Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy (식물분류학회지)

The Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists (한국식물분류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Taxonomic significance of the leaf micromorphology in the tribe Sorbarieae (Spiraeoideae: Rosaceae)

쉬땅나무족(조팝나무아과: 장미과) 잎표피 미세형태학적 형질의 분류학적 유용성

  • Song, Jun-Ho (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hong, Suk-Pyo (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University)
  • 송준호 (경희대학교 이과대학 생물학과) ;
  • 홍석표 (경희대학교 이과대학 생물학과)
  • Received : 2016.03.17
  • Accepted : 2016.06.02
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A comparative study of leaf epidermal microstructures in the tribe Sorbarieae (Adenostoma: 3 spp., Chamaebatiaria: 1 sp., Sorbaria: 11 spp., Spiraeanthus: 1 sp.) including related genera Gillenia (2 spp.) and Lyonothamnus (2 spp.) was carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in order to evaluate their significance in taxonomy. The leaves of Adenostoma, Chamaebatiaria, and Spiraeanthus were amphistomatic, whereas Gillenia, Lyonothamnus, and Sorbaria were hypostomatic. The size range of the guard cells is $7.84-48.7{\times}5.86-38.6{\mu}m$; the smallest one was found in Sorbaria tomentosa var. tomentosa ($7.84-11.8{\times}6.84-10.5{\mu}m$), while the largest measured example was Adenostoma fasciculatum var. obtusifolium ($30.3-48.7{\times}18.8-38.6{\mu}m$). Anomocytic stomata complex were the most frequent type (rarely cyclocytic), with usually both anomocytic and actinocytic types occurring in one leaf. On the surfaces, both the adaxial and abaxial anticlinal walls of the subsidiary cells vary (e.g., straight/curved, undulate, sinuate). Four types (unicellular non-glandular trichome, stellate, glandular trichome, pustular glandular trichome) of trichomes are found in the leaves. The epicuticular wax can be divided two types: membraneous platelets (Lyonothamnus) and platelets (Sorbaria arborea var. arborea, S. arborea var. subtomentosa, S. kirilowii, S. tomentosa var. tomentosa, Spiraeanthus schrenkianus). The trichome diversity (in particular, stellate, gland) and the existence of epicuticular wax may have taxonomic significance, although the leaf epidermal micromorphological characteristics do not provide synapomorphy in this tribe. These leaf micromorphological features are most likely better understood in the Sorbarieae when used in conjunction with external morphological characters.

쉬땅나무족(Adenostoma: 3 spp., Chamaebatiaria: 1 sp., Sorbaria: 11 spp., Spiraeanthus: 1 sp.)과 연관분류군인 Gillenia속 2분류군, Lyonothamnus속 2분류군을 포함한 총 20분류군의 잎 표피 미세구조에 대한 분류학적 유용성을 검토하고자 주사전자현미경(SEM)을 이용하여 관찰하고 기재하였다. Adenostoma속, Chamaebatiaria속, Spiraeanthus속에서 기공복합체(stomatal complex)는 향축면과 배축면 모두에 기공이 존재하는 양면기공엽(amphistomatic type)이었고, Gillenia속 Lyonothamnus속과 Sorbaria속에서는 배축면(abaxial side)에만 존재하는 이면기공엽(hypostomatic type)으로 나타났다. 공변세포의 크기는 $7.84-48.7{\times}5.86-38.6{\mu}m$으로 속과 종마다 다소 차이를 보이는데, Sorbaria tomentosa var. tomentosa ($7.84-11.8{\times}6.84-10.5{\mu}m$)가 가장 작은 공변세포로 나타났고, Adenostoma fasciculatum var. obtusifolium ($30.3-48.7{\times}18.8-38.6{\mu}m$)에서 가장 크게 나타났다. 기공복합체의 형태는 대부분 불규칙형(anomocytic)이 우세하며, 불규칙형과 방사형(actinocytic)이 모두 나타나거나 드물게 다륜형(cyclocytic)이 나타나는 분류군이 확인되었다. 부세포 수층벽(anticlinal wall)은 직선형과 곡선형이 동시에 관찰(straight/curved) 되거나 파상형(undulate) 또는 굴곡형(sinuate)이 관찰되었다. 연구된 분류군에서 나타나는 모용의 종류는 크게 4종류로 단세포단모(unicellular non-glandular trichome), 성상모(stellate), 선모(glandular trichome), 농포성 선모(pustular glandular trichome)가 확인되었다. 연구된 분류군 가운데 일부 분류군의 표피세포에서 막성 판(membraneous platelets), 판 모양(platelets)의 표피상납질(epicuticular wax)이 관찰되었다. 비록 잎 표피 미세형태학적 형질 내 본 족의 공유파생형질을 찾을 수 없었지만, 모용의 다양성(트기, 성상모, 선모)과 표피상납질 유무의 분류학적 유용성을 확인하였다. 잎 표피 내 다양한 미세형태학적 형질은 외부형태학적 형질과 더불어 본 족을 이해하는데 보다 유용한 정보를 제공할 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : 세계산 쉬땅나무족(조팝나무아과: 장미과) 및 근연분류군의 계통분류학적 연구: 외부형태학, 미세형태학, 해부학 및 분자계통학

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Aasamaa, K., A. Sber and M. Rahi. 2001. Leaf anatomical characteristics associated with shoot hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance and stomatal sensitivity to changes of leaf water status in temperate deciduous trees. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 765-774.
