Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제10권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1405-1428
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simplified methods for seismic assessment of existing buildings

  • Tehranizadeh, Mohsen (Department of Civil Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)) ;
  • Amirmojahedi, Maryam (Department of Civil Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)) ;
  • Moshref, Amir (Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University-Tafresh Branch)
  • 투고 : 2014.08.26
  • 심사 : 2016.05.18
  • 발행 : 2016.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Besides the complex instructions of guidance documents for seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, some institutions have provided simple criteria in terms of simplified rehabilitations. ASCE 41-06 is one of documents that introduced a simple method for assessment of certain buildings that do not require advanced analytical procedures. Furthermore the New Zealand guideline has presented a simple lateral mechanism analysis that is a hand static analysis for determining the probable collapse mechanism, lateral strength and displacement capacity of the structure. The present study is focused on verifying the results of the simplified methods which is used by NZSEE and ASCE 41-06 in assessment of existing buildings. For this, three different special steel moment and braced frames are assessed under these two guidelines and the accuracy of the results is checked with the results of nonlinear static and dynamic analysis. After comparison of obtained results, suggestions are presented to improve seismic retrofit criteria.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ATC-40 (1997), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Report No. ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  2. Borzi, B., Pinho, R. and Crowley, H. (2008), "Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for largescale assessment of RC buildings", Eng. Struct, 30(3), 804-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021
  3. Borzi, B., Vona, M., Masi, A., Pinho, R. and Pola, D. (2013), "Seismic demand estimation of RC frame buildings based on simplified and nonlinear dynamic analyses", Earthq. Struct., 4(2), 157-179. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.2.157
  4. Chen, L. (2011), "Innovative bracing system for earthquake resistant concentrically braced frame structures", MSc. Dissertation, Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  5. FEMA-P695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington.
  6. FEMA (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building, Report No. FEMA 273/274, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  7. FEMA (2000), Pre Standard Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report No. FEMA 356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  8. FEMA (2005), Improvement of Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Report No. FEMA 440, Federal Emergency Management Agency, California.
  9. Fox, M. (2015), "Development of a simplified displacement-based procedure for the seismic assessment of RC wall buildings", 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete, Greece.
  10. Grande, E. and Rasulo, A. (2013), "Seismic assessment of concentric X-braced steel frames", Eng. Struct., 49, 983-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.002
  11. Grande, E. and Rasulo, A. (2015), "A simple approach for seismic retrofit of low-rise concentric X-braced steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 107, 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.017
  12. Kam, W.Y., Akguzel, U., Jury, R.D. and Pampanin, S. (2013), "Displacement-based Seismic Assessment: Practical Considerations", New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, April.
  13. Ligneous, D., Putman, C. and Krawinkler, H. (2015), "Application of Simplified Analysis Procedures For Performance-Based Earthquake Evaluation of Steel Special Moment Frames". Earthq. Spectra .
  14. Minitab 15.1.1.0 (2007), Available at http://www.minitab.com/.
  15. Moshref, A. and Tehranizadeh, M. (2011a), "Verifying of Different Nonlinear Static Analysis Used for Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings by Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis", Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand.
  16. Moshref, A., Moghaddasi, S.M. and Tehranizadeh, M. (2011), "Comparison of different nonlinear static analysis used for seismic assessment of existing buildings", Proceedings of the 3th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Corfu, Greece.
  17. NZSEE (1996), New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, The Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Earthquake Risk Buildings, New Zealand.
  18. NZSEE (2002), New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, The Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Earthquake Risk Buildings, New Zealand.
  19. NZSEE (2006), New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, The Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Earthquake Risk Buildings, New Zealand.
  20. NZSEE (2006), The Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Earthquake Risk Buildings, New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand.
  21. OpenSees (2007), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation,University of California, Berkeley.
  22. Piazza, A. and Sullivan, T.J. (2014), "Development of a simplified displacement-based Procedure for the seismic design and assessment of RC Frame structures", Proceedings Of The 2th European Conference On Earthquake Engineering And Seismology, Istanbul, Augustus.
  23. Priestley, M.J.N. (1996), "Displacement-based seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings", Bull. NZSEE, 29(4), December.
  24. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kolwasky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-based seismic design of structures, IUSSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  25. SAP2000 (2006), Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Structures, Computers and Structures INC, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  26. Shafiee, N. and Tehranizadeh, M. (2015), "A displacement-based adaptive pushover method considering modal sign reversal for RC frame structures", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 24(18), 1003-1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1223
  27. Standard No. 2800-05(2005), Building and Housing Research Centre, Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, 3rd ed., Iran.
  28. Sullivan, T.J. (2013), "Highlighting differences between force-based and displacement-based design solutions for RC frame structures", Struct. Eng. Interna, 23(2), 122-131. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686613X13439149156958
  29. Sullivan, T.J. (2013a), "Simplified displacement-based seismic design of regular RC frame buildings", Proceedings of the XV Convegno L'Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, ANIDIS 2013, Padova, Italy.
  30. Tehranizadeh, M. and Yakhchalian, M. (2011), "Displacement based and consolidated force/displacement based methods for seismic assessment of steel moment resisting frames", Sci. Iran., 18(5), 1054-1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.08.002
  31. Urize, P. and Mahin, S.A. (2008), "Toward Earthquake-Resistant Design of Concentrically Braced Steel-Frame Structures", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering University of California, Berkeley, November.
  32. Vamvatsikos, D. and Fragiadakis, F. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(2), 1-16.
  33. Vamvatsikos, D., Jalayer, F. and Cornell, C.A. (2003), "Application of incremental dynamic analysis to an RC-structure", Proceedings of the FIB Symposium on Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions, Athens.

피인용 문헌

  1. Nonlinear response of acid storage tank coupled with piping attachment under seismic load for optimal safe design vol.18, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256301
  2. Determination of a unique aftershock spectra vol.22, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00276-6
  3. An energy-based approach to determine the yield force coefficient of RC frame structures vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.1.037