생태와환경 (Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment)

  • 제49권2호
  • /
  • Pages.147-152
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2288-1115(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1123(eISSN)
한국수생태학회 (The Korean Society of Limnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국립공원 생태계 건강성 평가 방법에 관한 연구

A Study on the Method of Ecosystem Health Assessment in National Parks

  • 오장근 (국립공원관리공단 국립공원연구원) ;
  • 원혁재 (국립공원관리공단 자원보전처) ;
  • 명현호 (국립공원관리공단 국립공원연구원)
  • Oh, Jang Geun (Division of Ecosystem Research, National Park Research Institute) ;
  • Won, Hyeok Jae (Department of Park Conservation, National Park Service) ;
  • Myeong, Hyeon-Ho (Division of Ecosystem Research, National Park Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.20
  • 심사 : 2016.06.29
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국립공원 생태계 건강성 평가 방법을 개발하기 위해 실시하였다. 국립공원 자원 모니터링 사업은 국립공원 생태계의 구성, 구조 및 기능의 현재 상태를 파악하고, 장기적인 경향성에 대해 과학적 정보를 개발하기 위함이다. 또한 지속 가능한 생태계를 유지하기 위해 과학적 관리방법을 결정하는 자료를 제공한다. 평가 결과는 공원 보전과 공원정책에 반영하고 국민과의 공감 기회를 확대할 수 있다. 건강성 평가 프로그램 절차는 목표 설정 및 개념 정립, 개념적 모델 개발, 프레임 설정, 평가 지표 선정, 평가등급 및 지수화, 건강성 평가 순으로 진행하였다. 건강성 평가 지표는 공통 지표, 선택 지표, 기후 지표 등 총 13개의 지표를 추출하였으며, 평가 결과의 시각화를 위해 픽토그램을 개발하였다. 건강상태를 5개 색깔로 구분하였으며, 과거의 상태와 비교하기 위해 3개의 도형으로 구분하였다. 건강성 평가를 실시한 결과 설악산, 오대산국립공원이 높게 평가되었으며, 북한산, 계룡산국립공원이 낮게 평가되었다.

This study was conducted to develop a technique of ecosystem health assessment on Korea National Parks. The purpose of natural resource monitoring in national parks is to develop scientific information on the current status and long term trends in the composition, structure, and function of park ecosystems, and to determine how well current management practices are sustaining those ecosystems. The evaluation results will reflect in the park conservation and polices and promote the effect and functions of assessment program to the people. Health assessment steps were performed in order the establishing monitoring goals and objectives, development of the conceptual model, frame establishment, determination of indicators, standard and classification and health assessment. Health Indicators were selected the 13 with common, choice and climate indicators. We developed a pictogram and was separated into five colors to health condition, it was divided into three shape for comparison with the past state. Seoraksan, Odaesan National Park has been rated highly but Bukhansan, Kyeryongsan National Park has been underestimated.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, D.Y., Y.P. Kim and K.G. An. 2008. Ecological Health Assessment of Mountainous Stream in Mt. Sik-Jang using Multi-metric Models. Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 24(2):156-163.
  2. Chae, Y.E., S.W. Kim, J.I. Kwak, Y.D. Yoon, S.W. Jeong and Y.J. An. 2015. A Comparative study of Assessment Techniques for Soil Ecosystem Health: Focusing on Assessment Factors of Soil Health. Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment 20(3):15-24. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2015.20.3.015
  3. Caughlan, L. and K.L. Oakley. 2001. Cost considerations for long-term ecological monitoring. Ecological Indicators 1:123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(01)00015-2
  4. Choung, Y.S. and K.E. Lee. 2013. Review of a Plant-Based Health Assessment Methods for Lake Ecosystems. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment 46(2):145-153. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2013.46.2.145
  5. Elzinga, C.L., D.W. Salzer and J.W. Willoughby. 1998. Measuring and monitoring plant populations. BLM Technical Reference 1730-1. BLM/RS/ST-98/005+1730. Bureau of Land Management, National Applied Resource Science Center. Denver, Colorade. 477 pp.
  6. Kim, Y.O., H.W. Choi, M.C. Jang, P.K. Jang, W.J. Lee, K. Shin and M. Jang. 2007. A brief review of approaches using planktonic organisms to assess marine ecosystem health. Ocean and Polar Research 29(4):327-337. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2007.29.4.327
  7. Korea National Park Service (KNPS). 2011. Action Plan for an Introduction of Ecosystem Health Standard Index System in Korea National Park. 16pp.
  8. Korea National Park Service (KNPS). 2012. Report on Development of Ecosystem Health Standard Index in Korea National Park. 33pp.
  9. Korea National Park Service (KNPS). 2016. Korea National Park Basic Statistics.
  10. Ministry of Environment and National Institute of Environmental Research (MOE and NIER). 2008. Waterwide Aquatic Ecological Monitoring Program (I), Ministry of Environment and National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  11. Ministry of Environment and National Institute of Environmental Research (MOE and NIER). 2010. Waterwide Aquatic Ecological Monitoring Program (III), Ministry of Environment and National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  12. Ministry of Environment and National Institute of Environmental Research (MOE and NIER). 2012. Waterwide Aquatic Ecological Monitoring Program (V), Ministry of Environment and National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  13. Myeong, H.H. 2010. On Conservation and Management Plan of Coastal Sand Dune Ecosystem using Health Assessment. PhD Dissertation. Mokpo National University. Muan. Korea.
  14. National Park Research Institute. 2014. Enhancement Study of Ecosystem Health Assessment on Korea National Park. National Park Research Institute. 138pp.
  15. National Park Service. 2012. Guidance for designing an integrated monitoring program. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/NRR-545. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.
  16. National Research Council. 1994. Review of EPA's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Forests and Estuaries. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  17. National Research Council. 2000. Ecological indicators for the nation. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  18. Roman and Barrett 1999. Conceptual framework for the development of long-term monitoring protocols at Cape Cod National Seashore.