  2. Adebowale, A., Y. Naidoo, J. Lamb and A. Nicholas. 2014. Comparative foliar epidermal micromorphology of Southern African Strychnos L. (Loganiaceae): taxonomic, ecological and cytological considerations. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300: 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0865-z
  3. Agrawal, A. A., M. Fishbein, R. Jetter, J. P. Salminen, J. B. Goldstein, A. E. Freitag and J. P. Sparks. 2009. Phylogenetic ecology of leaf surface traits in the milkweeds (Asclepias spp.):chemistry, ecophysiology, and insect behavior. New Phytologist 183: 848-867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02897.x
  4. Anil Kumar, V. S. and K. Murugan. 2013. Taxonomic significance of foliar micromorphology and their systematic relevance in the genus Solanum (Solanaceae). In Prospects in Bioscience: Addressing the Issues. Sabu, A. and A. Augustine (eds.), Springer, India. Pp. 343-349.
  5. Baranova, M. 1972. Systematic anatomy of the leaf epidermis in the Magnoliaceae and some related families. Taxon 21: 447-469. https://doi.org/10.2307/1219106
  6. Barthlott, W., C. Neinhuis, D. Cutler, F. Ditsch, I. Meusel, I. Theisen and H. Wilhelmi. 1998. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 126: 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02529.x
  7. Beaulieu, J. M., I. J. Leitch, S. Patel, A. Pendharkar and C. A. Knight. 2008. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytologist 179: 975-986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02528.x
  8. Chang, C. S. and H. Kim. 2002. Overlooked and invalidly published names of Korean woody plants. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 32: 363-371.
  9. Cho, S. H., K. S. Jeong, S. H. Kim and J. H. Pak. 2014. Leaf cuticle micromorphology of Fagus L. (Fagaceae) species. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 7: 378-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2014.10.002
  10. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
  11. Croxdale, J. L. 2000. Stomatal patterning in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 87: 1069-1080. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656643
  12. De S-Haiad, B., A. C. C. Serpa-Ribeiro, C. N. Barbosa, D. Pizzini, D. D. O. Leal, L. de Senna-Valle and L. D. R. De Santiago-Fernandes. 2009. Leaf structure of species from three closely related genera from tribe Crotoneae Dumort. (Euphorbiaceae s.s., Malpighiales). Plant Systematics and Evolution 283: 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0229-x
  13. Deng, M., A. Hipp, Y. G. Song, Q. S. Li, A. Coombes and A. Cotton. 2014. Leaf epidermal features of Quercus subgenus Cyclobalanopsis (Fagaceae) and their systematic significance. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 176: 224-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12207
  14. Ensikat, H. J., M. Boese, W. Mader, W. Barthlott and K. Koch. 2006. Crystallinity of plant epicuticular waxes: Electron and X-ray diffraction studies. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 144: 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2006.06.016
  15. Eriksen, B. and B. A. Yurstev. 1999. Hair types in Potentilla sect. Niveae (Rosaceae) and related taxa, terminology and systematic distribution. Norske Videnskaps-Akademi Matematisk.-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse 38: 201-222.
