DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cochleicola gelatinilyticus gen. nov., sp. nov., Isolated from a Marine Gastropod, Reichia luteostoma

  • Shin, Su-Kyoung (BK21PLUS Program in Embodiment: Health-Society Interaction, Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Eunji (BK21PLUS Program in Embodiment: Health-Society Interaction, Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Sungmi (BK21PLUS Program in Embodiment: Health-Society Interaction, Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Yi, Hana (BK21PLUS Program in Embodiment: Health-Society Interaction, Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University)
  • Received : 2016.04.29
  • Accepted : 2016.05.18
  • Published : 2016.08.28

Abstract

A yellow, rod-shaped, non-motile, gram-negative, and strictly aerobic bacterial strain, designated LPB0005T, was isolated from a marine gastropod, Reichia luteostoma. Here the genome sequence was determined, which comprised 3,395,737 bp with 2,962 protein-coding genes. The DNA G+C content was 36.3 mol%. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that the isolate represents a novel genus and species in the family Flavobacteriaceae, with relatively low sequence similarities to other closely related genera. The isolate showed chemotaxonomic properties within the range reported for the family Flavobacteriaceae, but possesses many physiological and biochemical characteristics that distinguished it from species in the closely related genera Ulvibacter, Jejudonia, and Aureitalea. Based on phylogenetic, phenotypic, and genomic analyses, strain LPB0005T represents a novel genus and species, for which the name Cochleicola gelatinilyticus gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is LPB0005T (= KACC 18693T = JCM 31218T).

Keywords

Introduction

As part of the study on culturable bacterial diversity in Korea, a flavobacteria-like strain was isolated. The preliminary identification results, based on a partial 16S rRNA gene sequence, indicated that the new isolate is closely related to the members of the genera Ulvibacter, Jejudonia, and Aureitalea in the family Flavobacteriaceae [2,17]. The genus Ulvibacter currently comprises three species: U. litoralis [13], U. antarcticus [4], and U. marinus [1]. Ulvibacter litoralis was isolated from the green alga, and U. antarcticus and U. marinus were isolated from seawater. The genus Jejudonia contains only one known species, J. soesokkakensis, and was isolated from brackish water [14]. The genus Aureitalea is also a monospecific genus, with A. marina as the type species, and was isolated from seawater [15]. All members of the genera Ulvibacter, Jejudonia, and Aureitalea isolated to date are of marine origin.

Current prokaryotic taxonomy is largely determined based on molecular biological data rather than phenotypic traits, in particular 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity and DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH). More recently, genome sequence-based in silico DDH is gradually replacing wet-lab-based DDH experiments. In the future, analysis of individual complete genome sequences is expected to replace a variety of time-consuming experiments. However, as analytical techniques and knowledge of bacterial genomes are advanced, accumulation of genomic data will be required for this switch. Thus, it is recommended that researchers currently investigating bacterial taxonomy produce highquality genome sequences, especially for type strains, to facilitate future analyses.

In this study, a novel bacterial strain, designated LPB0005T, was isolated and subjected to genomic and phenotypic investigation. The taxonomic status of the isolate was identified and its whole genome sequence was also determined.

 

Materials and Methods

Isolation

Strain LPB0005T was isolated from a marine gastropod, Reichia luteostoma, caught near Yeongheung Island, Korea (37°15’16.1’’N; 126°29’46.5’’E). The gastropod was ground and diluted with sterilized artificial seawater (ASW; Sigma, USA) and applied to marine agar 2216 (MA; BD, USA) using a standard dilution plating method. The isolate from the gastropod was routinely cultured on MA at 25℃ and preserved in a glycerol suspension (20% in DW (w/v)) at –80℃. For comparative taxonomic study, Ulvibacter litoralis CCUG 47093T, U. antarcticus NBRC 102682T, U. marinus KCTC 32322T, and J. soesokkakensis KCTC 32325T were selected as reference strains and obtained from corresponding culture collections.

Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial cells with a QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). The purified genomic DNA was evaluated on a 1% agarose gel to verify the absence of low molecular weight fragments and quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen ds DNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, USA). A paired-end library was generated and sequenced using a Nextera DNA sample prep kit (Illumina, USA) and a Miseq_PE_300 system (Illumina). Sequencing reads were then trimmed, the adapters were removed, and subsequent de novo assembly was performed using CLC Genomics Workbench 8.0. Gene annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [22]. The DNA G+C content of strain LPB0005T was calculated from the genome sequence.

16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analyses

The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal bacterial primers (27F, 5’-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3’ and 1492R, 5’-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94℃ for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94℃ for 40 sec, annealing at 55℃ for 45 sec, and elongation at 72℃ for 90 sec, with a final extension step at 72℃ for 7 min. The PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and DNA sequencing was performed using a 3730xl DNA analyzer (ABI). Primers 27F, 518F (5’-CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACG-3’), 907R (5’-CCGTCAATT CMTTRAGTTT-3’), and 1492R were used for sequencing. The resultant 16S rRNA gene sequence for strain LPB0005T was compared against 16S rRNA gene sequences of prokaryotic type strains with validly published names on the EzTaxon-e server (http://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/; [5]). Multiple sequence alignments were constructed using the EzEditor program [10]. Maximum-likelihood [9] and neighbor-joining [19] trees were inferred using the MEGA6 program [20]. Genetic distance was calculated using the Jukes–Cantor distance model [11], and the trees were evaluated using bootstrap analyses with 1,000 replicates [8]. A Bayesian tree was constructed using the MrBayes 3.2 program [18], using the General Time Reversible model with gamma-distributed rate variation. The program was run for 12,000,000 generations with a sample frequency of 100 and a burn-in of 1,000,000.

Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Characterization

The temperature (4℃, 10℃, 15℃, 20℃, 25℃, 30℃, 35℃, 40℃, 45℃, and 50℃) and NaCl concentration (0–5% (w/v) with 1% increments) ranges for growth were tested using MA and marine broth 2216 (MB; BD, USA) for up to 5 days. The pH range (pH 4–11 at increments of 0.5 pH units) for growth was determined using MB adjusted using the following buffering systems: citric acid/sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.0–5.5), KH2PO4/K2HPO4 (pH 6.0–8.5), or NaHCO3/Na2CO3 (pH 9.0–11.0). Growth under anaerobic conditions was determined after incubation for 4 weeks in an AnaeroPack (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Japan) on MA at 25℃. Cellular morphology was investigated by transmission electron microscopy after incubation on MA agar at 25℃ for 2 days. The colonial morphology, size, and color were examined using cultures grown aerobically on MA for 4 days. Gliding motility was observed by the hanging-drop method, as previously described [3]. The presence of flexirubin-type pigments was determined by flooding the cell mass taken from agar plates with 20% (w/v) KOH [2], and confirmed by examining the bathochromic shift of the absorbance spectrum (200–800 nm) of ethanol and alkaline-ethanol extracts of lysed cells [24]. The Gram stain reaction was tested using a Gram staining kit (Sigma), according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the non-staining KOH method [16]. Catalase activity was determined by bubble formation in a 3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide solution, and oxidase activity was investigated using color change in 1% (w/v) tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine (bioMérieux, France). Hydrolysis of adenine (0.5% (w/v)), agar (1.5% (w/v)), carboxymethylcellulose (CM-cellulose; 0.5% (w/v)), casein (0.5% (w/v)), chitin (0.5% (w/v)), ʟ-tyrosine (0.5% (w/v)), hypoxanthine (0.5% (w/v)), starch (0.2% (w/v)), xanthine (0.4% (w/v)), and Tween 20, 40, 60, and 80 (1% (w/v)) was tested using MA as the basal media, according to standard protocols [23]. The DNase test was conducted with DNase test agar (BD) fortified with 2.0% (w/v) NaCl. Other enzymatic activities and carbon source utilization were determined using the API 20NE and API ZYM kits (bioMérieux, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the exception that the strips were inoculated with bacterial suspensions in 2.0% (w/v) NaCl and incubated at 25℃.

