Molecules and Cells

Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology (한국분자세포생물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DNA Strand Breaks in Mitotic Germ Cells of Caenorhabditis elegans Evaluated by Comet Assay

  • Park, Sojin (Department of Life Sciences, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Choi, Seoyun (Department of Life Sciences, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Ahn, Byungchan (Department of Life Sciences, University of Ulsan)
  • Received : 2015.07.22
  • Accepted : 2015.11.23
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

DNA damage responses are important for the maintenance of genome stability and the survival of organisms. Such responses are activated in the presence of DNA damage and lead to cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair. In Caenorhabditis elegans, double-strand breaks induced by DNA damaging agents have been detected indirectly by antibodies against DSB recognizing proteins. In this study we used a comet assay to detect DNA strand breaks and to measure the elimination of DNA strand breaks in mitotic germline nuclei of C. elegans. We found that C. elegans brc-1 mutants were more sensitive to ionizing radiation and camptothecin than the N2 wild-type strain and repaired DNA strand breaks less efficiently than N2. This study is the first demonstration of direct measurement of DNA strand breaks in mitotic germline nuclei of C. elegans. This newly developed assay can be applied to detect DNA strand breaks in different C. elegans mutants that are sensitive to DNA damaging agents.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamo, A., Montemauri, P., Silva, N., Ward, J.D., Boulton, S.J., and La, V.A. (2008). BRC-1 acts in the inter-sister pathway of meiotic double-strand break repair. EMBO Rep. 9, 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401167
  2. Ahmed, S., and Hodgkin, J. (2000). MRT-2 checkpoint protein is required for germline immortality and telomere replication in C. elegans. Nature 403, 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1038/35003120
  3. Alpi, A., Pasierbek, P., Gartner, A., and Loidl, J. (2003). Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 112, 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-003-0237-5
  4. Balajee, A.S., and Geard, C.R. (2004). Replication protein A and gamma-H2AX foci assembly is triggered by cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. Exp. Cell Res. 300, 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.07.022
  5. Bekker-Jensen, S., Lukas, C., Kitagawa, R., Melander, F., Kastan, M.B., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2006). Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 173, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200510130
  6. Boulton, S.J., Martin, J.S., Polanowska, J., Hill, D.E., Gartner, A., and Vidal, M. (2004). BRCA1/BARD1 orthologs required for DNA repair in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 14, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.029
  7. Broude, N.E., and Budowsky, E.I. (1973). The reaction of glyoxal with nucleic acid components. V. Denaturation of DNA under the action of glyoxal. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 294, 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2787(73)90092-0
  8. Chen, B.Y., Huang, C.H., Lin, Y.H., Huang, C.C., Deng, C.X., and Hsu, L.C. (2014). The K898E germline variant in the PP1-binding motif of BRCA1 causes defects in DNA Repair. Sci. Rep. 4, 5812.
  9. Chin, G.M., and Villeneuve, A.M. (2001). C. elegans mre-11 is required for meiotic recombination and DNA repair but is dispensable for the meiotic G(2) DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 15, 522-534. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.864101
  10. Craig, A.L., Moser, S.C., Bailly, A.P., and Gartner, A. (2012). Methods for studying the DNA damage response in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Methods Cell Biol. 107, 321-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394620-1.00011-4
  11. Essers, J., Houtsmuller, A.B., van, V.L., Paulusma, C., Nigg, A.L., Pastink, A., Vermeulen, W., Hoeijmakers, J.H., and Kanaar, R. (2002). Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 21, 2030-2037. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.8.2030
  12. Garcia-Muse, T., and Boulton, S.J. (2005). Distinct modes of ATR activation after replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J. 24, 4345-4355. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600896
  13. Godard, T., Deslandes, E., Sichel, F., Poul, J.M., and Gauduchon, P. (2002). Detection of topoisomerase inhibitor-induced DNA strand breaks and apoptosis by the alkaline comet assay. Mutat. Res. 520, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00174-2
  14. Hofmann, E.R., Milstein, S., Boulton, S.J., Ye, M., Hofmann, J.J., Stergiou, L., Gartner, A., Vidal, M., and Hengartner, M.O. (2002). Caenorhabditis elegans HUS-1 is a DNA damage checkpoint protein required for genome stability and EGL-1-mediated apoptosis. Curr. Biol. 12, 1908-1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01262-9
  15. Hyun, M., Lee, J., Lee, K., May, A., Bohr, V.A., and Ahn, B. (2008). Longevity and resistance to stress correlate with DNA repair capacity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 1380-1389. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1161
  16. Hyun, M., Park, S., Kim, E., Kim, D.H., Lee, S.J., Koo, H.S., Seo, Y.S., and Ahn, B. (2012). Physical and functional interactions of Caenorhabditis elegans WRN-1 helicase with RPA-1. Biochemistry 51, 1336-1345. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi200791p
  17. Kalogeropoulos, N., Christoforou, C., Green, A.J., Gill, S., and Ashcroft, N.R. (2004). chk-1 is an essential gene and is required for an S-M checkpoint during early embryogenesis. Cell Cycle 3, 1196-1200.
  18. Langerak, P., and Russell, P. (2011). Regulatory networks integrating cell cycle control with DNA damage checkpoints and double-strand break repair. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 366, 3562-3571. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0070
  19. Lankinen, M.H., Vilpo, L.M., and Vilpo, J.A. (1996). UV- and gamma-irradiation-induced DNA single-strand breaks and their repair in human blood granulocytes and lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 352, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(95)00172-7
  20. Lee, S.J., Gartner, A., Hyun, M., Ahn, B., and Koo, H.S. (2010). The Caenorhabditis elegans Werner syndrome protein functions upstream of ATR and ATM in response to DNA replication inhibition and double-strand DNA breaks. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000801
