DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of the Orthographic Representation on Speech Sound Segmentation in Children Aged 5-6 Years

5~6세 아동의 철자표상이 말소리분절 과제 수행에 미치는 영향

  • Maeng, Hyeon-Su (Dept. of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University*) ;
  • Ha, Ji-Wan (Dept. of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University*)
  • 맹현수 (대구대학교 대학원 재활과학과) ;
  • 하지완 (대구대학교 대학원 재활과학과)
  • Received : 2016.05.01
  • Accepted : 2016.06.20
  • Published : 2016.06.28

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find out effect of the orthographic representation on speech sound segmentation performance. Children's performances of the orthographic representation task and the speech sound segmentation task had positive correlation in words of phoneme-grapheme correspondence and negative correlation in words of phoneme-grapheme non-correspondence. In the case of words of phoneme-grapheme correspondence, there was no difference in performance ability between orthographic representation high level group and low level group, while in the case of words of phoneme-grapheme non-correspondence, the low level group's performance was significantly better than the high level group's. The most frequent errors of both groups were orthographic conversion errors and such errors were significantly more noticeable in the high level group. This study suggests that from the time of learning orthographic knowledge, children utilize orthographic knowledge for the performance of phonological awareness tasks.

음운인식은 구어의 기본 단위인 말소리를 지각하고 조작하는 능력으로, 이것은 이후 문자습득에 영향을 주는 것으로 알려져 있다. 그러나 몇몇 연구에서는 문자의 기본 단위인 철자에 대한 지식이 반대로 음운인식에 영향을 준다고 주장한다. 본 연구에서는 5, 6세 아동을 대상으로 철자표상 과제와 말소리분절 과제를 실시한 후, 두 과제 수행력 간 상관관계, 철자표상 상위집단과 하위집단 간 말소리분절 과제의 정반응 점수, 그리고 오류유형을 비교 분석하였다. 그 결과 철자표상 과제와 말소리분절 과제 수행력은 자소-음소 일치 단어에서는 양의 상관, 불일치 단어에서는 음의 상관을 보였다. 자소-음소 일치 단어의 경우 두 집단 간 말소리분절 수행력에 차이가 없었지만, 자소-음소 불일치 단어의 경우 하위집단이 상위집단보다 말소리분절 수행력이 유의하게 좋았다. 두 집단 모두에서 가장 많이 나타난 오류는 철자화 오류였고, 이러한 경향은 상위집단에서 두드러졌다. 본 연구는 철자를 배우기 시작한 직후부터는 아동들이 말소리분절 과제 수행에 철자지식을 활용하고 있음을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Rayner, B. R. Foorman, C. A. Perfetti, D. Pesetsky and M. S. Seidenberg, "How psychological science informs the teaching of reading." Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 31-74, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.00004
  2. M. H. Kim and J. W. Ha. "Effects of auditory and visual presentation on phonemic awareness in 5- to 6- year-old children." Phonetics and Speech Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 73-82, 2016. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2016.8.2.073
  3. E. W. Ball, and B. A. Blachman. "Does phonemic awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and development spelling." Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 49-66, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.26.1.3
  4. S. Bouwmeester, E. H. van Rijen and K. Sijtsma. "Understanding phoneme segmentation performance by analyzing abilities and word properties." European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 95-102, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000049
  5. T. P. Hogan, H. W. Catts and T. D. Little. "The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness." Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 285-293, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/029)
  6. F. R. Manis, L. M. Doi and B. Bhadha. "Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders." Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vo. 33, No. 4, pp. 324-433, 2000.
  7. J. L. Anthony and D. J. Francis. "Development of phonological awareness." Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 255-259, 2000.
  8. A. Castles, K. Wilson and M. Coltheart. "Early orthographic influences on phonemic awareness tasks: Evidence from preschool training study." Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 108, pp. 203-210, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.006
  9. M. H. Kosmidis, K. Tsapkini, V. Folia, C. H. Vlahou and G. Kiosseoglou. "Semantic and phonological processing in illiteracy." Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Vol. 10, pp. 818-827, 2004.
  10. D. Perin, D. "Phonemic segmentation and spelling." British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 129-144, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01849.x
  11. R. A. Treiman and J. Baron. "Speech recoding in silent reading: A comparison of Chinese and English." Journal of Chinese Linguistics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 116-125, 1981.
  12. M. H. Cho. "The phonemic awareness and reading ability." The Korea Society for Children's Media, Vol. 1, pp. 119-135, 2002.
  13. S. J. Kim and J. Y. Shin. "Speech sound disorders." Seoul: SigmaPress, 2015.
  14. Y. T. Kim, G. H. Hong, K. H. Kim, H. S. Jang and J. Y. Lee. "Receptive & Expressive Vocabulary Test (REVT)." Seoul: Seoul Community Rehabilitation Center, 2009.
  15. Y. T. Kim and M. J. Shin. "Urimal Test of Articulation and Phonology (U-TAP)." Seoul: Hakjisa, 2004.
  16. H. S. Kim. "A study on vocabulary in elementary textbook." Seoul : The national institute of the Korean language, 2009.
  17. D. H. Kim, K. Y. Kim, S. B. Pyun, H. J. Lee and K. C. Nam. "Effects of orthographic and phonological similarity on Hangul word recognition: Processing difference between a control subject and an anomic aphasic." Communication Sciences and Disorders, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1-23, 2000.
  18. C. S. Lee, J. A. Kim and H. S. Nam. "Phonological awareness and word reading in the pre-school years." Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 5-27, 2008.
  19. H. J. Shin, H. J. Park and H. J. Jang. " The development of syllable and phonemic awareness abilities of children aged four, five, and six." Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 99-114, 2009.
  20. H. K. Yopp. "A test for assessing phonemic awareness in young children." Reading Teacher, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 20-29, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.49.1.3
  21. G. T. Howell and G. L Lacroix. " Decomposing interaction using GLM in combination with the COMPARE, LMATRIX and MMATRIX subcommands in SPSS." Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 10, pp. 1-22, 2012. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p001
  22. H. J. Kim and J. R Cho. "Phonological awareness, visual perception and reading of Hangul in preschool children." Korean Journal of Psychology: Development, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 15-28, 2001.
  23. H. K. Yoon. "A study on the 'Kulja-Reading' stage in Hangul acquisition." The Journal of Human Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 66-75, 1997.
  24. J. Vloedgraven and L. Verhoeven. "The nature of phonological awareness throughout the elementary grades: An item response theory perspective." Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 19, pp. 161-169, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.005
  25. R. K. Wagner, J. K. Torgesen and C. A. Rashotte. "Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study." Developmental Psychology, Vol. 30, pp. 73-87, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.73
  26. K. O. Lee and H. S. Park. "The Restoration of deep syllables and the role of syllables in Korean speech perception." Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Vol. 9, pp. 73-94, 1997.
  27. H. R. Park. "The characteristics of reading-related skills in poor comprehenders, poor readers and normal readers in Hangul." Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol, 13, No.3, pp. 295-304, 2015.