Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A mathematical steel panel zone model for flanged cruciform columns

  • Saffari, Hamed (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman) ;
  • Sarfarazi, Sina (Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology) ;
  • Fakhraddini, Ali (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman)
  • Received : 2015.08.09
  • Accepted : 2015.12.16
  • Published : 2016.03.20
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Cruciform sections are an appropriate option for columns of orthogonal moment resisting frames for equal bending strength and stiffness about two main axes and the implementation is easier for continuity plates. These columns consist of two I-shaped sections, so that one of them is cut out in middle and two generated T-shaped sections be welded into I-shaped profile. Furthermore, in steel moment frames, unbalance moment at the beam-column connection leads to shear deformation in panel zone. Most of the obtained relations for panel zone strength derived from experimental and analytical results are on I-shaped columns with almost thin flanges. In this paper, a parametric study has been carried out using Finite Element Method (FEM) with effective parameters at the panel zone behavior. These parameters consist of column flange thickness, column web thickness, and thickness of continuity plates. Additionally, a mathematical model has been suggested to determine strength of cruciform column panel zone and has been shown its accuracy and efficiency.

Keywords

References

  1. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. Becker, R. (1975), "Panel zone effect on the strength and stiffness of steel rigid frames", Eng. J., AISC, 12(1), 19-29.
  3. Bertero, V.V., Krawinkler, H. and Popov, E.P. (1973), "Further studies on seismic behavior of steel beamto-column subassemblages", EERC Rep. No. 73-27; University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  4. Brandonisio, G., De Luca, A. and Mele, E. (2012), "Shear strength of panel zone in beam-to-column connections", J. Construct. Steel Res., 71, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.11.004
  5. El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T., Vidarsson, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (1998), "Strength and ductility of FR weldedbolted connections", Report No. SAC/BD-98/01; SAC Joint Venture.
  6. Fielding, D.J. and Huang, J.S. (1971), "Shear in steel beam-to-column connections", Welding Journal, 50(3), 313-326.
  7. Hedayat, A.A., Saffari, H. and Mousavi, M. (2013), "Behavior of steel reduced beam web (RBW) connections with arch-shape cut", J. Adv. Struct. Eng., 16(10) 1644-1662.
  8. Jin, J. and El-Tawil, S. (2005), "Evaluation of FEMA-350 seismic provisions for steel panel zones", J. Struct. Eng.,ASCE, 131(2), 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:2(250)
  9. Kim, K.D. and Engelhardt, M.D. (2002), "Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames", J. Construct. Steel Res., 58(5-8), 605-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00079-7
  10. Krawinkler, H. and Mohasseb, S. (1987), "Effects of panel zone deformations on seismic response", J. Construct. Steel Res., 8, 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(87)90060-5
  11. Krawinkler, H., Bertero, V.V. and Popov, E.P. (1971), "Inelastic behavior of steel beam-to-column subassemblages", EERC Rep. No. 71-7; University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  12. Lee, K.H., Stojadinovic, B., Goel, S.C., Margarin, A.G., Choi, J., Wongkaew, A., Reyher, B.P. and Lee, D.Y. (2000), "Parametric tests on unreinforced connections", SAC Background Document, SAC/BD-00/01; SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, CA, USA.
  13. Mansouri, I. and Saffari, H. (2014), "A new steel panel zone model including axial force for thin to thick column flanges", Steel Compos. Struct., Int J., 16(4), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.4.417
  14. Nasrabadi, M.M., Torabian, S. and Mirghaderi, S.R. (2013), "Panel zone modelling of flanged cruciform columns: An analytical and numerical approach", Eng. Struct., 49, 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.029
  15. Popov, E.P. (1987), "Panel zone flexibility in seismic moment joints", J. Construct. Steel Res., 8, 91-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(87)90055-1
  16. Popov, E.P. and Takhirov, S. (2001), "Experimental study of large seismic steel beam-to-column connections", PEER-2001/01; Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  17. Ricles, J.M., Zhang, X., Lu, L.W. and Fisher, J.W. (2004), "Development of seismic guidelines for deepcolumn steel moment connections", ATLSS Report No. 04-13.
  18. Saffari, H., Hedayat, A.A and Nejad, M.P. (2013a), "Post-Northridge connections with slit dampers to enhance strength and ductility", J. Construct. Steel Res., 80, 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.023
  19. Saffari, H., Hedayat, A.A. and Goharizi, N.S. (2013b), "Suggesting double-web I-shape columns for omitting continuity plates in a box column", Steel Compos. Struct., Int J., 15(6), 585-603. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.15.6.585
  20. Saffari, H., Hedayat, A.A. and Goharrizi, N.S. (2015), "New alternatives for continuity plates in I-beam to box columns connections", Asian J. Civil Eng. (BHRC), 16(2), 219-233.
  21. SIMULIA. ABAQUS (2013), Analysis and theory manuals, SIMULIA, The Dassault Systemes, Realistic Simulation, Providence, RI, USA.
  22. Wang, S.J. (1988), "Seismic response of steel building frames with inelastic joint deformation", Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

Cited by

  1. Local Flange Bending and Continuity Plate Requirements in Double-Web H-Shaped Columns vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0316-3
  2. A simple panel zone model for linear analysis of steel moment frames vol.35, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.4.579
  3. A Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Panel Zones on Cyclic Lateral Capacity of Steel Moment Frames vol.44, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00274-y
  4. Comparing the performance of substructure and direct methods to estimate the effect of SSI on seismic response of mid-rise structures vol.15, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1597560