Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (한국지리정보학회지)

The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (한국지리정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the Spatial Distribution of Water Yield Service based on Precipitation and Population

강수량 및 인구인자를 반영한 수원함양서비스의 공간분포 평가

  • CHO, Heun-Woo (E3) ;
  • SONG, Chol-Ho (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • JEON, Seong-Woo (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • KIM, Joon-Soon (Department of Forest Management, Kangwon National University) ;
  • LEE, Woo-Kyun (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2016.04.22
  • Accepted : 2016.06.18
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study of ecosystem service assessment has been actively researched and developed from Millennium Ecosystem Assessment(MA) and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity(TEEB). However, current assessments are limited to monetary assessments of ecosystem function and do not account for the effects of environmental factors and socioeconomic status. This study proposes methods to evaluate ecosystem service based on environmental and socioeconomic factors. The study assesses water yield function through the water yield model in InVEST Tool, and evaluates the overall ecosystem service of water yield as reflected by the amount of precipitation and population of the area. Results show that a difference exists between spatial distributions of the ecosystem function of water yield derived from natural conditions such as land cover and soil, and the spatial distribution of the ecosystem service that accounts for climate and socioeconomic factors. The value of ecosystem service increases for an area of higher population and lower precipitation with similar water yield. Thus, the ecosystem service of water yield should be evaluated not only by the water yield function, but also by climate and socioeconomic factors. The evaluation process described for this study should also be applicable to the evaluation of ecological services in other sectors.

