Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improving the Neutronic Characteristics of a Boiling Water Reactor by Using Uranium Zirconium Hydride Fuel Instead of Uranium Dioxide Fuel

  • Received : 2015.08.26
  • Accepted : 2016.01.06
  • Published : 2016.06.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present work discusses two different models of boiling water reactor (BWR) bundle to compare the neutronic characteristics of uranium dioxide ($UO_2$) and uranium zirconium hydride ($UZrH_{1.6}$) fuel. Each bundle consists of four assemblies. The BWR assembly fueled with $UO_2$ contains $8{\times}8$ fuel rods while that fueled with $UZrH_{1.6}$ contains $9{\times}9$ fuel rods. The Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport code, based on the Mont Carlo method, is used to design three dimensional models for BWR fuel bundles at typical operating temperatures and pressure conditions. These models are used to determine the multiplication factor, pin-by-pin power distribution, axial power distribution, thermal neutron flux distribution, and axial thermal neutron flux. The moderator and coolant (water) are permitted to boil within the BWR core forming steam bubbles, so it is important to calculate the reactivity effect of voiding at different values. It is found that the hydride fuel bundle design can be simplified by eliminating water rods and replacing the control blade with control rods. $UZrH_{1.6}$ fuel improves the performance of the BWR in different ways such as increasing the energy extracted per fuel assembly, reducing the uranium ore, and reducing the plutonium accumulated in the BWR through burnup.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Fratoni, E. Greenspan, Neutronic design of hydride fueled BWRs, Nucl. Eng. Des. 239 (2009) 1531-1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.01.016
  2. F. Ganda, C. Shuffler, E. Greenspan, N. Todreas, Economic analysis of hydride fueled BWR, Nucl. Eng. Des. 239 (2009) 1560-1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.02.024
  3. J.M. Paratte, R. Chawla, O.P. Joneja, S. Pelloni, C. Pralong, Validation efforts for the neutronics of a plutonium-erbiumzirconium oxide inert matrix water reactor fuel, J. Nucl. Mater. 274 (1999) 120-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(99)00086-0
  4. A.A. Galahom, I.I. Bashter, A. Moustafa, Analysis of neutronic characteristics of uranium zirconium hydride fuel in advanced boiling water reactor, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 3 (2013) 437-442.
  5. J.S. Hendricks, M.W. Johnson, LA-UR-08-1808. MCNPX26F extensions, Los Almos National Lab, 2008.
  6. K. Wang, E. Greenspan, Performance improvement analysis of boiling water reactors by incorporation of hydride fuel, Nucl. Eng. Des. 231 (2004) 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.03.008
  7. J.M. Sorensen, A.F. Dias, L.D. Eisenhart, BWR stability analysis: a comparison of point, one-dimensional, and threedimensional neutronic model methodologies, Proceedings from the 6th International RETRAN Conference, EPRI NP-6949, 1990, 21-19.
  8. A.A. Galahom, I.I. Bashter, A. Moustafa, Design boiling water reactor core model using MCNPX for studying the burnable poisons and the axial enrichment fuel effect on the neutronic characteristics, J. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 3 (2013) 7-21.
  9. A. Galperin, Utilization of light water reactors for plutonium incineration, Ann. Nucl. Energy 22 (1995) 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4549(95)95865-D

Cited by

  1. Ensuring the possibility of using thorium as a fuel in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) vol.32, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00981-0