Chemotaxonomy

Cells for polar lipids and isoprenoid quinone analyses were grown in MB for 2 days at 28℃, harvested, and lyophilized. The polar lipids were extracted and separated by two-dimensional TLC on silica gel 60 plates (10 × 10 cm, 0.25 mm thickness; Merck, Germany). Chloroform/methanol/water (65:25:4 (v/v)) was used in the first direction and chloroform/acetic acid/methanol/water (80:15:12:4 (v/v)) in the second direction [7]. The polar lipids were identified by spraying with molybdatophosphoric acid (for total lipids), phosphomolybdic acid (for phospholipids), ninhydrin (for aminolipids), and naphthol/sulfuric acid reagent (for glycolipids). Isoprenoid quinones were extracted from freeze-dried cells, purified by TLC, and separated by HPLC with a reverse-phase type Zorbax ODS column using acetonitrile/isopropanol (65:35 (v/v)) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min [6,12]. Cells for fatty acids analysis were grown on MA for 4 days at 25℃. Extraction of the fatty acid methyl esters and their gas chromatographic separation were performed using the Instant FAME method of the Microbial Identification System (MIDI) version 6.1 and the TSBA6 database.

 

Results and Discussion

Cells of strain LPB0005T were rod-shaped with rounded ends, with approximate dimensions of 0.3–0.7 × 1.0–2.3 μm (Fig. S1). Strain LPB0005T did not grow under microaerophilic or anaerobic conditions. Flexirubin-type pigments were not detected, unlike in the closely related species U. litoralis CCUG 47093T and U. antarcticus NBRC 102682T. The cellular pigment showed a UV-visible spectrum with absorption maxima at 452 and 478 nm. The results of other morphological, cultural, physiological, and biochemical analyses are presented in the species description and in Table 1.

Table 1.Strains: 1, Strain LPB0005T; 2, U. litoralis KCTC 12104T; 3, U. antarcticus NBRC 102682T; 4, U. marinus KCTC 32322T; 5, J. soesokkakensis KCTC 32325T. Data are from this study unless otherwise indicated. All strains were positive for the following characteristics: catalase, oxidase, alkaline phosphatase, leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, and acid phosphatase activities; hydrolysis of Tween 20, Tween 40, Tween 60, and Tween 80. All strains were negative for the following characteristics: production of H2S or indoles; decomposition of agar, chitin, esculin, hypoxanthine, or xanthine; assimilation of carbohydrates in the API 20NE kit; urease, arginine dihydrolase, lipase (C14), α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, or α-fucosidase activities. Abbreviations: +, positive; -, negative. aData from previous reports [1,4,13,14]. bData differ from previous report [13]. cData differ from previous report [4]. dData differ from previous report [1]. eData differ from previous report [14].

The 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses showed that strain LPB0005T is closely related to members of the genus Ulvibacter. The strain exhibited the highest sequence similarity to U. antarcticus NBRC 102682T (96.4%), followed by U. litoralis CCUG 47093T (95.5%), U. marinus KCTC 32322T (95.1%), J. seosokkakensis (94.9%), and Aequorivita viscosa (94.0%). Although the highest sequence similarity was observed between strain LPB0005T and U. antarcticus, the assignment of this strain to the genus Ulvibacter was not strongly supported by the phylogenetic trees. In the phylogenetic trees, strain LPB0005T was not clustered tightly with any known bacterial species (Fig. 1). In the neighbor-joining tree, strain LPB0005T was equidistant from the genera Ulvibacter and Jejudonia, branching between the two genera. In the maximum-likelihood tree, strain LPB0005T formed a cluster with J. soesokkakensis, but the relationship was unstable. In the Bayesian tree, strain LPB0005T formed a distinct phyletic line within the family Flavobacteriaceae, distinct from the other three genera Ulvibacter, Jejudonia, and Aureitalea. In all phylogenetic trees inferred in this study, the boundary between the two monospecific genera Jejudonia and Aureitalea and the genus Ulvibacter was unclear. Thus, the taxonomic relationship of the three genera and the demarcation of the genus Ulvibacter should be evaluated with more members of these genera that have been identified. At this point, it can reasonably be concluded that strain LPB0005T represents a novel genus, as it shows no solid relationship to any known bacterial genus.