최근, 새천년생태계평가(MA: Millenium Ecosystem Assessment), 생태계와 생물다양성의 경제학(TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) 등의 체계에 따라 생태계서비스를 평가하는 연구가 활발히 이루어지고 있다. 그러나 기존 대부분의 연구에서는 생태계기능 평가량에 화폐적 가치를 곱하여 생태계서비스를 평가하고 있어 생태계서비스와 관련된 환경 및 사회경제적 조건을 반영하지 못하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 자연 및 사회경제적 요소를 반영한 생태계서비스 평가방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 우선, 수원함양기능을 InVEST의 Water Yield 모형을 통해 평가하였고 수원함양기능에 강수량과 인구를 반영하여 수원함양의 생태계서비스를 평가하였다. 평가결과, 토지피복, 토양 등의 자연조건을 반영한 수원함양기능과 강수량 및 인구 등의 기후 및 사회경제적 인자를 추가적으로 고려한 생태계서비스의 공간분포는 서로 다른 양상을 보였다. 즉, 같은 수원함양기능을 보인 지역이라도 강수량이 적고 인구가 많은 지역에서 수원함양의 생태계서비스가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 수원함양의 생태계서비스는 수원함양기능에 추가적으로 기상 및 사회경제적 인자를 고려하여 평가되어야 한다는 것을 제시하였으며, 평가과정은 다른 분야의 생태계서비스평가에 유용하게 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S.E. 2013. Definition and classification of ecosystem services for decision making. Journal of Environmental Policy 12(2):3-16 (안소은. 2013. 의사결정지원을 위한 생태계서비스의 정의와 분류. 환경정책연구 12(2):3-16).
  2. Burkhard, B., F. Kroll, S. Nedkov and F. Muller. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators. 21:17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
  3. Choi, H.A., W.K. Lee, C.H. Song. J.Y. Lee, S.W. Jeon and J.S. Kim. 2014. Applicability analysis of water provisioning services quantification models of forest ecosystem. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 17(4):1-15 (최현아, 이우균, 송철호, 이종열, 전성우, 김준순. 2014. 산림생태계 수자원 공급서비스 계량화 모형의 국내적용성 분석. 한국환경복원기술학회지 17(4):1-15). https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2014.17.4.1
  4. Chung, M.G. and H. Kang. 2013. A review of ecosystem service studies: concept, approach and future work in Korea. Journal of Ecology and Environment 36(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.001
  5. Collins, S.L., S.R. Carpenter, S.M. Swinton, D.E. Orenstein, D.L. Childers, T.L. Gragson, N.B. Grimm, J.M. Grove, S.L. Harlan, J.P. Kaye, A.K. Knapp, G.P. Kofinas, J.J. Magnuson, W.H. McDowell, J.M. Melack, L.A. Ogden, G.P. Robertson, M.D. Smith and A.C. Whitmer. 2011. An integrated conceptual framework for long -term social-ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9(6):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1890/100068
  6. Costanza, R., R. d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  7. Crossman, N. D., B. Burkhard, S. Nedkov, L. Willemen, K. Petz, I. Palomo, E.G. Drakou, B. Martin-Lopez, T. McPhearson, K. Boyanova, R. Alkemade, B. Egoh, M.B. Dunbar and J. Maes. 2013. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4:4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001
  8. de Groot, R. S., M.A. Wilson and R. M. Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41(3): 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  9. de Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein and L. Willemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7(3): 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
  10. Fisher, B., R.K. Turner and P. Morling. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68(3):643-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
  11. Frelichova, J., D. Vackar, A. Partl, B. Louckova, Z.V. Harmackova and E. Lorencova. 2014. Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services 8:110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001
  12. Jeon, S.W., J.U. Kim and H.C. Jung. 2013. A study on the forest classification for ecosystem services valuation - focused on forest type map and landcover map-. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 16(3):31-39 (전성우, 김재욱, 정휘철. 2013. 생태계 서비스 가치평가를 위한 산림 유형 분류 방안 -임상도와 토지피복지도 활용을 중심으로-. 한국환경복원기술학회지 16(3):31-39. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.3.031
  13. Kim, J.H., K.D. Kim, R.H. Kim, C.Y. Park, H.J. Yoon, S.W. Lee, H.T. Choi and J.J. Kim. 2010. A study on the estimation and the evaluation methods of public function of forest, research report 10-26. Korea Forest Research Institute. p.205 (김종호, 김기동, 김래현, 박찬열, 윤호중, 이승우, 최형태, 김재준. 2010. 산림의 공익기능 계량화 연구, 연구보고 10-26. 국립산림과학원. 205쪽).
  14. Kim, J.S. and S.Y. Park. 2013. A prediction and analysis for functional change of ecosystem in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 16(2): 114-128 (김진수와 박소영. 2013. 생태계 용역가치를 이용한 대한민국 생태계의 기능적 변화 예측 및 분석. 한국지리정보학회지 16(2):114-128). https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2013.16.2.114
  15. Lee, M.K. 2007. Opportunity cost for increasing watershed conservation function of forest -a case study of Sueo Dam catchment area in Mt. Baekun Jeollanamdo-. Master's Thesis, Seoul Nat'l Univ., Seoul, Korea. p.66 (이민경, 2007. 산림유역의 수원함양 유지.증진을 위한 기회비용 -전남 광양 진상면 수어지 유역의 사례를 중심으로-. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. 66쪽).
  16. MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington DC. p.917.
  17. Maes, J., B. Egoh, L. Willemen, C. Liquete, P. Vihervaara, J.P. Schagner, B. Grizzetti, E.G. Drakou, A.L. Notte, G. Zulian, F. Bouraoui, M.L. Paracchini, L. Braat and G. Bidoglio. 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services 1(1):31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004
  18. Ninan, K.N. and M. Inoue. 2013. Valuing forest ecosystem services: case study of a forest reserve in Japan. Ecosystem Services 5:78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.006
  19. Oh, D.H. and U.S. Yeo. 2011. Improvement of forest public functions in Busan: application of monetary valuation. Busan Development Institute. p.77 (오동하, 여운상. 2011. 산림의 가치평가를 통한 공익기능 향상 방안. 부산발전연구원. 77쪽).
  20. Ramirez-Andreotta, M.D, M.L. Brusseau, J.F. Artiola, R.M. Maier, A.J Gandolfi. 2014. Environmental research translation: enhancing interactions with communities at contaminated sites. Science of The Total Environment 497:651-664.
  21. SGIS(Statistical Geographic Information Service). URL: http://sgis.kostat.go.kr/contents/shortcut/shortcut_05.jsp(Acces sed December 1, 2016).
  22. Sharp, R., H.T. Tallis, T. Ricketts, A.D. Guerry, S.A. Wood, R. Chaplin-Kramer, E. Nelson, D. Ennaanay, S. Wolny, N. Olwero, K. Vigerstol, D. Pennington, G. WLonsdorf, C. Kennedy, G. Verutes, C.K. Kim, G. Guannel, M. Papenfus, J. Toft, M. Marsik, J. Bernhardt, R. Griffin, K. Glowinski, N. Chaumont, A. Perelman, M. Lacayo, L. Mandle, R. Griffin, and P. Hamel. 2014. InVEST tip user's guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford, p.320.
  23. Song, C., W.K. Lee, H.A. Choi, J. Kim, S.W. Jeon, and J.S. Kim. 2016. Spatial assessment of ecosystem functions and services for air purification of forests in South Korea. Environmental Science & Policy 63:27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.005
  24. Song, C.H., W.K. Lee, H.A. Choi, S.W. Jeon, J.U. Kim, J.S. Kim and J.T. Kim. 2015. Application of InVEST Water Yield model for assessing forest water provisioning ecosystem service. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 18(1): 120-134 (송철호, 이우균, 최현아, 전성우, 김재욱, 김준순, 김정택. 2015. 산림의 수자원 공급 생태계 서비스 평가를 위한 InVEST Water Yield 모형의 적용. 한국지리정보학회지 18(1):120-134). https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2015.18.1.120
  25. TEEB(The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. The economies of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Edited by Pushpam Kumar. Earthscan. London and Washington.
  26. Villamagna, A. M., P. L. Angermeier and E, M. Bennett. 2013. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecological Complexity 15: 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
  27. Wilson, M.A. and J.P. Hoehn. 2006. Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: the state-of-the art and science. Ecological Economics 60(2):335-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.015
  28. Yoo, S.M., W.K. Lee, Y. Yamagata, C.H. Lim, C.H. Song, H.A. Choi. 2015. Analyzing residential land use change and population density considering climate change using land use equilibrium model in Jeju. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 18(4):43-58 (유소민, 이우균, 야마가타 요시키, 임철희, 송철호, 최현아. 2015. 토지이용균형모델을 이용한 기후변화에 따른 제주도 지역의 주거용 토지이용변화와 인구 밀도 예측. 한국지리정보학회지 18(4):43-58). https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2015.18.4.043

Cited by

  1. Effect of National-Scale Afforestation on Forest Water Supply and Soil Loss in South Korea, 1971–2010 vol.9, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061017
  2. Application of the InVEST Model to Quantify the Water Yield of North Korean Forests vol.11, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080804