DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Efficiency of VSP(Venture Support Policy) from the Concept of 'Ease of Use' and 'Experience' Perspective, Using Integrated Model with TRA and TAM

TAM 및 TRA을 기반으로 한 '용이성'과 '경험'의 관점에서 벤처지원 정책의 효율성 연구

  • Kim, In Sue (Center for Science-based Entrepreneurship, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • 김인수 (KAIST(한국과학기술원) 기업가정신연구센터)
  • Received : 2016.01.04
  • Accepted : 2016.01.18
  • Published : 2016.01.31

Abstract

This study is to examine constructs influencing the acceptance of SMEs for VSPs and the efficiency of VSPs, based on the two theories theory of reasoned action (TRA) and technology acceptance model (TAM) in the context of venture support program in Korea. This study concentrates on the government's venture support policy (VSP), namely the examination of the efficiency of current government VSPs in terms of preferential treatment for SMEs experiencing many other venture support programs (the EXP policy), and the reduction of documents/processes related to venture support programs for SMEs so that they are easily accessible and implementable (the EASE policy). Additionally, this paper will suggest an effective way to encourage SMEs to succeed by analyzing the fundamental reasons for their acceptance of VSPs to attain their long-term goals.

본 합리적 행동이론(TRA)과 기술수용이론 (TAM)을 기반으로, SMEs가 벤처지원정책을 수용하는 요인이 무엇인지를 밝히고, 정부가 효율적 방법으로 정책 지원하고 있는지를 알아보며, 지속성의 관점에서 SMEs를 위한, 효율적인 벤처정책 지원 방향을 제시하고 있다. 주요 결과를 살펴보면, 첫째, Experience가 Ease of Use에 영향이 있었고, 둘째, EASE of Use가 Usefulness는 영향이 있지만, Intention to Use에 대하여 영향이 없었으며, 셋째, Usefulness가 Intention to Use 에 직접적 매우 강한 영향을 미치고 있을 뿐 아니라, 다른 많은 변수를 매개하고 있다는 것을 알 수 있다. 한편, 정책 수용 의지 (Intention to use)에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석한 결과, Output Quality가 Usefulness에 영향을 미치고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이는 정책수행의 결과가 선택하고 수행 할 때는 기업 입장에서 이해득실에 대한 많은 것을 고려 하고 있는 지극히 이성적으로 행동하는 기업이라는 것을 알 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. V. Venkatesh, and F. D. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies", Management Science, 46(2), pp.186-204, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  2. F. D. Davis, "A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results, Unpublished Thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology", Sloan School of Management, 1985.
  3. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R., Warshaw, "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), pp.1111-1132, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  4. L. R. Beach, and T. R. Mitchell, "'Image Theory, the Unifying Perspective", 1996.
  5. L. R. Beach, and T. R. Mitchell, "The Basics of Image Theory", Image Theory: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, pp.3-18, 1998.
  6. D. Kieras, and P. G. Polson, "An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity", International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(4), pp.365-394, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80045-6
  7. P. G. Polson, "A Quantitative Theory of Human -Computer Interaction", translated by MIT Press, pp.184-235, 1987.
  8. M. J. Burke, A. P. Brief, J. M. George, L. Roberson, and J. Webster, "Measuring Affect at Work: Confirmatory Analyses of Competing Mood Structures with Conceptual Linkage to Cortical Regulatory Systems", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), p.1091, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1091
  9. D. Leonard-Barton, and I. Deschamps, "Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology", Management Science, 34(10), pp.1252-1265, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.10.1252
  10. I. Vessey, and D. Galletta, "Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition", Information Systems Research, 2(1), pp.63-84, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.63
  11. J. Hartwick, and H. Barki, "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use", Management Science, 40(4), pp.440-465, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440
  12. D. L. Goodhue, and R. L. Thompson, "Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance", Mis Quarterly, pp.213-236, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
  13. G. C. Moore, and I. Benbasat, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation", Information Systems Research, 2(3), pp.192-222, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  14. H. C. Kelman, "Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change", The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), pp.51-60, 1958. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106
  15. P. M. Blau, "Exchange and Power in Social Life, Transaction Publishers", 1964.
  16. C. A. Kiesler, and S. B. Kiesler, "Conformity", Addison-Wesley Reading, Mass, 1969.
  17. J. Pfeffer, "Organizations and Organization Theory", Pitman Boston. 1982.
  18. R. P. Bagozzi, "Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), p.607, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.607
  19. M. E. Pullman, and M. A. Gross, "Ability of Experience Design Elements to Elicit Emotions and Loyalty Behaviors", Decision Sciences, 35(3), pp.551-578, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-7315.2004.02611.x
  20. R. J. Lewicki, D. J. McAllister, and R. J. Bies, " Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities", Academy of Management Review, 23(3), pp.438-458, 1998. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926620
  21. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models", Management Science, 35(8), pp.982-1003, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  22. V. Venkatesh, "Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation', Mis Quarterly, pp.239-260, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2307/249753
  23. V. Venkatesh, and F. D. Davis, "A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test", Decision Sciences, 27(3), pp.451-481, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x