Fig. 1.Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the phylogenetic relationship between strain LPB0005T and other related species. Aquimarina addita JC2680T (HQ596527) was used as an outgroup. The numbers at the nodes are given as percentages and represent the level of bootstrap support (>50%) based on 1,000 resampled data sets. Circles indicate that the corresponding nodes (groupings) were also recovered in the maximum-likelihood and Bayesian trees. Scale bar, 0.01 nt substitutions per position.

The major cellular fatty acids identified in strain LPB0005T were iso-C15:0 (20.3%), iso-C15:1 G (14.6%), iso-C16:0 3-OH (10.6%), and iso-C17:0 3-OH (15.0%), similar to the four reference strains (Table 2). The polar lipids were composed of phosphatidylethanolamine, three unidentified aminolipids, two unidentified phospholipids, and seven unidentified polar lipids, similar to those of other members of the genera Ulvibacter and Jejudonia (Fig. S2). The isoprenoid quinone was identified as menaquinone-6 (MK-6), which is the major quinone typical of Flavobacteriaceae.

Table 2.Strains: 1, Strain LPB0005T; 2, U. litoralis KCTC 12104T; 3, U. antarcticus NBRC 102682T; 4, U. marinus KCTC 32322T; 5, J. soesokkakensis KCTC 32325T. All data are from this study. Fatty acids with >1% abundance are shown. ND, not detected. aSummed features represent groups of two or three fatty acids that cannot be separated by the MIDI system. Summed feature 3 comprised C16:1ω6c and/or C16:1ω7c; Summed feature 9 comprised C16:0 10-methyl and/or iso-C17:1ω9c.

The genome of strain LPB0005T comprised 3,395,737 bp, and was composed of 216 contigs with 132× coverage. Of the 3,047 predicted genes, 2,962 were protein-coding genes and 38 were RNA genes (3 rRNA genes and 35 tRNA genes). The G+C content of the test strain was 36.3 mol%, similar to other species in the genus Ulvibacter (36.7–38.1 mol%) [13]. The majority of the protein-coding genes (1,696 genes, 57.26%) were assigned for putative functions, whereas the remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins (1,266 genes, 42.74%). The properties of the genome and the results of the relevant statistical analyses are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.Genome properties of strain LPB0005T.

The DNA G+C content, and the isoprenoid quinone, fatty acid, and polar lipid profiles of strain LPB0005T supported assignment of the strain to the family Flavobacteriaceae. However, its distinct phylogenetic placement within the family and the low levels of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities to other species [21] implied that strain LPB0005T represents a novel genus and species. A number of phenotypic characteristics, including growth ranges, the absence of flexirubin-type pigments, and differences in enzymatic properties clearly differentiated strain LPB0005T from closely related species in the genera Ulvibacter and Jejudonia. The polyphasic data presented here conclusively demonstrate that the test strain merits classification as a novel genus and species within the family Flavobacteriaceae. The name Cochleicola gelatinilyticus gen. nov., sp. nov. is therefore proposed for this isolate, with strain LPB0005T as the type strain.

Description of Cochleicola gen. nov.

Cochleicola (Co.ch.le.i´co.la. L. fem. n. cochlea snail; L. masc. suff. –cola, a dweller, inhabitant of; N.L. masc. n. Cochleicola inhabitant of snail)

Gram-reaction-negative and strictly aerobic. Does not produce flexirubin-type pigments or spores. The isoprenoid quinone detected is MK-6. Major polar lipids are phosphatidylethanolamine, three unidentified aminolipids, two unidentified phospholipids, and seven unidentified polar lipids. The major cellular fatty acids are iso-C15:0, iso-C15:1 G, iso-C16:0 3-OH, and iso-C17:0 3-OH. The DNA G+C content is 36.3 mol%.

The type species is Cochleicola gelatinilyticus. A member of the family Flavobacteriaceae in the phylum Bacteroidetes.

Description of Cochleicola gelatinilyticus sp. nov.

