Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Policy Components of Data Access and Use Controls in Research Data Repositories

연구데이터 레포지터리의 데이터 접근 및 이용 통제 정책 요소에 관한 연구

  • 김지현 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학전공)
  • Received : 2016.08.20
  • Accepted : 2016.09.06
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As Open Data has been emphasized globally, discussions on data policies have occurred for minimizing problems resulting from data sharing and reuse. This study aimed at investigating policy components for controlling access and use of data and examining similarities and differences of the policy components across disciplines. For the purpose, the study analyzed policy components for data access and use controls provided by 37 research data repositories overseas. These included twenty repositories in biological and health science, ten in chemistry, earth and environmental science and physics, as well as seven in social science and general science. The analysis showed that common policy components involve copyright/licenses, data citation, disclaimers and embargoes. However, there were differences in diversity of policy components among the disciplines and it indicated that the rationales of access and use controls emphasized would be different in the disciplines.

전 세계적으로 오픈 데이터가 강조되는 환경에서 데이터의 공유 및 재이용으로 인해 발생하는 문제점을 최소화하기 위한 정책적 논의도 함께 진행되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 연구데이터 레포지터리에서 데이터의 접근 및 이용을 통제하는 정책요소들을 조사하고 학문 분야별로 그러한 정책 요소들의 공통점과 차이점을 살펴보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 해외 연구데이터 레포지터리 37곳을 대상으로 데이터 접근 및 이용 통제를 규정하고 있는 정책 요소를 분석하였다. 생명과학 및 보건과학분야 20개 레포지터리, 화학 지구환경과학 물리학 분야 10개 레포지터리, 사회과학 및 일반과학 분야 7개 레포지터리로 구분하여 분석을 실시한 결과 저작권 및 라이선스 규정, 데이터 인용, 면책조항 및 엠바고 적용 관련 규정이 공통적으로 제시되는 정책 요소인 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 분야별로 규정되고 있는 정책 요소의 다양성에는 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났으며 이는 분야별로 강조되는 데이터 접근 및 이용 통제 근거의 차이를 반영하는 것으로 볼 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Creative Commons. 2016. CC0. https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/ [cited 2016.8.8].
  2. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Manghi, P., & Tani, A. (2015). Data journals: A survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1747-1762. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23358
  3. Doshi, J. A., Hendrick, F. B., Graff, J. S., & Stuart, B. C. (2016). Data, Data Everywhere, but Access Remains a Big Issue for Researchers: A Review of Access Policies for Publicly-Funded Patient-Level Health Care Data in the United States. eGEMs, 4(2). [cited 2016.8.8]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827788/
  4. Eschenfelder, K. R., & Johnson, A. (2014). Managing the data commons: Controlled sharing of scholarly data. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(9), 1757-1774. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23086
  5. Gitter, D. M. (2010). Application of Data Access Policies Designed for Genomewide Association Studies to Smaller Scale Databases. The John Marshall Law School Review of Intellectual Property Law, 10(3). [cited 2016.8.8]. http://repository.jmls.edu/ripl/vol10/iss3/3/
  6. Kaye, J., & Hawkins, N. (2014). Data sharing policy design for consortia: challenges for sustainability. Genome medicine, 6(1). [cited 2016.8.8]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24475754
  7. Nicol, A., Caruso, J., & Archambault, E. (2013). Open data access policies and strategies in the european research area and beyond. Science-Metrix. http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_EC_OA_Data.pdf [cited 2016.8.8].
  8. NIH. 2016. Certificate of Confidentiality. https://humansubjects.nih.gov/coc/index [cited 2016.8.8].
  9. OECD. 2015. Making open scienc a reality. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/making-open-sciencea-reality_5jrs2f963zs1-en [cited 2016.8.8].
  10. Paltoo, D. N., Rodriguez, L. L., Feolo, M., Gillanders, E., Ramos, E. M., Rutter, J., ... & Caulder, M. (2014). Data use under the NIH GWAS data sharing policy and future directions. Nature genetics, 46(9), 934. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3062
  11. Ramos, E. M., Din-Lovinescu, C., Bookman, E. B., McNeil, L. J., Baker, C. C., Godynskiy, G., ... & Starks, V. L. (2013). A mechanism for controlled access to GWAS data: experience of the GAIN Data Access Committee. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 92(4): 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.034
  12. Pampel, H., & Dallmeier-Tiessen, S. (2014). Open research data: From vision to practice. In Opening science (pp. 213-224). Springer International Publishing.
  13. Pampel, H., Vierkant, P., Scholze, F., Bertelmann, R., Kindling, M., Klump, J., ... & Dierolf, U. (2013). Making research data repositories visible: the re3data. org registry. PloS one, 8(11), e78080. [cited 2016.8.8]. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
  14. Scientific Data. 2016a. Data policies. [cited 2016.8.8]. http://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/data-policies#repo-suggest
  15. Scientific Data. 2016b. For Authors. [cited 2016.8.8]. http://www.nature.com/sdata/publish/for-authors#aims-scope
  16. Shabani, M., Knoppers, B. M., & Borry, P. (2015). From the principles of genomic data sharing to the practices of data access committees. EMBO molecular medicine, 7(5), 507-509. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201405002
  17. Sydes, M. R., Johnson, A. L., Meredith, S. K., Rauchenberger, M., South, A., & Parmar, M. K. (2015). Sharing data from clinical trials: the rationale for a controlled access approach. Trials, 16(1). [cited 2016.8.8]. https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-015-0604-6
  18. TNA. 2016. Open Government License for public sector information.[cited 2016.8.8]. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/