DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Comparison of Measuring Methods and Development of Emssion Factor on Mercury from Large-Scale Emission Sources

대형배출원에서의 수은 측정방법 비교 및 배출계수 개발에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Hyung-Chun (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Rhok-Ho (Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Hyeon (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lim, Seung-young (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kang, Dae-Il (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Hong, Ji-Hyung (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Jang, Kee-Won (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 김형천 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 김록호 (국립환경과학원 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 김종현 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 임승영 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 강대일 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 홍지형 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 장기원 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과)
  • Received : 2015.12.01
  • Accepted : 2016.03.30
  • Published : 2016.04.30

Abstract

Recently, studies on reducing mercury have been actively conducted worldwide, which include the current status of mercury emissions and mercury control technology. Among the control technology, Sorbent Trap measurement method has been aggressively developed due to its reliability, easiness in measurement and analysis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the applicability of the new international measurement method; Sorbent Trap. For this, the study compared the Sorbent trap method (US EPA Method 30B) and the Korean Standard Method for Examination of Air (ES 01408.1) to evaluate their reliability, and developed mercury emission factors. As the result, the relative standard deviations (% RSD) of the two methods were 3.5~13.4% at Coal-fired Power Plants (CPP), 4.0~18.4% at Cement Kilns (CK), and 3.0~11.3% at Medical Waste Incinerators (MWI). The emissions factors were developed as 14.50 kg/ton at CPP, 45.10 kg/ton at CK, and 1,290.2 kg/ton at MWI.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (1999) Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound, and Total Mercury in Flue gas Generated from Coal-fired Stationary Sources.
  2. Jang, K.-W., H.-C. Kim, Y.-M. Lee, D.-J. Song, N. Jung, S.-K. Kim, J.-H. Hong, S.-J. Lee, and J.-S. Han (2011) Estimating PM Emission Factor from Coal-Fired Power Plants in Korea, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 27(5), 485-493. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2011.27.5.485
  3. Kim, H.-C., J.-M. Park, K.-W. Jang, S.-B. Lee, N.-E. Jung, D.-J. Song, J.-H. Hong, S.-J. Lee, and S.-K. Kim (2012a) A Study on the Development of the Mercury Emission Factor from Coal-fired Power Plant, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 28(2), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2012.28.2.172
  4. Kim, J.-H., J.-M. Park, S.-B. Lee, D. Pudasanee, and Y.-C. Seo (2010) Anthropogenic mercury emission inventory with emission factors and total emission in Korea, Atmos. Environ., 44(2010), 2714-2721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.037
  5. Kim, S.-K., K.-W. Jang, J.-H. Kim, C. Yoo, J.-H. Hong, and H.-C. Kim (2012b) SRF Combustion Pollutants' Impact on Domestic Emissions Assessments, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 28(6), 656-665. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2012.28.6.656
  6. Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2015) Clean Air Conservation Act.
  7. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2008) A study on Mercury Emissions of Air Pollutants Emissions Sources.
  8. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2010) A study on Intergrated Management of Mercury Using and Emission Facilities(I).
  9. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2011) A study on Intergrated Management of Mercury Using and Emission Facilities(II).
  10. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2012) A study on Intergrated Management of Mercury Using and Emission Facilities(III).
  11. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2013) International Joint Research on Anthropogenic Emission Sources for Prepareation of a Global Legally Binding Instrument on Mercury.
  12. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2013) Global Mercury Assessment.
  13. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1990) Method 101A-Determanation of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions from Sewage Sluge Incinerators.
  14. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010) Method 30B-Determanation of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission from Coal-fired Combustion Sources Using Carbon Sorbent Traps.
  15. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1996) Method 3052-Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Mercury Emission Characteristic and Comparison Tests for Applicability of Latest Mercury Measuring Methods : Focus on the Cement Kiln vol.33, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.3.241
  2. A Study on the Characteristics of Solid-Fuel Combustion vol.33, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.4.351