Computers and Concrete

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses for RC structures

  • Received : 2016.07.15
  • Accepted : 2016.09.30
  • Published : 2016.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete buildings using the pushover and incremental dynamic analysis method was investigated. A numerical study was performed for a reinforced concrete frame building. Pushover analysis according to uniform and triangular load shapes and incremental dynamic analyses were performed for selected building. For the nonlinear analysis, three ground motion records were selected to ensure compatibility with the design spectrum defined in the Turkish Seismic Code. The maximum response, dynamic pushover curve, capacity curves, interstorey drifts and moment rotation curves for various element ends of the selected building were obtained. Results were compared each other and good correlation was obtained between the dynamic analyses envelope with static pushover curves for the building.

Keywords

References

  1. Amirahmad, F. (2013), "Nonlinear dynamic analysis of modular steel buildings in two and three dimensions", Master Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto.
  2. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004), "Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(4), 497-522.
  3. Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R., Parisi, F. and Augenti, N. (2015), "Progressive collapse fragility of reinforced concrete framed structures through incremental dynamic analysis", Eng. Struct., 10(4), 65-79.
  4. Carvalho, G. Bento, R. and Bhatt, C. (2013), "Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses of reinforced concrete buildings - comparison of different modelling approaches", Earthq. Struct., 4(5), 451-470. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.5.451
  5. Chan, C.M. and Zou, X.K. (2004), "Elastic and inelastic drift performance optimization for reinforced concrete buildings under earthquake loads", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(8), 929-950. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.385
  6. Dolsek, M. and Fajfar, P. (2005), "Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames", Earthq Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.411
  7. Duan, H. and Hueste, M.B.D. (2012), "Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete frame building in China", Eng. Struct., 41, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.030
  8. Eslami, A. and Ronagh, H.R. (2014), "Effect of elaborate plastic hinge definition on the pushover analysis of reinforced concrete buildings", Struct. Des. Tall. Spec. Build., 23(4), 254-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1035
  9. Han, S.W. and Chopra A.K. (2006), "Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(15),1853-1873. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.605
  10. Inel, M. and Ozmen, H.B. (2006), "Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings", Eng. Struct., 28(11), 1494-1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017
  11. Jeong, S.H. and Elnashai, A.S. (2005), "Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3d pseudo-dynamic testing part i: analytical model verification", J. Earthq. Eng., 9(1), 95-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350535
  12. Kwon, O.S. and Kim, E. (2010), "Case study: Analytical investigation on the failure of a two-story RC building damaged during the 2007 Pisco-Chincha earthquake", Eng. Struct., 32(7), 1876-1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.022
  13. Louzai, A. and Abed, A. (2015), "Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(6), 1773-1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9689-7
  14. Mahmoud, S. (2014), "Blast load induced response and the associated damage of buildings considering SSI", Earthq. Struct, 7(3), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.3.349
  15. Mander, J.B. Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  16. Mwafy, A.M. and Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings", Eng. Struct., 23(5), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7
  17. Onat, O., Lourenco, P.B. and Kocak, A. (2015), "Experimental and numerical analysis of RC structure with two leaf cavity wall subjected to shake table", Struct. Eng. Mech., 55(5), 1037-1053. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.5.1037
  18. Onat, O., Lourenco, P.B. and Kocak, A. (2016), "Nonlinear analysis of RC structure with massive infill wall exposed to shake table", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 811-828. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.811
  19. Oncu, M.E., Yon, B., Akkoyun, O. and Taskiran, T. (2015), "Investigation of blast-induced ground vibration effects on rural buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(3), 545-560. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.3.545
  20. PEER Strong Motion Database, www.peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html
  21. Seismo Artif v2.1 - A computer program for generating artificial earthquake accelerograms matched to a specific target response spectrum, available online: www.seismosoft.com [July 19, 2013].
  22. Seismo Signal v5.1 - A computer program for the processing of strong-motion data, available at: www.seismosoft.com [July 19, 2013].
  23. SeismoStruct v7- A computer program developed for the accurate analytical assessment of structures, subjected to earthquake strong motion. Available online: www.seismosoft.com [September 8, 2014].
  24. Turkish Earthquake Code (2007), Ankara, Turkey.
  25. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  26. Yon, B. and Calayir, Y (2014), "Effects of confinement reinforcement and concrete strength on nonlinear behaviour of RC buildings", Comput. Concrete., 14(3), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.14.3.279
  27. Yon, B. and Calayir, Y (2015), "The soil effect on the seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete buildings", Earthq. Struct., 8(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.133
  28. Yon, B., O ncu, M.E. and Calayir, Y. (2015), "Effects of seismic zones and site conditions on response of RC buildings", Gradevinar., 67(6), 585-596.