디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제14권8호
  • /
  • Pages.47-56
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

산림분야 기후변화대응 R&D사업에 대한 탐색적 성과분석 : 효율성 관점에서 DEA분석을 중심으로

An Exploratory Performance Analysis of The Forest Sector R&D Program

  • 문관식 (한국과학기술기획평가원 사업조정본부 생명기초사업실) ;
  • 임채홍 (고려대학교 정부학연구소) ;
  • 안경섭 (공주대학교 행정학과)
  • Moon, Kwan-sik (Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning) ;
  • Lim, Chae-hong (Institute of Governmental Studies in Korea University) ;
  • Ahn, Kyung-sup (Dept. of Public Administration, National Gong-ju University)
  • 투고 : 2016.07.01
  • 심사 : 2016.08.20
  • 발행 : 2016.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 산림분야 기후변화대응 R&D 사업을 통해 발생된 성과를 효율성 관점에서 분석하였다. 이를 위해 DEA(자료포락분석)를 활용하여 R&D 투자효과를 실증적으로 분석하였으며, 연구개발비와 인력 등의 투입(input)에 따라서 발생하는 과학적, 기술적, 사회적 성과의 산출(output) 및 결과(outcome)의 효율적 메카니즘을 규명하고, 세부 사업에서 어떠한 성과가 더 효율적으로 산출되는지를 심층적으로 분석하였다. Post-2012 온실가스 의무 감축 대응 산림정책 및 전략에 관한 연구과제가 과학적, 기술적, 사회적 성과에서 가장 참조 횟수가 많은 과제로 분석되어 가장 효율적인 것을 확인하였다. 이를 토대로 향후 R&D사업 추진의 핵심적 고려요소를 파악하고, 투자효과를 높일 수 있는 정책적인 시사점을 모색하였다.

This study is on the actual analysis of R&D investment effect through DEA in terms of efficiency resulted from forestry sector climate change response R&D project. Namely, it is clarifying the mechanism of the scientific, technological, social performance result and output, depending on research development cost, employment size as same input. Also, it is in-depth analysis on which performance operates more efficiently in any detailed business. With the study result, we seek political implications to enhance investment effect and core element to consider R&D business project in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. B. Kim, "Survey and analysis of R&D performance management and utilizing system in the major countries," Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, 2010.
  2. S. M. Park, “Empirical Analysis of DEA models Validity for R&D Project Performance Evaluation : Focusing on Rank Correlation with Normalization Index,” IE Interfaces, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 314-322, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7232/IEIF.2011.24.4.314
  3. J. H. Park, & J. B. Moon, “An Efficiency Analysis Using DEA for National R&D Program for Regional Industrial Technology,” Korean Industrial Economic Association, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 2047-2068, 2010.
  4. M. S. Bang, & H. J. Jung, “A Study on Efficiency of Regional R&D Program by Data Envelopment Analysis,” The Korea Local Administration Review, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 285-308, 2011. https://doi.org/10.18398/kjlgas.2011.25.3.285
  5. J. E. Ahn, et al., "Study on the National R&D projects and evaluation system," Korea Information Science Society, 339-341, 2015.
  6. S. J. Yoo, "Major International Case Issue Studies for Improved Performance Evaluation System," Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, 2011.
  7. G. W. Lee, "Study on the Assessment and Management System of Government Research and Development Project," Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, 2010.
  8. M. H. Lee, et al., “The Efficiency Analysis of Regional R＆D Investment,” Korean Industrial Economic Association, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 3365-3382, 2012.
  9. B. C. Lee, "Analysis of R&D efficiency and productivity for patent rights of the metropolitan cities and provinces in Korea," The Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 3, No. 2, 99-121, 2008.
  10. S. H. Lee, et al., "Ripple Effect Analysis of Regional Industry Technology Development Using DEA," The Journal of digital policy & management, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 1-11, 2011.
  11. S. R. Lee, et al., "R&D Efficiency through to Strengthen Scientific and Technological Capacity," KISTEP Issue Paper, 2009.
  12. J. J. Lee, "Investment Evaluation System of R&D Program for National R&D Efficiency," HRD Review, 2007.
  13. D. H. Jang, & K. M. Kang, “The Study on the Improvement of Patent Evaluating Indicator by Government R&D Performance Evaluation Index,” The Korea Association for Policy Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 65-91, 2014.
  14. S. W. Hwang, "Efficiency of National R&D Investment," Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2009.
  15. J. M. Lee, “Dynamic Efficiency Analysis of Korean HRD Programs using Data Envelopment Analysis,” The Journal of digital policy & management, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 63-71, 2012.
  16. J. M. Lee, “Efficiency analysis of government budget to HRD program in the field of information technology,” The Journal of digital policy & management, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 55-62, 2012.
  17. K. H. Choi, & J. K. Cho, "Case Study on the Jeollabuk-do Local Water Supply Efficiency by using DEA and Malmquist Index," The Journal of digital policy & management, Vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 571-580, 2014.
  18. K. H. Choi, et al., “Relative Efficiency and Statistical Analysis of Kimchi-related Manufacturers in Jeollabuk-do,” The Journal of digital policy & management, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 139-146, 2014.
  19. K. H. Choi, & H. J. Kwak, “A Reviews on the Performance Evaluation Based on Network Analysis and Super-Efficiency Analysis,” The Journal of digital policy & management, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 255-262, 2013.
  20. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, "2017 National Research and Development Performance evaluation plans," 2016.
  21. National Science & Technology Council, "The 3rd National R&D Performance Evaluation Plan," 2015.
  22. Anderson. J. E., "Public Policy-making. 3rd ed," N.Y.: Holt. Rinehart and Winston, 1984.
  23. Wholey. J. S., et al., “The Case for Performance Monitoring,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 604-610, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/977173
  24. Wildavsky. A., "Speaking Truth to Power: The art and Craft of Policy Analysis," Boston: Little. Brown and Company Inc, 1979.
  25. L. S. Kim, “Convergence of Information Technology and Corporate Strategy,” Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 17-26, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.6.017
  26. S. U. Bae, D. G. Kwag, E. Y. Park, “The Study of the Aviation Industrial Technology Convergence through Patent analysis,” Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 219-225, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.5.219