Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Damage potential of earthquake records for RC building stock

  • Received : 2016.02.15
  • Accepted : 2016.05.09
  • Published : 2016.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigates ground motion parameters and their damage potential for building type structures. It focuses on low and mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings that are important portion of the existing building stock under seismic risk in many countries. Correlations of 19 parameters of 466 earthquake records with nonlinear displacement demands of 1056 Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) systems are investigated. Properties of SDOF systems are established to represent RC building construction practice. The correlation of damage and ground motion characteristics is examined with respect to number of story and site classes. Equations for average nonlinear displacement demands of considered RC buildings are given for some of the ground motion parameters. Velocity related parameters are generally found to have better results than the acceleration, displacement and frequency related ones. Correlation of the parameters may be expected to decrease with increasing intensity of seismic event. Velocity Spectrum Intensity and Peak Ground Velocity have been found to have the highest correlation values for almost all site classes and number of story groups. Common parameter of Peak Ground Acceleration has lower correlation with damage when compared to them and some other parameters like Effective Design Acceleration and Characteristic Intensity.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Pamukkale University, Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)

References

  1. Akkar, S. and Bommer, J.J. (2007), "Empirical prediction equations for peak ground velocity derived from strong-motion records from Europe and the Middle East", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 97(2), 511-530. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060141
  2. Akkar, S. and Ozen, O. (2005), "Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(13), 1551-1571. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.492
  3. Algan, B.B. (1982), "Drift and damage considerations in earthquake resistant design of reinforced concrete buildings", Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
  4. ATC-40 (1996), Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Applied Technology Council, Washington DC, USA.
  5. Benjamin, J.R. (1988), "A criterion for determining exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake", EPRI Report NP-5930, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
  6. Bilgin, H. (2015), "Generation of fragility curves for typical RC health care facilities: emphasis on hospitals in Turkey", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000806, 04015056.
  7. Bindi, D., Massa, M., Luzi, L., Ameri, G., Pacor, F., Puglia, R. and Augliera, P. (2014), "Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 12(1), 391-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9525-5
  8. BiSpec (2011), Earthquake Solutions, http://www.eqsols.com/Pages/Bispec.aspx
  9. Boore, D.M. and Atkinson, G.M. (2008), "Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s", Earthq. Spectra, 24(1), 99-138. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2830434
  10. Boore, D.M., Stewart, J.P., Seyhan, E. and Atkinson, G.M. (2014), "NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes", Earthq. Spectra, 30(3), 1057-1085. https://doi.org/10.1193/070113EQS184M
  11. Cabanas, L., Benito, B. and Herraiz, M. (1997), "An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199701)26:1<79::AID-EQE624>3.0.CO;2-Y
  12. Cao, V.V. and Ronagh, H.R. (2014a), "Correlation between seismic parameters of far-fault motions and damage indices of low-rise reinforced concrete frames", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 66, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.020
  13. Cao, V.V. and Ronagh, H.R. (2014b), "Correlation between parameters of pulse-type motions and damage of low-rise RC frames", Earthq. Struct., 7(3), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.3.365
  14. Elenas, A. (1997), "Interdependency between seismic acceleration parameters and the behavior of structures", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 16(5), 317-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(97)00005-5
  15. Elenas, A. (2000), "Correlation between seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage indices of buildings", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 20(1), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00041-5
  16. Elenas, A. and Meskouris, K. (2001), "Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures", Eng. Struct., 23(6), 698-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00074-2
  17. Elenas, A., Liolios, A. and Vasiliadis, L. (1995), "Earthquake induced nonlinear behavior of structures in relation with characteristic acceleration parameters", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna.
  18. Elnashai, A. and Sarno, L.D. (2008), Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK.
  19. FEMA-356 (2000), Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, USA.
  20. FEMA-440 (2005), Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, USA.