Cochleicola gelatinilyticus (ge.la.ti.ni.ly´ti.cus. N.L. n. gelatium, gelatin; Gr. adj. lutikos, able to dissolve; N.L. adj. lyticus dissolving; N.L. masc. adj. gelatinilyticus gelatin-dissolving)

Gram-reaction-negative, catalase- and oxidase-positive and strictly aerobic. Cells are non-motile, rods with rounded ends, approximately 0.3-0.7 × 1.0-2.3 μm. Colonies are yellow, convex, shiny, viscous, circular with entire margins, and approximately 1.0 mm in diameter after incubation on MA at 25℃ for 3 days. Cells do not glide on agar plates. Cells do not produce flexirubin-type pigments or spores. Grows at 4-35℃ (optimum, 25℃), pH 5.5-8.0 (optimum, pH 7.0), and 1.0-5.0% NaCl (optimum 2.0%). Hydrolyzes adenine, casein, gelatin, ʟ-tyrosine, starch, Tween 20, Tween 40, Tween 60, and Tween 80, but not colloidal chitin, CM-cellulose, DNA, esculin, hypoxanthine, or xanthine. Does not produce H2S or indole. Does not reduce nitrates to nitrites or nitrogen. Negative for glucose fermentation. Positive for activities of alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, acid phosphatase, and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, but negative for arginine dihydrolase, urease, β-galactosidase, esterase lipase (C8), lipase (C14), cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, or α-fucosidase. Does not assimilate any carbon source provided in the API 20NE kit as a sole carbon source. The isoprenoid quinone is MK-6. Major polar lipids are phosphatidylethanolamine, three unidentified aminolipids, two unidentified phospholipids, and seven unidentified polar lipids. The major cellular fatty acids are iso-C15:0, iso-C15:1 G, iso-C16:0 3-OH, and iso-C17:0 3-OH. The DNA G+C content is 36.3 mol%.

The type strain is LPB0005T (= KACC 18693T = JCM 31218T), isolated from a marine gastropod, Reichia luteostoma, caught near Yeongheung Island, Korea.

GenBank Accession Numbers

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and the genome sequence of Cochleicola gelatinilyticus LPB0005T are KU160139 and LRX00000000, respectively.

References

  1. Baek K, Jo H, Choi A, Kang I, Cho JC. 2014. Ulvibacter marinus sp. nov., isolated from coastal seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64: 2041-2046. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.062398-0
  2. Bernardet JF, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. 2002. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52: 1049-1070.
  3. Bowman JP. 2000. Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surfaces of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50: 1861-1868. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-5-1861
  4. Choi TH, Lee HK, Lee K, Cho JC. 2007. Ulvibacter antarcticus sp. nov., isolated from Antarctic coastal seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57: 2922-2925. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65265-0
  5. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW. 2007. EzTaxon: a Web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57: 2259-2261. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0
  6. da Costa MS, Albuquerque L, Nobre MF, Wait R. 2011. The extraction and identification of respiratory lipoquinones of prokaryotes and their use in taxonomy. Methods Microbiol. 38: 197-206.
  7. da Costa MS, Albuquerque L, Nobre MF, Wait R. 2011. The identification of polar lipids in prokaryotes. Methods Microbiol. 38: 165-181.
  8. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408678
  9. Felsenstein J. 1993, posting date. PHYLIP (phylogenetic inference package) version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington. [Online.]
  10. Jeon YS, Lee K, Park SC, Kim BS, Cho YJ, Ha SM, Chun J. 2014. EzEditor: a versatile sequence alignment editor for both rRNA- and protein-coding genes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64: 689-691. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.059360-0
  11. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules, pp. 21-132. In Munro HN (ed.). Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Academic Press, New York.
  12. Minnikin DE, Odonnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M, Schaal A, Parlett JH. 1984. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J. Microbiol. Methods 2: 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(84)90018-6
  13. Nedashkovskaya OI, Kim SB, Han SK, Rhee MS, Lysenko AM, Falsen E, et al. 2004. Ulvibacter litoralis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from the green alga Ulva fenestrata. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54: 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02757-0
  14. Park S, Lee JS, Lee KC, Yoon JH. 2013. Jejudonia soesokkakensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from the junction between the ocean and a freshwater spring, and emended description of the genus Aureitalea Park et al. 2012. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104: 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-013-9934-0
  15. Park S, Yoshizawa S, Inomata K, Kogure K, Yokota A. 2012. Aureitalea marina gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Flavobacteriaceae, isolated from seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62: 912-916. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.031450-0
  16. Powers EM. 1995. Efficacy of the Ryu nonstaining KOH technique for rapidly determining Gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 3756-3758.
  17. Reichenbach H. 1989. Order 1. Cytophagales Leadbetter 1974, 99AL, pp. 2011-2013. In Staley JT, Bryant MP, Pfenning N, Holt JG (eds.). Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore.
  18. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61: 539-542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  19. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
  20. Sohpal VK, Dey A, Singh A. 2010. MEGA biocentric software for sequence and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Int. J. Bioinform. Res. Appl. 6: 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBRA.2010.034072
  21. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. 1994. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44: 846-849. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-4-846
  22. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Ciufo S, Li WJ. 2013. Prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. In Beck J, Benson D, Coleman J, Hoeppner M, Johnson M, Maglott D, et al. (eds.). The NCBI Handbook. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD.
  23. Tindell BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. 2007. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics, pp. 330-393. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR (eds.). Methods for General and Molercular Microbiology. American Soceity for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  24. Weeks OB. 1981. Preliminary studies of the pigments of Flavobacterium breve NCTC 11099 and Flavobacterium odoratum NCTC 11036, pp. 108-114. In Reichenbach H, Weeks OB (eds.). The Flavobacterium-Cytophaga Group. Gesellschaft fur Biotechnologische Forschung, Weinheim.

