DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

남성복의 감성 및 선호 스타일과 실제 착용간의 차이

Differences Between Wearing Styles and Preferring Styles and the Sensibility According to Men's Fashion Style

  • Rim, Byungmook (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Janghyung (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Jisu (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University) ;
  • Na, Youngjoo (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2016.04.20
  • 심사 : 2016.08.08
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31

초록

시대가 급속히 변화함에 따라 남성의 라이프 스타일, 개성, 가치관 등이 다양하며 과거에 비해 남성복에 대한 기호도 변하였을 뿐만 아니라 또 남성복 시장이 증대되었고 전에 없던 새로운 스타일이 많이 등장하였으나 활발한 여성복 감성 연구와 달리 남성복의 스타일에 따른 감성 연구는 미비한 실정이다. 이에 20대 남성들이 주로 착용하는 스타일을 7가지 대표 자극물로 선정하고 자극물로 제시하여 각 스타일에 대한 소비자의 감성을 조사하였다. 스타일 1 (정장), 스타일 2 (라이더재킷+스키니 팬츠), 스타일 3 (블루종+스트레이트 팬츠), 스타일 4 (박시한 가디건+하프 팬츠), 스타일 5 (야전상의+스트레이트 팬츠), 스타일 6 (루즈핏 재킷+스키니 팬츠), 스타일 7 (야구점퍼+스트레이트 팬츠) 등 남성복 스타일에 따른 감성의 차이를 조사하였으며 성별에 따른 남성복에 대한 관심과 지식정도 차이를 비교하였고 남성복의 선호와 실제착용 간에 차이가 있는지 분석하였고 라이프 스타일 유형에 따른 선호하는 스타일을 측정하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 남성복은 다양하고 세분화되었고 남성복에 대한 관심과 지식은 남성이 여성보다 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 남성복에 대한 감성은 스타일에 따라 유의한 차이가 있었지만 이는 성별에 따라 다르지 않았다. 셋째, 20대가 가장 선호하는 선호스타일과 실제로 즐겨 입는 착장스타일 간에는 차이가 존재하였는데, 일치하는 비율은 66.1% 이었고, 불일치하는 경우는 33.9% 이였다. 선호도와 실제 착용도가 가장 높은 것은 스타일 3 이었으며, 가장 선호되지 않고 착용되지 않는 것은 스타일 5 이었다. 넷째, 내향적보다 외향적 라이프 스타일을 지닐수록 더 다양한 스타일에 대하여 선호도를 나타내었다.

As times change rapidly the lifestyle, personality, and values of men have changed diversely. Not only have preferences for men's clothing changed, men's fashion market has also grown, and novel, non-preexisting styles have come into place. Also, there are many studies on sensibility of women's fashion while studies on sensibility of men's fashion are insufficient. This study categorized common styles for men in their 20s into 7 different representative samples and investigated consumers' sensibility evaluations for each representative sample. Style 1 (suit), style 2 (rider jacket + skinny pants), style 3 (blouson + straight pants), style 4 (cardigan + half pants), style 5 (military jacket + straight pants), style 6 (loose fit jacket + skinny pants), and style 7 (baseball jumper + straight pants) were prepared in the evaluation questionnaire. The study compared male and female interest and knowledge of men's fashion, evaluated the sensibility difference depending on the men's fashion, analyzed whether there is a difference between preferred men's clothing and actual wearing of the clothing, and examined the preferred style in relation with the lifestyle. The results are as follows: First, men's fashion was diversified and subdivided, and interest and knowledge about men's fashion was greater for males than females. Second, sensibility of men's fashion had significant differences depending on the style, and it did not depend on genders. Third, there was a clear difference between the most favored style by the 20s and the actual style they commonly wear; the favored style and the actual worn style were consistent 66.1% of all the cases, inconsistent 33.9% of those. Style 3 had the highest preference and the actual wearing rate, and style 5 was the least preferred and worn. Fourth, the more extroverted lifestyle rather than introverted one, the more it was likely to prefer diverse styles.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, S. K., Jung, S. J., & Sung, N. S. (2009). A study on sensibility image of necktie according to width and color combination of checked pattern. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 12(4), 545-556.
  2. Jeon, M. J., Oh, H. S., & Kim, J. Y. (2012). A study on the outdoor wear evaluation criteria and purchase practices according to fashion lifestyle. The Treatise on The Plastic Media, 15(3), 201-208.
  3. Jung, K. Y., & Na, Y. J. (2005). Effects of design detail types of ladies wear on sensibility and emotion. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 7(2), 162-168.
  4. Kim, C, S. & Park, M, R. (2014). A study on the appearance care behaviors, clothing selection behaviors and clothing design preference of 20-30's Korean men by the level of grooming. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 16(2), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2014.16.2.245
  5. Kim, H, J. & Kim, T. G. (2010). A study on cross sexual styles in contemporary men's wear collections. The Korean Society of Fashion Design, 10(4), 19-33.
  6. Kim, Y. J. & Lee, K, H. (2003). A study of the relationship between fashion sensibility and emotion (Part II). Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(3), 418-418.
  7. Kim, Y. W. & Choi, J. M. (2010). Color sensibility and preferring of the black color fabrics. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 13(2), 337-346.
  8. Kwon, K. D., Kim, S. H., & Lee, S. J. (2002). An exploratory study on relations between fashion life style & consumer behavior at decline stage of the fashion life cycle. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 26(2), 280-291.
  9. Lee, S. H. & Lee, K. H. (2009). A study of fashion sensibility and consumer sensibility of men's casual brand's patterned woven shirts. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(3), 444-456. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.3.444
  10. Lee, S. Y. & Park, S. J. (2015). An analysis on the 'Normcore' trend and the visual expression in magazine design. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 21(3), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.20406/kjcs.2015.08.21.3.511
  11. Lee, K. H. & Kim, Y. J. (2002). Process of the scale in fashion sensibility. Science of Emotion & sensibility, 4(1), 33-42.
  12. Mun, K. H. (2010). A study on lifestyle of Korean women for emotional design development of product. Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 11(1), 119-127.
  13. Na, Y. J. & Kwon, O. K. (2000). Characteristics of domestic textile designs and trend sensibility for women's apparel. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 2(3), 198-204.
  14. Na, Y. J. (2011). Appearance frequency of eco-friendly emotion and sensibility words and their changes. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 14(2), 207-220.
  15. Oh, H. S. (2002). A study of consumer evaluations and preferring for men's fashion style image. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 4(1), 47-55.
  16. Park, K. J. & Na, Y. J. (2014). Sensibility according to blouse type and their best-fit color tone. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 17(2), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2014.17.2.123
  17. Park, Y. H. (2004). The sensibility image and preferring degree of pattern which appeared on men's clothing. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 54(4), 113-127.
  18. Sung, N. S. (2008). The effect on image perception of male wearer with chromatic-achromatic colors and area-radio of stripe necktie. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 11(3), 325-338.