정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.109-120
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정보영재 학생의 정보접근성 인식 향상을 위한 PBL 기반 수업 설계 및 적용

Design and Application of Problem Based Learning to Improve Awareness of Information Accessibility for Gifted Students in Computer Science

  • Kim, Hansung (Korea Education & Research Information Service)
  • 투고 : 2016.02.20
  • 심사 : 2016.04.19
  • 발행 : 2016.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문의 목적은 정보영재 학생들의 정보접근성 인식의 향상을 위한 교수학습법을 개발하여 적용한 후 그 효과를 알아보는 것에 있다. 실험수업에 적용된 모형은 문제중심학습(Problem-Based Learning: PBL)을 기반으로 설계하였으며 정보영재 42명(초등학생 22명, 중학생 20명)을 대상으로 하였다. 수업모형의 효과성을 측정하기 위해 정보접근성에 대한 필요성, 행동의지에 대한 인식을 사전/사후 검사를 통해 알아보고, 수업 후 실험수업에 대한 재미, 만족도, 몰입감에 대한 인식을 분석하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사전/사후 차이 분석 결과 수업 후 정보접근성에 대한 필요성 및 행동의지가 전반적으로 향상된 것을 볼 수 있었다. 이 중, 성별의 차이를 살펴보면 여학생들의 정보접근성에 대한 인식과 남학생의 행동의지가 향상된 것을 볼 수 있었다. 학교급에 따른 차이를 살펴보면 초등학생의 정보접근성에 대한 필요성과 중학생의 행동의지가 통계적으로 유의미하게 향상된 것을 볼 수 있었다. 둘째, 실험수업 후 학습자들의 재미와 만족도가 높게 나타난 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 다만, 몰입감은 상대적으로 낮게 나타나 향후 이를 보완하기 위한 다각적인 노력이 필요함을 알 수 있었다.