  16. Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  17. Faghir, M. B., F. Attar, A. Farazmand, B. Ertter and B. Eriksen. 2010. Leaf indumentum types in Potentilla (Rosaceae) and related genera in Iran. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 79: 139-145.
  18. Faghir, M. B., K. K. Chaichi and R. S. Shahvon. 2014. Foliar epidermis micromorphology of the genus Alchemilla (Rosaceae) in Iran. Phytologia Balcanica 20: 215-225.
  19. Fehrenbach, S. and W. Barthlott. 1988. Mikromorphologie der Epicuticular wachse der Rosales s.l. und deren systematische Gliederung. Botanische Jahrbcher fr Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 109: 407-428.
  20. Ganeva, T. and K. Uzunova. 2010. Comparative leaf epidermis study in species of genus Malus Mill. (Rosaceae). Botanica Serbica 34: 45-49.
  21. Gostin, I. and L. Adumitresei. 2010. Micromorphological aspects regarding the leaves on some roses with emphasis on secretory glands. Journal of Plant Development 17: 29-36.
  22. Gu, C. and C. Alexander. 2003. Sorbaria. In Flora of China, Vol. 9. Wu, Z. Y., P. H. Raven and D. Y. Hong (eds.), Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing & St. Louis. Pp. 75-76.
  23. Heo, K. I., S. R. Lee, M. H. Yoo, S. T. Lee, Y. Kwon, S. Y. Lim, S. H. Kim and S. C. Kim. 2013. The taxonomic implication of trichome and epicuticular waxes in tribe Potentilleae (Rosaceae) in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 43: 106-117. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2013.43.2.106
  24. Hetherington, A. M. and F. I. Woodward. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424: 901-908. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01843
  25. Husain, S. Z., P. D. Marin, . Sillic, M. Qaiser and B. Petcovic. 1990. A micromorphological study of some representative genera in the tribe Saturejeae (Lamiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 103: 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1990.tb00174.x
  26. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The Genera of Flowering Plants, Vol. 1. Dicotyledones. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  27. Jepson, W. L. 1993. Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California, Berkeley.
  28. Jetter, R. and S. Schffer. 2001. Chemical composition of the Prunus laurocerasus leaf surface. Dynamic changes of the epicuticular wax film during leaf development. Plant Physiology 126: 1725-1737. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.4.1725
  29. Kaburaki, N. (鏑木德二). 1940. Chosen Sinrin Zumoku Yoran, Vol. 1. Mansen Zituyo Ringyo Binran (鮮滿實用林業便覽 第一編 朝鮮森林木要覽), 141, Yogendo(養賢堂), Tokyo(東京). P. 123. (in Japanese)
  30. Kalkman, C. 2004. Rosaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. VI. Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons: Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Kubitzki, K. (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Pp. 343-386.
  31. Kim, H., H. S. Lee, S. Park and C. S. Chang. 2005. Invalid names published by T. B. Lee. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 35: 211-226. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2005.35.3.211
  32. Kolodziejek, J. 2008. Hair types in Polish selected taxa of Potentilla subsect. Collinae (Rosaceae). Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 77: 217-224.
  33. Komarov, V. L. 1939. Flora of the U.S.S.R. Vol. 4. Rosales and Sarraceniales. Izdatel''stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Moscow, Leningrad. Pub. by Israel Program for Scientific Translations Ltd., Jerusalem.
  34. Lee, S. T. 2007. Sorbaria. In The Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea. Park, C.-W. (ed.), Academy Publishing Co., Seoul. Pp. 540-541.
