Environ. Qual. 29:1239-1244.
  12. USDA, NRCS. 1996. Soil survey laborarory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No.42 (revised). USDA. NRCS, Washington.
  13. Vlek, P.L.G. and E.T. Craswell. 1979. Effect of N source and management on ammonia volatilization losses from flooded rice systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43:352-358. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300020023x
  14. Wang, Z.P., R.D. DeLaune, P.H. Masscheleyn, and W.H. Patrick. 1993. Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57(2):382-385. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020016x
  15. Wright, A.L. and K.R. Reddy. 2008. Catabolic diversity of periphyton and detritus microbial communities in a subtropical wetland. Biogeochem. 89:199-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9213-8
  16. Yang, C.H., T.K. Kim, J.H. Ryu, J.D. Kim, and K.Y. Jung. 2009. Soil characteristic of plow and compaction layer in fluviomarine deposit paddy soil. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 42(5):364-370.
  17. Zhang, M.K. and Z.L. He. 2004. Long-term changes in organic carbon and nutrients of an Ultisol under rice cropping in southeast China. Geoderma. 118:167-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00191-5