Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Types and Sources of Background Knowledges of Elementary Preservice Teachers' Questions about Astronomy Contents in Elementary Science Text Books

초등 과학교과서 천문 내용에 대한 예비교사들의 질문의 배경지식 유형과 출처 분석

  • Received : 2016.03.10
  • Accepted : 2016.03.29
  • Published : 2016.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between types and sources of background knowledges of elementary preteachers' questions about astronomy contents in the elementary science text books. Data were extracted from the preteachers' classes established in a university of education. The results are as follows. First, right background knowledges of questions were found in about 58% questions, wrong background knowledges 15%, and no background knowledges 26%. Second, it was found that 'school' as a source of background knowledges was found in 29% questions, 'friend' 21%, 'internet' 14%, 'book reading' 12%, 'others' 9%, 'TV' 7%, 'institute' 4%. In case of the type that right background knowledges have casual relation or correlation with question contents, 'book reading' and 'TV' sources rate increased, but 'internet' and 'others' decreased when compared to total questions. In the type which background knowledges are right and did not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, 'internet' source rate increased and 'friend' decreased. In case of the type that wrong background knowledges do not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, 'friend' and 'TV' sources rate increased, but 'school' and 'book reading' decreased. The type which background knowledges are right and did not have casual relation or correlation with question contents, 'internet' source rate increased and 'friend' decreased. In case of the type of no background knowledges, 'TV' and 'institute' source rate increased, but 'internet' and 'book reading' decreased. Third, the questions in 'Earth and Moon' unit have little background knowledges. The questions in 'solar system and stars' have background knowledges with no relation to the questions. Especially, in the unit 'changes of seasons', right background knowledges were found in more than half questions, but the contents of questions and background knowledges were not connected scientifically.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1056-1068.
  2. Choi, K. H., Park, J. Y., Choi, B. S., Nam, J. H., Choi, K. S. & Lee, K. S. (2004). Analysis of verbal interaction between teachers and students in middle school science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(6), 1039-1048.
  3. Kang, H. S., Lee, S. M., Kwon, E. K. & Noh, T. H. (2006). The effects of weekly report as a method for encouraging student questions in the middle school science instruction. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(3), 385-392.
  4. Lee, G. & Yi, J. (2013). Where cognitive conflict arises from?: The structure of creating cognitive conflict. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 601-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9356-x
  5. Lee, M. J. (2014). The analysis of kinds, frequencies and cognitive backgrounds' sources of the pre-teachers' questions about the earth science knowledges of the elementary science texts. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 35(4), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2014.35.4.277
  6. Lee, M. J. (2006). Levels and patterns of main terms' interrelationships in students' notable questions about the contents of the elementary science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(1) 20-31.
  7. Matthews, M. R. (2000). Appraising constructivism in science and mathematics education. In D. C. Philips. Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  8. Oh, P. S. & Kim, C-J. (2005). A theoretical study on abduction as an inquiry method in earth science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(5), 610-623.
  9. Park, J. Y., Jong, I. W., Nam, J. H., Choi, K. H. & Choi, B. S. (2006) Development and application of a teaching strategy with reinforced teacher-student interactions through questions and feedbacks in the middle school science class. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(2), 239-245.
  10. Ryu, J. I., Han, K. L., Kim, H. N. & Park, K. T. (2006). Analysis of questioning strategies of elementary 3rd-6th science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 109-117.
  11. Wood, T. (1995). From alternative epistemologies to practice in education: Rethinking What it means to teach and learn. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.). Constructivism in education (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  12. Yim, I. S, Sung, H. I., Sohn, S. M., Ahn, Y. S., Kim, B. G. & Choe, S. U. (2005). The analysis of statistics and scientific inquiries types in Korea Astronomy and Space Institute Q&A Service. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 26(6), 551-524.

Cited by

  1. 초등 예비교사의 협력 과학수업이 과학교수효능감 및 과학지식에 미치는 효과 vol.9, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2016.9.3.341