The purpose of this paper is to develop and apply instructional model to improve awareness of information accessibility for gifted students in computer science. The model applied to class is designed based on Problem-Based Learning(PBL). The class was for 42 students(22 elementary school students, 20 middle school students), and the questions, cognition of the necessity for accessibility, behavior intent for accessibility were given before and after class. Additionally, interest, satisfaction and flow were given after the class. The results of this study are as follows. Firstly, it shows a difference on the changes of cognition on the necessity and behavior intent. As a gender difference, specifically, it shows a difference on the cognition of female students's necessity and behavior intent of male students. As a class level difference, specifically, it statistically shows a meaningful difference on cognitive of the necessity of elementary school students and behavior intent of middle school students. Secondly, after class, it shows a high level of interest, satisfaction. But it shows a general level of flow, so various strategies should be developed for covering the flow level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alan (2011). PAPA revisited: A current empirical study of the mason framework. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(3), 117-123.
  2. Annalu Waller, Vicki L. Hanson, David Sloan (2009). Including Accessibility within and beyond Undergraduate Computing Courses. Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 155-162.
  3. Benyon (2001). The New HCI Navigation of Information Space. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(8), 425-430.
  4. Cho Hanyoung (2014). A Study on Ecosystem of Smart Divide and Digital Divide. The e-Business Studies, 15(6), 299-313.
  5. Choi Jeongim, Jang Kyungwon (2010). Teaching in PBL. Seoul: Hakjisa
  6. Christina L. C. (2011). The Effect of an Information Ethics Course on the Information Ethics Values of Students - A Chinese Guanxi Culture Perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 2028-2038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.010
  7. C. J. Liua, and S. C. Yanga (2012). Applying the Practical Inquiry Model to investigate the quality of students' online discourse in an information ethics course based on Bloom's teaching goal and Bird's 3C model. Computers & Education, 59(2), 446-480.
  8. D. J. Choi et al. (2010). Considering webaccessibility content creation techniques2.0. Korea Creative Contents Agency.
  9. H. Barrows, and A. Myers (1993). Problem-based learning in secondary schools, Unpublished monograph Springfield, IL. Problem based learning institute.
  10. Herman T. T. (2002). The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly is at Issue, and Why Does it Matter?. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015283808882
  11. Hong Soongoo, Kang Youngmoo, Lee Hyunmi, Cha Yoonsook (2011). Web Accessibility Education Trends and Discussion to Vitalize a Web Accessibility Education. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information System Research, 16(3), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2011.16.3.073
  12. Jang Jeounga (2005). Development of Reality Mirroring Model of Online PBL Design Model. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 43(2), 191-224.
  13. J. R. Rest (1979). Development in judging moral issues, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  14. Kang Youngmoo, Hong Soongoo, Park Seoungje, Lee Hyunmi (2010). Analysis of Perception on the Web Accessibility Education for Information Teachers of Vocational High Schools. The Journal of Korean Association of computer Education, 13(5), 39-49.
  15. Karen D. L., and Sue C. (1996). Decision Making and Computer Use. Communications of the ACM, 39(7), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1145/233977.233999
  16. K. Goodnough, and M. Cashin (2003), Fostering inquiry through problem-based learning. The Science Teacher, 70(9), 21-25.
  17. Kim Hansung, Kim Jonghye, Lee Wongyu (2010). The Development of Curriculum for Solving the Recognition of Digital Divide in Elementary and Secondary Schools. Secondary Education Research, 58(1), 177-201. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2010.58.1.177
  18. Kohlberg, L. (1981) Essays on moral development, vol. 1: The philosophy of moral development. New York: Harper & Row.
  19. Kreie, J. and Cronan, T. (1998). Judging What is Ethical or Unethical: There are Differences between Men and Women. Communications of the ACM, 41(9), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1145/285070.285084
  20. Kyung J. M., and Jeon, H. R. (2010). A Study on the Type of Using Internet and Information and Communication Ethics by College Students. Korean Consumption Culture Association, 13(2), 213-247.
  21. Lessig. L. (2000). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
  22. Lee Wongyu, Go Junghyeun (2007). The Research for Development of Curriculum for Solving the Recognition of Digital Dividein Elementary and Secondary Schools, NIA.
  23. M. A. Albanese, and S. Mitcjell (1993). Problem based learning:A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acadimic Medicine, 68(1), 53-81.
  24. Mason (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/248873
  25. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, National Radio Research Agency (2015). Korean Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1.
  26. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2013). A Guidelines of Information Accessibility and Convenience for Disable and Elderly Person.
  27. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, NIA (2015). 2014 The Survery on the Digital Divide Index and Status.
  28. Moon, Y. L., & Moon, M. H. (1993). A review of studies on the Korean adolescents' moral judgment development using the defining issues test(DIT). Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 43-57.
  29. NIA (2014). A Study on Improving Strategy for the Web/App Accessibility in a Mobile Convergence Environment, NIA.
  30. Paek Kihun, Bong Jinsook, Shin Youngtae (2015). An Empirical Study on the Factors and Resolution Methods of the Smart Divide of older Adults. Journal of KIISE, 42(10), 1207-1221. https://doi.org/10.5626/JOK.2015.42.10.1207
  31. Park Yangmi (2014). The Effects after Appling PBL(Problem-Based Learning) On-off Line in Design Class. Journal of Digital Design, 14(4), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2014.14.3.013
  32. R. Capurro (2005). Information ethics. CSI Communications, 28(12), 7-10.
  33. R. Fogarty (1997). Problem-Based Learning and other curriculum models for the multiple intelligences classroom, Arlington heights. IL: IRI SkyLight.
  34. Seo Hyungun (2014). Critical Discussion for Digital Divide Research. Jouranl of the Korea Contents Association, 14(11), 657-666. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.11.657
  35. Shin Hyewon, Ji Seongwoo (2014). A Normative Study on the Paradigm and Solution of the New Digital Divide in the Smart Media Era. Study on the American Constitution, 25(3), 171-203.
  36. Suk Imbok, Kang Echeol (2007). Development and Validation of the Learning Flow Scale. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.23.1.121
  37. Tanja Krunic, Ljiljana Ruzic-Dimitrijevic, Branka Petrovic, Robert Farkas (2006). Web Design Curriculum and Syllabus Based on Web Design Practice and Students' Prior Knowledge. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5(1), 317-335. https://doi.org/10.28945/250
  38. T. B. Lee, T. Jim, M. R. Burks, H. Christian, L. H. Shawn, K. Andrew, H. L. Patrick, L. Bruce, R. Bob, R. Richard, U. Mark, and W. Cynthia, Web Accessibility - Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance, Friends of ED.
  39. T. Lickona (1978). Moral Development and Moral Education. Knowledge and Development, 21-74.
  40. V. Clara (2010). Teaching Environmental Education through PBL: Evaluation of a Teaching Intervention Program. Research in Science Education - RES SCI EDUC, 1-14.
  41. Web Accessibility Initiative [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/WAI/
  42. Wikipedia[Online]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_accessibility