  35. Lee, T. B. 1980. Illustrated Flora of Korea. Hyangmoonsa, Seoul. P. 426.
  36. Ma, Q. W., C. S. Li, F. L. Li and S. V. Vickulin. 2004. Epidermal structures and stomatal parameters of Chinese endemic Glyptostrobus pensilis (Taxodiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 146: 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00326.x
  37. Moon, H. K., S. P. Hong, E. Smets and S. Huysmans. 2009. Phylogenetic significance of leaf micromorphology and anatomy in the tribe Mentheae (Nepetoideae: Lamiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 160: 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00979.x
  38. Neinhuis, C. and W. Barthlott. 1997. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Annals of Botany 79: 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0400
  39. Potter, D., T. Eriksson, R. C. Evans, S. Oh, J. E. E. Smedmark, D. R. Morgan, M. Kerr, K. R. Robertson, M. P. Arsenault, T. A. Dickinson and C. S. Campbell. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 5-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9
  40. Rahn, K. 1989. A survey of the genus Sorbaria (Rosaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1989.tb01728.x
  41. Ramesar-Fortner, N. S., N. G. Dengler and S. G. Aiken. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity in leaves of four species of arctic Festuca (Poaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 1810-1823. https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-192
  42. Raven, P. H. 1963. A flora of San Clemente Island, California. Aliso 5: 289-347. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.19630503.08
  43. Roe, K. E. 1971. Terminology of hairs in the genus Solanum. Taxon 20: 501-508. https://doi.org/10.2307/1218251
  44. Roy, B. A., M. L. Stanton and S. M. Eppley. 1999. Effects of environmental stress on leaf hair density and consequences for selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 1089-1103. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00107.x
  45. Rydberg, P. A. 1908. Rosaceae. In North American Flora, Vol. 22. Britton N. L. and L. M. Underwood (eds.), New York Botanical Garden, New York. Pp. 239-292.
  46. Schulze-Menz, G. K. 1964. Rosaceae. In Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien II, 12th ed. Melchior, H. (ed.), Gebrder Borntraeger, Berlin. Pp. 209-218.
  47. Song, J. H. and S. P. Hong. 2014. The taxonomic implication of leaf anatomy in tribe Sorbarieae (Spiraeoideae: Rosaceae). Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 44: 119-131. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2014.44.2.119
  48. Stace, C. A. 1984. The taxonomic importance of the leaf surface. In Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy. Heywood, V. H. and D. M. Moore (eds.), Academic Press, London. Pp. 67-93.
  49. Sunami, T., K. Ohga., M. Muroi, H. Hayakawa, J. Yokoyama, K. Ito, S. Tebayashi, R. Arakawa and T. Fukuda. 2013. Comparative analyses of hairless-leaf and hairy-leaf type individuals in Aster hispidus var. insularis (Asteraceae). Journal of Plant Studies 2: 1-6.
  50. Taia, W. K. 2004. Leaf characters within tribe Trifolieae (family Leguminosae). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 7: 1463-1472. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.1463.1472
  51. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
  52. Thiers, B. 2015. (Continuously updated) Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. Available at: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/
  53. Tomaszewski, D. and J. Zielinski. 2014. Epicuticular wax structures on stems and comparison between stems and leaves-A survey. Flora 209: 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.03.001
  54. Wilkinson, H. P. 1979. The plant surface (mainly leaf). In Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, 2nd ed. Vol. I. Metcalfe C. R. and L. Chalk (eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford. Pp. 97-165.
  55. Wissemann, V. 2000. Epicuticular wax morphology and the taxonomy of Rosa (section Caninae, subsection Rubiginosae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 221: 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086384
  56. Yang, Z. R. and Q. Lin. 2005. Comparative morphology of the leaf epidermis in Schisandra (Schisandraceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 148: 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00396.x
  57. Zhou, Z. K., H. Wilkinson and C. Y. Wu. 1994. Taxonomical and evolutionary implications of the leaf anatomy and architecture of Quercus L. subgenus Quercus from China. Cathaya 7: 1-34.
  58. Zoric, L., L. Merkulov, J. Lukovic, P. Boza and D. Polic. 2009. Leaf epidermal characteristics of Trifolium L. species from Serbia and Montenegro. Flora 204: 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2008.02.002

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Petal Micromorphological Characteristics of the Tribe Sorbarieae (Rosaceae) vol.29, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2016.29.4.376
  2. The systematic implications of leaf micromorphological characteristics in the tribe Neillieae (Spiraeoideae, Rosaceae) vol.47, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2017.47.3.222
  3. Numerical taxonomic study of the genus Sorbaria (Ser.) A. Braun in Asch. (Rosaceae) vol.48, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2018.48.3.230
  4. The taxonomic implication of leaf micromorphological characteristics in the genus Aruncus (Rosaceae) vol.48, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2018.48.2.143
  5. Comparative petiole anatomy of the tribe Sorbarieae (Rosaceae) provide new taxonomically informative characters vol.36, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01702
  6. How diverse were ferns in the Baltic amber forest? vol.57, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12501