Industrial Engineering and Management Systems

  • 제15권1호
  • /
  • Pages.49-62
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1598-7248(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6473(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Using DEA and AHP for Hierarchical Structures of Data

  • 투고 : 2015.08.31
  • 심사 : 2016.03.15
  • 발행 : 2016.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper, we propose an integrated data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in which the information about the hierarchical structures of input-output data can be reflected in the performance assessment of decision making units (DMUs). Firstly, this can be implemented by extending a traditional DEA model to a three-level DEA model. Secondly, weight bounds, using AHP, can be incorporated in the three-level DEA model. Finally, the effects of incorporating weight bounds can be analyzed by developing a parametric distance model. Increasing the value of a parameter in a domain of efficiency loss, we explore the various systems of weights. This may lead to various ranking positions for each DMU in comparison to the other DMUs. An illustrative example of road safety performance for a set of 19 European countries highlights the usefulness of the proposed approach.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S. F., and Izadbakhsh, H. (2008), Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195(2), 775-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.05.023
  2. Cai, Y. and Wu, W. (2001), Synthetic financial evaluation by a method of combining DEA with AHP, International Transactions in Operational Research, 8(5), 603-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-3995.00336
  3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  4. Chen, T. Y. (2002), Measuring firm performance with DEA and prior information in Taiwan's banks, Applied Economics Letters, 9(3), 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850110057947
  5. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., and Zhu, J. (2004), Handbook on data envelopment analysis, Norwel, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  6. Entani, T., Ichihashi, H., and Tanaka, H. (2004), Evaluation method based on interval AHP and DEA, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 12(1), 25-34.
  7. Ertay, T., Ruan, D., and Tuzkaya, U. R. (2006), Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems, Information Sciences, 176(3), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.12.001
  8. Feng, Y., Lu, H., and Bi, K. (2004), An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities, International Transactions in Operational Research, 11(2), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2004.00450.x
  9. Ho, C. B. and Oh, K. B. (2010), Selecting internet company stocks using a combined DEA and AHP approach, International Journal of Systems Science, 41(3), 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720903326902
  10. Jablonsky, J. (2007), Measuring the efficiency of production units by AHP models, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7), 1091-1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.007
  11. Jyoti, T., Banwet, D. K., and Deshmukh, S. G. (2008), Evaluating performance of national R&D organizations using integrated DEA-AHP technique, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(5), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400810881836
  12. Kao, C. and Hung, H. (2005), Data envelopment analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approach, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(10), 1196-1203. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601924
  13. Kim, T. (2000), Extended topics in the integration of data envelopment analysis and the analytic hierarchy process in decision making, Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural and Mechanical College, Louisiana State University, United States of America.
  14. Kong, W. and Fu, T. (2012), Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators, Omega, 40(5), 541-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.10.004
  15. Korpela, J., Lehmusvaara, A., and Nisonen, J. (2007), Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies, International Journal of Production Economics, 108(1/2), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.046
  16. Lee, A. H. I., Lin, C. Y., Kang, H. Y., and Lee, W. H. (2012), An Integrated Performance Evaluation Model for the Photovoltaics Industry, Energies, 5(4), 1271-1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5041271
  17. Lin, M., Lee, Y., and Ho, T. (2011), Applying integrated DEA/AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in china, European Journal of Operational Research, 209(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.08.006
  18. Liu, C. and Chen, C. (2004), Incorporating value judgments into data envelopment analysis to improve decision quality for organization, Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 5(1/2), 423-427.
  19. Liu, C. M., Hsu, H. S., Wang, S. T., and Lee, H. K. (2005), A Performance Evaluation Model Based on AHP and DEA, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 22(3), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10170660509509294
  20. Lozano, S. and Villa, G. (2009), Multiobjective target setting in data envelopment analysis using AHP, Computers and Operations Research, 36(2), 549-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2007.10.015
  21. Meng, W., Zhang, D., Qi, L., and Liu, W. (2008), Twolevel DEA approaches in research evaluation, Omega, 36(6), 950-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2007.12.005
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008), Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, OECD: OECD Publishing.
  23. Pakkar, M. S. (2016), A hierarchical aggregation approach for indicators based on data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy process, Systems, 4(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems4010006
  24. Pakkar, M. S. (2015), An integrated approach based on DEA and AHP, Computational Management Science, 12(1), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-014-0207-9
  25. Pakkar, M. S. (2014a), Using DEA and AHP for ratio analysis, American Journal of Operations Research, 4(1), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2014.44026
  26. Pakkar, M. S. (2014b), Using the AHP and DEA methodologies for stock selection, In V. Charles and M. Kumar (Eds.), Business Performance Measurement and Management, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 566-580.
  27. Podinovski, V. V. (2004), Suitability and redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, Amsterdam, 154(2), 380-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00176-0
  28. Premachandra, I. M. (2001), Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis by Incorporating decision maker's value judgement: An approach based on AHP, Journal of Information and Management Science, 12(2), 1-12.
  29. Ramanathan, R. (2007), Supplier selection problem:Integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP, Supply Chain Management, 12(4), 258-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540710759772
  30. Raut, R. D. (2011), Environmental performance: A hybrid method for supplier selection using AHP-DEA, International Journal of Business Insights and Transformation, 5(1), 16-29.
  31. Saaty, T. S. (1980), The analytic hierarchy process, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  32. Saen, R. F., Memariani, A., and Lotfi, F. H. (2005), Determining relative efficiency of slightly non-homogeneous decision making units by data envelopment analysis: A case study in IROST, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 165(2), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.04.050
  33. Shang, J. and Sueyoshi, T. (1995), Theory and Methodology-A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System, European Journal of Operational Research, 85(2), 297- 315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00041-A
  34. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., and Hadada, Y. (2000), An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units, International Transactions in Operational Research, 7(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00189.x
  35. Shen, Y., Hermans, E., Brijs, T., Wets, G., and Vanhoof, K. (2012), Road safety risk evaluation and target setting using data envelopment analysis and its extensions, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.02.020
  36. Shen, Y., Hermans, E., Ruan, D., Wets, G., Brijs, T., and Vanhoof, K. (2011), A generalized multiple layer data envelopment analysis model for hierarchical structure assessment: A case study in road safety performance evaluation, Expert systems with applications, 38(12), 15262-15272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.073
  37. Takamura, Y. and Tone, K. (2003), A comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00049-6
  38. Tseng, W., Yang, C., and Wang, D. (2009), Using the DEA and AHP methods on the optimal selection of IT strategic alliance partner, Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Business and Information (BAI), 6(1), 1-15, Kuala Lumpur, Academy of Taiwan Information Systems Research (ATISR).
  39. Yang, T. and Kuo, C. (2003), A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00251-5

피인용 문헌

  1. An integrated approach to grey relational analysis, analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1108/JCC-08-2016-0005
  2. Enhancing the effectiveness of AHP for environmental performance assessment of Thailand and Taiwan’s food industry vol.190, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7113-5
  3. A Bi-Objective Stochastic Closed-loop Supply Chain Network Design Problem Considering Downside Risk vol.16, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2017.16.3.342
  4. Renewable energy performance evaluation studies using the data envelopment analysis (DEA): A systematic review vol.12, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0024750
  5. Selection of Production Mix in the Agricultural Machinery Industry Considering Sustainability in Decision Making vol.13, pp.16, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169110