References
- Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1995). Reflections on a fifth-grade life science lesson: Making sense of children's understanding of scientific models. International Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170105
- Baker, V. R. (1999). Geosemiosis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 111(5), 633-645. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<0633:G>2.3.CO;2
- Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Boulter, C. J. (2000). Language, models and modeling in the primary science classroom. In J. K. Gilbert&C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education(pp. 289-305). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41-57). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Bruner, J. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Cheng, M. F., & Brown, D. E. (2015). The role of scientific modeling criteria in advancing students' explanatory ideas of magnetism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1053-1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21234
- Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-7
- Cho, H., Nam, J., & Lee, D. (2014). The development of argument-based modeling strategy using scientific writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 34(5), 479-490. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.5.0479
- Clement, J. J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of analogy, imagery, and mental simulation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Coll, R. K., & Lajium, D. (2011). Modeling and the future of science learning. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Models and modeling (pp. 3-21). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Geology as an historical science: Its perception within science and the education system. Science & Education, 12(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023096001250
- Forbes, C., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. (2015). Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd-grade students' model-driven explanation-construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 895-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21226
- Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4
- Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
- Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (1997). Learning science through models and modeling. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), The international handbook of science education(pp. 53-66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Halloun, I. (1996). Schematic Modeling for Meaningful Learning of Physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 1-26.
- Harlow, D. B., Bianchini, J. A., Swanson, L. H., & Dwyer, H. A. (2013). Potential teachers' appropriate and inappropriate application of pedagogical resources in a model‐based physics course: A "knowledge in pieces" perspective on teacher learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1098-1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21108
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000a). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1011-1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416884
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000b). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<352::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-J
- Jeon, S., Jung, J., & Park, J. (2014). An analysis of science magazine in the view of infographic. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 34(6), 601-611. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0601
- Khan, S. (2011). What's missing in model-based teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(6), 535-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9248-x
- Kim, M., & Kim, H. (2007). Analysis of high school students' conceptual change in model-based instruction for blood circulation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(5), 379-393.
- Kim, H., & Shin, D. (2014). Representation method of info graphic imagetelling - Focusing on the Peirce's Semiotics. Semiotic Inquiry, 39, 403-438.
- Kim, J., Kim, W., & Kim, Y. (2009). Effects of science conceptual model completion activity and science conceptual model modifying activity on middle-school students' achievement in science conceptual learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(1), 1-9.
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 635-679. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041003635
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2010). What kind of explanation is a model? In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 9-22). New York, NY: Springer.
- Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the co-development of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96(6), 1071-1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21030
- Mun, H., & Kang, D. (2015). Elementary school teachers' perception on infographics learning materials. Journal of Science education, 39(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.2.151
- National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Mental modeling in conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.) International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 391-416). London, UK: Routledge.
- Newsom, D., & Haynes, J. (2007). Public relations writing: Form & Style. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: Achieve, Inc.
- Noh, S. & Son, J. (2014). The effect of physics instruction using infographics based on visual thinking in high school. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 35(3), 477-485.
- Oh, P. (2007). Analysis of the manners of using scientific models in secondary earth science classrooms : With a focus on lessons in the domains of atmospheric and oceanic earth sciences. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(7), 645-662.
- Park, J., & Paik, S. (2004). The learning effect of teaching materials using computer animation of particulate model in elementary school science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(2), 116-122.
- Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learner. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
- Stavy, R. (1991). Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280404
- Smiciklas, M. (2012). The power of infographics: Using pictures to communicate and connect with your audiences. Indianapolis: Que Publishing.
- Vo, T., Forbes, C., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. (2015). Fostering third-grade students' use of scientific models with the water cycle: Elementary teachers' conceptions and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2411-2432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1080880
- Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
- Yoon, H. (2011). Pre-service elementary teachers' inquiry on a model of magnetism and changes in their views of scientific models. The Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 30(3), 353-366.
Cited by
- An Analysis of Infographics Used in Korean Optical Newspaper vol.22, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.4.341
- 과학과 미디어 기반 학습 관련 문헌 연구 vol.37, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.417
- 과학교육에서 모델과 모델링 관련 국내 과학 교육 연구 동향 분석 vol.37, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.4.539
- 고등학교‘생명과학 I’교과서에서 단원별 시각화 자료 특징의 비교 분석 vol.45, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.4.548
- 중학교 과학 교과서에서 과학 내용 영역에 따른 인포그래픽의 특징 분석 vol.41, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.3.462
- 초등 과학 수업에서 학생주도 인포그래픽 구성 활동의 효과 vol.39, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.5.625
- 초등 과학수업에서 학생들이 구성한 비주얼 씽킹의 유형 및 수업 효과 vol.40, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2021.40.1.100