  21. Gandomi, A.H., Alavi, A.H., Mousavi, M. and Tabatabaei, S.M. (2011), "A hybrid computational approach to derive new ground-motion prediction equations", Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 24(4), 717-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2011.01.005
  22. Gulkan, P. and Sozen, M.A. (1999), "Procedure for determining seismic vulnerability of building structures", ACI Struct. J., 96(3), 336-342.
  23. Inel, M., Ozmen, H.B. and Bilgin, H. (2007), "Modelling non-linear behavior of reinforced concrete members", Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol II: 207-216, Istanbul.
  24. Inel, M., Ozmen, H.B. and Bilgin, H. (2008), "SEMAp: modelling non-linear behaviour of reinforced concrete members", TUBITAK Project No: 105M024, Ankara, Turkey.
  25. Inel, M., Meral, E. and Ozmen, H.B. (2014), "Seismic displacement demands of low and mid-rise rc buildings with nonlinear static and dynamic analyses", Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, (Paper ID: 1286), Istanbul, Turkey.
  26. Jinjun, H.U., Wangcheng, W.U. and Lili, X.I.E. (2013), "Review and analysis of cumulative absolute velocity related parameters of ground motion", J. Earthq. Eng. Vib., 33(5), 1-8.
  27. Kadas, K., Yakut, A. and Kazaz, I. (2011), "Spectral ground motion intensity based on capacity and period elongation", J. Struct. Eng., 137(3), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000084
  28. Kaklamanos, J. and Baise, L.G. (2011), "Model validations and comparisons of the next generation attenuation of ground motions (NGA-West) project", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 101(1), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100038
  29. Kramer, S.L. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice- Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ.
  30. Kramer, S.L. and Mitchell, R.A. (2006), "Ground motion intensity measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation", Earthq. Spectra, 22(2), 413-438. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2194970
  31. Liao, W., Loh, C. and Wan, S. (2001), "Earthquake responses of RC moment frames subjected to near-fault ground motions", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 10(3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.178
  32. Miranda, E. (1999), "Approximate seismic lateral deformation demands in multistory buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 125(4), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(417)
  33. Moehle, J.P. (1992), "Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes", Earthq. Spectra, 8(3), 403-428. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585688
  34. Moehle, J.P. (1994), "Seismic drift and its role in design", Proceedings of the 5th US-Japan Workshop on the Improvement of Building Structural Design and Construction Practice, San Diego.
  35. Mohammadnejad, A.K., Mousavi, S.M., Torabi, M., Mousavi, M. and Alavi, A.H. (2012), "Robust attenuation relations for peak time-domain parameters of strong ground motions", Environ. Earth Sci., 67(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1479-9
  36. Moustafa, A. and Takewaki, I. (2012), "Characterization of earthquake ground motion of multiple sequences", Earthq. Struct., 3(5), 629-647. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.5.629
  37. Nanos, N., Elenas, A. and Ponterosso, P. (2008), "Correlation of different strong motion duration parameters and damage indicators of reinforced concrete structures", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Bejing.
  38. Nuttli, O.W. (1979), "The relation of sustained maximum ground acceleration and velocity to earthquake intensity and magnitude", S-71-1 Report 16, US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
  39. Ozmen, H.B., Inel, M., Akyol, E., Cayci, B.T. and Un, H. (2014), "Evaluations on the relation of RC building damages with structural parameters after May 19, 2011 Simav (Turkey) earthquake", Nat. Haz., 71(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0900-y
  40. Ozmen, H.B., Inel, M., Senel, S.M. and Kayhan, A.H. (2015), "Load carrying system characteristics of existing Turkish RC building stock", Int. J. Civ. Eng., 13(1), 76-91.
  41. Ozmen, H.B., Inel, M. and Cayci, B.T. (2013), "Engineering implications of the RC building damages after 2011 Van Earthquakes", Earthq. Struct., 5(3), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.3.297
  42. Ozdemir, G. and Bayhan, B. (2015), "Response of an isolated structure with deteriorating hysteretic isolator model", Res. Eng. Struct. Mater., 1(1), 1-10.
  43. Pankow, K.L. and Peckmann, J.C. (2004), "The SEA99 ground-motion predictive relations for extensional tectonic regimes: revisions and a new peak ground velocity relation", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 94(1), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030010
  44. PEER Database (2011), http://nisee.berkeley.edu/spl/, University of California, Berkeley.
  45. Rathje, E.M., Abrahamson, N.A. and Bray, J.D. (1998), "Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 124(2), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:2(150)
  46. Riddell, R. (2007), "On ground motion intensity indices", Earthq. Spectra, 23(1), 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2424748
  47. SAP2000, Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California, USA.
  48. Sarma, S.K. and Yang, K.S. (1987), "An evaluation of strong motion records and a new parameter A95", Earthq. Eng. Struct., 15(1), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150109
