KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Definition of Environmental Cost and Eco-VE Model for Eco-VE of Construction Facility

건설시설물 친환경 VE를 위한 환경비용 및 친환경가치모델 정립

  • Received : 2016.08.04
  • Accepted : 2016.08.31
  • Published : 2016.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Paris Agreement of Climate Change seem affect to Korea eco-policy. Meanwhile the eco-design for reduce carbon emission have been applied in design phase of construction. However eco-design have applied passively except the project of eco-building system. For reflect eco-component in design, design VE that be appling to basic design and executing design phase of all construction project of over 10 billion should be use. But present applying VE Job Plan is reflecting partly eco-component, so the effect is small. Therefor new eco-VE development that reflect eco-elements to exist VE need. As the result of this study, the concept of environmental cost is defined to accounting. The calculation of the cost was using methods that apply $CO_2$ emission trading price, WTP, carbon productivity concept and carbon tax based on $CO_2$ emission. However, in order to apply eco-friendly VE at design phase, the model of new concept included carbon productivity concept is necessary. The eco-friendly VE model of new concept is model using $CO_2$ emission and potential environmental pollution index (PEPI). This study tried define eco-value model and environmental cost definition that become the major axle of eco-VE.

기후변화에 관한 파리협정(Paris Agreement)은 우리나라의 친환경정책에 많은 영향을 미칠 것으로 보인다. 그동안 건설공사의 설계단계에서 탄소발생량을 줄이기 위한 친환경설계가 적용되어 왔다. 그러나 친환경건축물 인증에 해당하는 프로젝트 외에는 소극적 적용에 그치고 있다. 설계에 친환경요소를 반영하기 위해서는 현재 100억 이상 모든 건설공사의 기본설계 및 실시설계단계에 적용되고 있는 설계VE(Value Engineering) 제도를 활용할 필요가 있다. 하지만 현재 적용되고 있는 VE Job Plan은 친환경 요소를 일부 반영하는데 그치고 있으므로 그 효과는 미미할 수 밖에 없다. 따라서 기존 VE 기법에 친환경요소를 반영한 새로운 형태의 친환경VE 기법의 개발이 필요하다. 연구의 결과 환경비용의 개념은 회계학적으로 정의되고 그 비용의 산정은 이산화탄소 배출량을 기반으로 하는 탄소세, $CO_2$배출권 거래가격, 지불의사금액, 탄소생산성 개념을 이용하는 방법이 많이 사용되고 있었다. 그러나 설계단계에서 친환경VE에 활용하기 위해서는 탄소생산성 개념을 포함한 새로운 개념의 모델이 필요하다. 새로운 개념의 친환경VE모델은 $CO_2$배출량과 잠재적환경오염지수를 사용하는 모델이다. 본 연구에서는 친환경VE의 한 축을 담당할 환경비용에 대한 개념과 친환경가치모델을 정립하고자 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, G. W. (2010). A Study on the Calculation of $Co_2$ Emissions and Environmental Cost according to Construction Waste, Master Thesis, Kyungpook university (in Korean).
  2. Cho, C. H. (2015). A study on Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Recognition on the Measurement & Disclosure of Environmental Preservation Expenses and Sustainable Management, Master Thesis, Seokyeong university (in Korean).
  3. Choi, J. W., Jung, H. Y. and Jang, S. Y. (2011). "Development of decision making model of measures on the decrease of traffic accident following implementation of intra-city bus by using AHP." Journal of The Korean Society of Civil Engineers D, KSCE, Vol. 31, No. 5D, pp. 679-687.
  4. Choi, P. H. (2005). A Study on the Development of a Computation Model for Environmental Cost using Life Cycle Assessment, Master Thesis, Suwon university (in Korean).
  5. Han, S. W. (2010). A Study on Carbon Dioxide Emission of Input Resources according to Construction Method in Construction Phase, Master Thesis, Graduate School University of Seoul (in Korean).
  6. Jang, D. W. (2012). Unit Data and Estimating Process of Co2 Emissions with Structural Work BoQ for Green VE, Master Thesis, Graduate School University of Seoul (in Korean).
  7. Kang, S. I. (2013). A Value Evaluation Model Considering Environmental Cost and Performance for Green VE, Master Thesis, University of Seoul (in Korean)
  8. Kim, H. K. (2008). Design VE/LCC, LCA Decision Making Method on Construction Industry, Master Thesis, Inchon university (in Korean).
  9. Kim, J. S. (2014). 1 Trillion Reduction Through Design Economic Review(VE) in MLIT, Available at : http://news.newsway.co.kr/view.php?tp=1&ud=2014012015405634437&md=20140120154342_AO (Accessed: July 13, 2016).
  10. Kim, M. H. (1999). Construction Management Engineering, Kimoondang, p. 602
  11. Kim, W. G. (2010). Korea Carbon Productivity Present Condition and Trend/Issue, E-KIET Industrial Economics Information, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade, Vol. 470, pp. 1-12.
  12. Lee, H. G. (2000). A Study on the corporate environmental accounting information measurement, Master Thesis, Hanyang university (in Korean).
  13. Lee, I. H. (2006). A Study on the green consumers' willingness to pay more for environmentally friendly products, Master Thesis, Chung-ang university (in Korean).
  14. Lee, J. D. (1999). A Study on the Environmental Accounting, Master Thesis, Kyonggi university (in Korean).
  15. Mckinsey Global Institute (2008). The Carbon Productivity Challenge : Climate Change and Sustaining Economic Growth, Mckinsey Global Institute (in USA)
  16. Noh, D. L. (2010). The Impact of Carbon Tax on Induced Technological Changes and Its Consequences on GDP, Master Thesis, Kyungwon University (in Korean).
  17. Park, K. N. (2000). A Study on Corporate Environmental Pollution Expenses, Master Thesis, Sangji university (in Korean).
  18. Park, K. T. (2007). Case Study of Total Cost Analysis of the Heat Source System in Building, Master Thesis, Hanyang university (in Korean).
  19. Yoon, J. E. and Lim, Y. H. (2011). "Study on correlation of green building certification system and guidelines-focused on LEED and sustainable building guidelines in the US." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, Vol. 27, No. 11, pp. 155-164 (in Korean).
  20. Yun, S. H. (2009). The Integrated Cost Analysis in the Environmental and Economic Feasibility of the Environmental Facilities, Master Thesis, Chung-ang university (in Korean).