DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Thirteen Marker Components in Traditional Korean Formula, Samryeongbaekchul-san using an Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Equipped with Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry

  • Seo, Chang-Seob (K-her Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Hyeun-Kyoo (K-her Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.11.02
  • Accepted : 2015.12.02
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

For efficient quality control of the Samryeongbaekchul-san decoction, a powerful and accurate an ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry (MS) method was developed for quantitative analysis of the thirteen constituents: allantoin (1), spinosin (2), liquiritin (3), ginsenoside Rg1 (4), liquiritigenin (5), platycodin D2 (6), platycodin D (7), ginsenoside Rb1 (8), glycyrrhizin (9), 6-gingerol (10), atractylenolide III (11), atractylenolide II (12), and atractylenolide I (13). Separation of the compounds 1 - 13 was performed on a UPLC BEH $C_{18}$ column ($2.1{\times}100mm$, $1.7{\mu}m$) at a column temperature of $40^{\circ}C$ with a gradient solvent system of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous-acetonitrile. The flow rate and injection volume were 0.3 mL/min and $2.0{\mu}L$. Calibration curves of all compounds were showed good linearity with values of the correlation coefficient ${\geq}0.9920$ within the test ranges. The values of limits of detection and quantification for all analytes were 0.04 - 4.53 ng/mL and 0.13 - 13.60 ng/mL. The result of an experiment, compounds 2, 6, 12, and 13 were not detected while compounds 1, 3 - 5, and 7 - 11 were detected with 1,570.42, 5,239.85, 299.35, 318.88, 562.27, 340.87, 12,253.69, 73.80, and $115.01{\mu}g/g$, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Qiu, J. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 506-507. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2350
  2. Wang, L.; Zhou, G. B.; Liu, P.; Song, J. H.; Liang, Y.; Yan, X. J.; Xu, F.; Wang, B. S.; Mao, J. H.; Shen, Z. X.; Chen, S. J.; Chen, Z. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 4826-4831. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712365105
  3. Chen, H.; Wu, M.; Kubo, K. Y. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 142, 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.04.017
  4. Lee, S. R. Korean J. Orient. Physiol. Pathol. 2009, 23, 374-380.
  5. Heo, J. Dongeuibogam; Namsandang: Seoul, 2004, p 440.
  6. Yang, Q. H.; Xu, Y. J.; Liu, Y. Z.; Liang, Y. J.; Feng, G. F.; Zhang, Y. P.; Xing, H. J.; Yan, H. Z; Li, Y. Y. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014, 2014, 671013-671021.
  7. Yang, Q. H.; Xu, Y. J.; Feng, G. F.; Hu, C. F.; Zhang, Y. P.; Cheng, S. B.; Wagn, Y. P.; Gong, X. W. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 11, 213-221.
  8. Liu, X.; Jia, Y.; Iiu, Q.; Wu, J. Lishizhen Med. Mater. Med. Res. 2011, 22, 2671-2673.
  9. You, Y.; Liu, U.; Gao, S. Chinese J. Experiment. Trad. Med. Formulae 2012, 18, 136-140.
  10. Turner, R.; Stamp, L. K.; Kettle, A. J. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2012, 891-892, 85-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.02.009
  11. Ren, Y.; Wang, P.; Wu, C.; Zhang, J.; Niu, C. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2013, 27, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.2742
  12. Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; He, Y. Q.; Wang, C. H.; Welbeck, E. W.; Bligh, S. W.; Wang, Z. T. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22, 1767-1778. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3536
  13. Zhao, J.; Su, C.; Yang, C.; Liu, M.; Tang, L.; Su, W.; Liu, Z. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 64-65, 94-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2012.02.017
  14. Tan, G.; Zhu, Z.; Jing, J.; Lv, L.; Lou, Z.; Zhang, G.; Chai, Y. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2011, 25, 913-924. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.1544
  15. Na, Y. C.; Ha, Y. W.; Kim, Y. S.; Kim, K. J. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1189, 467-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.085
  16. Chen, L.; Qi, J.; Chang, Y. X.; Zhu, D.; Yu, B. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2009, 50, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2009.03.039