Cited by

  1. Deinococcus rubrus sp. nov., a Bacterium Isolated from Antarctic Coastal Sea Water vol.27, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1609.09002
  2. Synonymy of Micropolyspora internatus and Saccharomonospora viridis and Emended Description of Saccharomonospora viridis vol.27, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1610.10033
  3. Polaribacter vadi sp. nov., isolated from a marine gastropod vol.67, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001591
  4. Flavobacterium gilvum sp. nov., isolated from stream water vol.67, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001594
  5. Flavobacterium crassostreae sp. nov., isolated from Pacific oyster vol.67, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001728
  6. Thalassotalea crassostreae sp. nov., isolated from Pacific oyster vol.67, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001923
  7. Hydrogenophaga crassostreae sp. nov., isolated from a Pacific oyster vol.67, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002244
  8. A report of 11 unrecorded bacterial species in Korea, isolated from Hapcheonho Lake and Jinyangho Lake vol.6, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12651/jsr.2017.6.3.207
  9. Paenibacillus crassostreae sp. nov., isolated from the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas vol.68, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002444
  10. Tenacibaculum todarodis sp. nov., isolated from a squid vol.68, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002692
  11. A report of 22 unrecorded bacterial species in Korea, isolated from Namhangang vol.7, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12651/jsr.2018.7.2.114
  12. Gramella salexigens sp. nov., isolated from seawater vol.68, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002850
  13. Flavobacterium magnum sp. nov., Flavobacterium pallidum sp. nov., Flavobacterium crocinum sp. nov. and Flavobacterium album sp. nov vol.68, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003067
  14. Phenylobacterium parvum sp. nov., isolated from lake water vol.69, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003284
  15. Limnobaculum parvum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater lake vol.69, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003401
  16. Sphingorhabdus lutea sp. nov., isolated from sea water vol.69, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003662
  17. Urechidicola croceus gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Flavobacteriaceae vol.70, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003966
  18. Mucilaginibacter celer sp. nov. and Aquirhabdus parva gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from freshwater vol.70, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004437
  19. Gemmobacter aquarius sp. nov., Runella rosea sp. nov. and Flavobacterium fluviale sp. nov., isolated from the Namhangang River system vol.70, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004455
  20. Poseidonibacter parvus sp. nov., isolated from a squid vol.71, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004590
  21. Valid publication of new names and new combinations effectively published outside the IJSEM vol.71, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004846
  22. Constantimarinum furrinae gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from saline volcanic rock aquifer (lava seawater) at Jeju Island, Republic of Korea vol.60, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-022-1468-6