  49. Sabetta, F. and Pugliese, A. (1996), "Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motion", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86(2), 337-352.
  50. SeismoSignal (2011), Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions, Chalkida, Greece. http://www.seismosoft.com
  51. Sucuoglu, H. (1997), "Discussion of An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct., 26(12), 1283-1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199712)26:12<1283::AID-EQE704>3.0.CO;2-X
  52. Takizawa, H. and Jennings, P.C. (1980), "Collapse of a model for ductile reinforced concrete frames under extreme earthquake motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct., 8(2), 117-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290080204
  53. Theodulidis, N.P. and Papazachos, B.C. (1992), "Dependence of strong ground motion on magnitudedistance, site geology and macroseismic intensity for shallow earthquakes in Greece: I, Peak horizontal acceleration, velocity and displacement", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 11(7), 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(92)90003-V
  54. Travasarou, T., Bray, J.D. and Abrahamson, N.A. (2003), "Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias intensity", Earthq. Eng. Struct., 32(7), 1133-1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.270
  55. Tromans, I.J. and Bommer, J.J. (2002), "The attenuation of strong-motion peaks in Europe", Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper no. 394, London.
  56. Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC-2007) (2007), Specifications for buildings to be built in seismic areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara,Turkey.
  57. Uang, C.H. and Bertero, V.V. (1988), Implications of recorded earthquake ground motions on seismic design of buildings structures, Report No. UCB/EERC-88/13, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, California.
  58. USGS (2015), www.usgs.gov.
  59. Villaverde, R. (2007), "Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity of building structures: state of the art", J. Struct. Eng., 133(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(57)
  60. Von Thun, J.L., Rochim, L.H., Scott, G.A. and Wilson, J.A. (1988), "Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams", Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II - Recent Advances in Ground-Motion Evaluation, Geotechnical Special Publication, 20, 463-481.
  61. Wald, D.J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T.H. and Kanomori, H. (1999), "Relationships between peak ground acceleration peak ground velocity and modified Mercalli intensity in California", Earthq. Spectra, 15(3), 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586058
  62. Worden, C.B., Gerstenberger, M.C., Rhoades, D.A. and Wald, D.J. (2012), "Probabilistic relationships between ground motion parameters and modified Mercalli Intensity in California", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 102(1), 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110156
  63. Wu, Y.M., Hsiao, N.C. and Teng, T.L. (2004), "Relationship between strong motion peak values and seismic loss during the 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake", Nat. Haz., 32(3), 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000035550.36929.d0
  64. Wu, Y.M., Teng, T.I., Shin, T.C. and Hsiao, N.C. (2003), "Relationship between peak ground acceleration peak ground velocity and intensity in Taiwan", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93(1), 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020097
  65. Yakut, A. and Yilmaz, H. (2008), "Correlation of deformation demands with ground motion intensity", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 134(12), 1818-1828. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:12(1818)

Cited by

  1. Developing hybrid parameters for measuring damage potential of earthquake records: case for RC building stock vol.15, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0080-8
  2. Assessment and Rehabilitation Issues Concerning Existing 70’s Structural Stock vol.209, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/209/1/012100
  3. An Approach to Develop Compound Intensity Measures for Prediction of Damage Potential of Earthquake Records Using Canonical Correlation Analysis pp.1559-808X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1481157
  4. On the capacity of high, moderate and low earthquake frequency content to cause global drift ratio at level-2 of structural performance vol.258, pp.2261-236X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925805027
  5. Studying the Park-Ang damage index of reinforced concrete structures based on equivalent sinusoidal waves vol.72, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.1.083
  6. Some principles of generating seismic input for calculating structures vol.157, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015706021
  7. Identifying Optimal Intensity Measures for Predicting Damage Potential of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences vol.10, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196795
  8. Correlation between Ground Motion Parameters and Displacement Demands of Mid-Rise RC Buildings on Soft Soils Considering Soil-Structure-Interaction vol.11, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11030125