  21. Lemmens, B.B., and Tijsterman, M. (2011). DNA double-strand break repair in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 120, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-010-0296-3
  22. MacQueen, A.J., and Villeneuve, A.M. (2001). Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. Genes Dev. 15, 1674-1687. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.902601
  23. Meza, J.E., Brzovic, P.S., King, M.C., and Klevit, R.E. (1999). Mapping the functional domains of BRCA1. Interaction of the ring finger domains of BRCA1 and BARD1. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5659-5665. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.9.5659
  24. Miyazaki, T., Bressan, D.A., Shinohara, M., Haber, J.E., and Shinohara, A. (2004). In vivo assembly and disassembly of Rad51 and Rad52 complexes during double-strand break repair. EMBO J. 23, 939-949. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600091
  25. Moynahan, M.E., Chiu, J.W., Koller, B.H., and Jasin, M. (1999). Brca1 controls homology-directed DNA repair. Mol. Cell 4, 511-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80202-6
  26. Nakada, S., Yonamine, R.M., and Matsuo, K. (2012). RNF8 regulates assembly of RAD51 at DNA double-strand breaks in the absence of BRCA1 and 53BP1. Cancer Res. 72, 4974-4983. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1057
  27. Olive, P.L. (2011). Retention of gammaH2AX foci as an indication of lethal DNA damage. Radiother. Oncol. 101, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.055
  28. Olive, P.L., and Banath, J.P. (2006). The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells. Nat. Protoc. 1, 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.5
  29. Olive, P.L., Banath, J.P., and Durand, R.E. (1990). Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the "comet" assay. Radiat. Res. 122, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3577587
  30. Pachkowski, B., and Nakamura, J. (2013). A neutral glyoxal gel electrophoresis method for the detection and semi-quantitation of DNA single-strand breaks. Methods Mol. Biol. 1054, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-565-1_8
  31. Paull, T.T., Rogakou, E.P., Yamazaki, V., Kirchgessner, C.U., Gellert, M., and Bonner, W.M. (2000). A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10, 886-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00610-2
  32. Petalcorin, M.I., Galkin, V.E., Yu, X., Egelman, E.H., and Boulton, S.J. (2007). Stabilization of RAD-51-DNA filaments via an interaction domain in Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8299-8304. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702805104
  33. Polanowska, J., Martin, J.S., Garcia-Muse, T., Petalcorin, M.I., and Boulton, S.J. (2006). A conserved pathway to activate BRCA1- dependent ubiquitylation at DNA damage sites. EMBO J. 25, 2178-2188. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601102
  34. Pommier, Y. (2006). Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 789-802. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1977
  35. Powell, S.N., and Kachnic, L.A. (2003). Roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in homologous recombination, DNA replication fidelity and the cellular response to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 22, 5784-5791. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206678
  36. Ryan, A.J., Squires, S., Strutt, H.L., and Johnson, R.T. (1991). Camptothecin cytotoxicity in mammalian cells is associated with the induction of persistent double strand breaks in replicating DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 3295-3300. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/19.12.3295
  37. Scully, R., Ganesan, S., Vlasakova, K., Chen, J., Socolovsky, M., and Livingston, D.M. (1999). Genetic analysis of BRCA1 function in a defined tumor cell line. Mol. Cell 4, 1093-1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80238-5
  38. Singh, N.P., and Khan, A. (1995). Acetaldehyde: genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 337, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8777(95)00006-6
  39. Sobkowiak, R., and Lesicki, A. (2009). Genotoxicity of nicotine in cell culture of Caenorhabditis elegans evaluated by the comet assay. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 32, 252-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/01480540902882184
  40. Tarsounas, M., Davies, A.A., and West, S.C. (2004). RAD51 localization and activation following DNA damage. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 359, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1368
  41. van Veelen, L.R., Cervelli, T., van de Rakt, M.W., Theil, A.F., Essers, J., and Kanaar, R. (2005). Analysis of ionizing radiation-induced foci of DNA damage repair proteins. Mutat. Res. 574, 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.019
  42. Wicky, C., Alpi, A., Passannante, M., Rose, A., Gartner, A., and Muller, F. (2004). Multiple genetic pathways involving the Caenorhabditis elegans Bloom's syndrome genes him-6, rad-51, and top-3 are needed to maintain genome stability in the germ line. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 5016-5027. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.11.5016-5027.2004

Cited by

  1. Assessment of alterations in X-ray irradiation-induced DNA damage of glioma cells by using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy vol.84, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2017.01.010
  2. Caenorhabditis elegans as a powerful alternative model organism to promote research in genetic toxicology and biomedicine vol.91, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-1944-7
  3. The application of the comet assay to assess the genotoxicity of environmental pollutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans vol.45, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2016.06.020
  4. Comet assay: an essential tool in toxicological research vol.90, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1767-y
  5. Measuring the lactate-to-creatine ratio via 1H NMR spectroscopy can be used to noninvasively evaluate apoptosis in glioma cells after X-ray irradiation vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-018-0092-2
  6. vol.293, pp.13, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.805879
  7. 6-Gingerol prevents MEHP-induced DNA damage in human umbilical vein endothelia cells vol.36, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327116681650
  8. Analysis of representative mutants for key DNA repair pathways on healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans vol.200, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2021.111573