DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A parametric study on seismic fragility analysis of RC buildings

  • Nagashree, B.K. (Department of Civil Engineering, Visvesvaraya Technological University B.D.T College of Engineering) ;
  • Ravi, Kumar C.M. (Department of Civil Engineering, Visvesvaraya Technological University B.D.T College of Engineering) ;
  • Venkat, Reddy D. (Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka)
  • Received : 2015.09.30
  • Accepted : 2015.12.11
  • Published : 2016.03.25

Abstract

Among all the natural disasters, earthquakes are the most destructive calamities since they cause a plenty of injuries and economic losses leaving behind a series of signs of panic. The present study highlights the moment-curvature relationships for the structural elements such as beam and column elements and Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis of RC frame structures since it is a very simplified procedure of non-linear static analysis. The highly popular model namely Mander's model and Kent and Park model are considered and then, seismic risk evaluation of RC building has been conducted using SAP 2000 version 17 treating uncertainty in strength as a parameter. From the obtained capacity and demand curves, the performance level of the structure has been defined. The seismic fragility curves were developed for the variations in the material strength and damage state threshold are calculated. Also the comparison of experimental and analytical results has been conducted.

Keywords

References

  1. Agrawal, P. and Shrikhande, M. (2006), Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, (4th Edition), PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
  2. Bakhshi, A. and Ansari, M. (2014), "Development of seismic fragility curves for reinforced concrete tall buildings", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014Porto, Portugal, ISSN: 2311-9020, ISBN: 978-972-752-165-4, 2939-2946.
  3. Barbat, A.H., Pujades, L.G. and Lantada, N. (2008), "Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: application to Barcelona", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 28(10), 851-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.006
  4. Duggal, S.K. (2007), Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, (2nd Edition), Oxford University, New Delhi, India.
  5. IS 1893(Part 1) (2002), Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structure, (5th Revision), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  6. Khoshnoud, H.R. and Marsono, K. (2012), "Assessment of FEMA 356 nonlinear static procedure and modal pushover analysis for seismic evaluation of buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 41(2), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.2.243
  7. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. (1998), "Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation", Eng. Struct., 20(4), 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8
  8. Kumar, B.N., Gornale, A. and Mubashir, A. (2012), "Seismic performance evaluation of R c-Framed buildings-An approach to torsionally asymmetric buildings", IOSR J. Eng., 2(7), 1-12.
  9. Lee, Y.-J. and Moon, D.-S. (2014), "A new methodology of the development of seismic fragility curves", Smart Struct. Syst., 14(5), 847-867. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.14.5.847
  10. Lu, D.G., Yu, X.H. and Jia, M.M. (2012), "Analytical formulations of fragility functions with applications to probabilistic seismic risk analysis", Proceedings of the 15th World conference on Earthquake Engineering, Harbin, China.
  11. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  12. Mehani, Y., Bechtoula, H., Kibboua, A. and Naili, M. (2013), "Assessment of seismic fragility curves for existing RC buildings in Algiers after the 2003 Boumerdes earthquake", Struct. Eng. Mech., 46(6), 791-808. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.46.6.791
  13. Nasserasadi, K., Ghafory-Ashtiany, M., Eshghi, S. and Zolfaghari, M.R. (2009), "Developing seismic fragility function of structures by stochastic approach", Asian J. Civ. Eng. (building and housing), 10(2), 183-200.
  14. Pragalath D.C., H., Davis P., R., Sarkar, P. and Priyadharshini, M. (2014), "Seismic Reliability Assessment of RC Frame in a High Seismic Zone of India", International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering and Chemistry of Innovative Materials, Chennai, India
  15. Ravi Kumar, C.M., Babu Narayan, K.S. and Venkat Reddy, D. (2014), "Probabilistic seismic risk evaluation of RC buildings", Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., 3(1), 484-495.
  16. Reddiar, M.K.M. (2009), "Stress-strain model of unconfined and confined concrete and stress-block parameters", Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
  17. Robin Exercise For Analysis And Experiment On Full-scale Four-storied RCC Structure Under Monotonically Increasing Lateral (Pushover) Loads, Reactor Safety Division, BARC, Trombay, Mumbai and CPRI, New BEL Road, Bangalore.
  18. Rohit, Bansal (2011), "Pushover Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame", M.Tech thesis, Thappar University, Punjab, India.
  19. Unnithan, U.V., Prasad, A.M. and Rao, B.N. (2008), "Development of fragility curves using high dimensional model representation", 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
  20. Vargas, Y.F., Barbat, A.H., Pujades, L.G. and Hurtado, J.E. (2013), "Probabilistic seismic risk evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings. structures and buildings", Proceedings of the institution of civil engineering.
  21. Vona, M. (2014), "Fragility curves of existing RC buildings based on specific structural performance levels", Open J. Civ. Eng., 4, 120-134. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2014.42011

Cited by

  1. Implications of bi-directional interaction on seismic fragilities of structures vol.5, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2016.5.2.101
  2. The effect of structural variability and local site conditions on building fragility functions vol.14, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.4.285
  3. Seismic fragility analysis of RC frame-core wall buildings under the combined vertical and horizontal ground motions vol.20, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.2.175
  4. SSI effects on the redistribution of seismic forces in one-storey R/C buildings vol.20, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.3.261