DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Behaviour and design of demountable steel column-column connections

  • Li, Dongxu (Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales) ;
  • Uy, Brian (Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales) ;
  • Patel, Vipul (School of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University) ;
  • Aslani, Farhad (Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales)
  • Received : 2016.02.04
  • Accepted : 2016.10.13
  • Published : 2016.10.10

Abstract

This paper presents a finite element (FE) model for predicting the behaviour of steel column-column connections under axial compression and tension. A robustness approach is utilised for the design of steel column-column connections. The FE models take into account for the effects of initial geometric imperfections, material nonlinearities and geometric nonlinearities. The accuracy of the FE models is examined by comparing the predicted results with independent experimental results. It is demonstrated that the FE models accurately predict the ultimate axial strengths and load-deflection curves for steel column-column connections. A parametric study is carried out to investigate the effects of slenderness ratio, contact surface imperfection, thickness of cover-plates, end-plate thickness and bolt position. The buckling strengths of steel column-column connections with contact surface imperfections are compared with design strengths obtained from Australian Standards AS4100 (1998) and Eurocode 3 (2005). It is found that the column connections with maximum allowable imperfections satisfy the design requirements. Furthermore, the steel column-column connections analysed in this paper can be dismantled and reused safely under typical service loads which are usually less than 40% of ultimate axial strengths. The results indicate that steel column-column connections can be demounted at 50% of the ultimate axial load which is greater than typical service load.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Australian Research Council (ARC)

References

  1. ABAQUS (2012), Analysis User's Manual; ABAQUS Standard, Version 6.12.
  2. An, Y.F., Han, L.H. and Zhao, X.L. (2012), "Behaviour and design calculations on very slender thin-walled CFST columns", Thin-Wall. Struct., 53, 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.01.011
  3. AS1170 (2002), AS1170-2002, Structural design actions; Standards Australia International Ltd.
  4. AS4100 (1998), AS4100-1998, Steel Structures; Standards Australia International Ltd.
  5. Gorgolewski, M. (2006), "The implications of reuse and recycling for the design of steel buildings", Can. J. Civil Eng., 33(4), 489-496. https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-006
  6. Green Building Council of Australia (2009), Green star overview, April. URL: www.gbca.org.au
  7. Eurocode 1, Part 1-7 (2006), Actions on structures - Accidental actions, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussel, Belgium.
  8. Eurocode 3, Part 1-8 (2005), Design of steel structures - Design of joints, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussel, Belgium.
  9. Hanus, F., Zilli, G. and Franssen, J.M. (2011), "Behaviour of Grade 8.8 bolts under natural fire conditions - Tests and model", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(8), 1292-1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.03.012
  10. Hassanein, M.F. and Kharoob, O.F. (2014), "Analysis of circular concrete-filled double skin tubular slender columns with external stainless steel tubes", Thin-Wall. Struct., 79, 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.01.008
  11. Lee, J., Goldsworthy, H.M. and Gad, E.F. (2010), "Blind bolted T-stub connections to unfileed hollow section columns in low rise structures", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(8-9), 981-992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.016
  12. Li, D., Uy, B. and Patel, V.I. (2015), "Behaviour of demountable CFST column-column connections", Proceedings of the 2015 International Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (ASEM15), Incheon, Korea, August.
  13. Lindner, J. (2008), "Old and new solutions for contact splices in columns", J. Constr. Steel Res., 64(7-8), 833-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.026
  14. Mago, N. and Hicks, S.J. (2016), "Fire behaviour of slender, highly utilized, eccentrically loaded concrete filled tubular columns", J. Constr. Steel Res., 119, 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.002
  15. Mirza, O. and Uy, B. (2011), "Behaviour of composite beam-column flush end-plate connections subjected to low-probability, high-consequence loading", Eng. Struct., 33(2), 647-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.024
  16. Snijder, B.H.H. and Hoenderkamp, H.J.D. (2008), "Influence of end plate splices on the load carrying capacity of columns", J. Constr. Steel Res., 64(7-8), 845-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.020
  17. Swedish Institute of Steel Construction (2005), Sustainability of steel framed buildings, SBI.
  18. Uy, B. (2014), "Innovative connections for the demountability and rehabilitation of steel", Space Composite Structures, Prague, Czech Republic.
  19. Uy, B., Patel, V.I. and Li, D. (2015), "Behaviour and design of connections for demountable steel and composite structures", Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Steel and Concrete Composite Structures, Beijing, China, December.
  20. Winters-Downey, E. (2010), "Reclaimed structural steel and LEED Credit MR-3 - Materials Reuse", Modern Steel Construction.

Cited by

  1. Analysis and design of demountable steel column-baseplate connections vol.22, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.4.753
  2. Behaviour and design of demountable CFST column-column connections under tension vol.138, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.08.027
  3. Behaviour and design of demountable CFST column-column connections subjected to compression vol.141, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.11.021
  4. Analysis of demountable steel and composite frames with semi-rigid bolted joints vol.28, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.3.363
  5. Experimental investigation of carbon steel and stainless steel bolted connections at different strain rates vol.30, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.6.551
  6. Design of a Novel Prefabricated Bolted I-Beam to Box-Column Connection Using Numerical Analysis Under Cyclic Load vol.19, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00222-6
  7. Behaviour and design of Grade 10.9 high-strength bolts under combined actions vol.35, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.3.327
  8. Design and Mechanical Performance Analysis of a New Type of Column-Column-Beam Prefabricated Steel Frame Joint vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2020.1824557
  9. Design and Mechanical Performance Analysis of a New Type of Column-Column-Beam Prefabricated Steel Frame Joint vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2020.1824557