DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Next-generation Archival Description Standard: "Record in Context" of ICA EGAD

차세대 기록물 기술표준에 관한 연구 - ICA EGAD의 Record In Context를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2016.01.27
  • Accepted : 2016.02.23
  • Published : 2016.02.29

Abstract

Previously, the International Council of Archives (ICA) provided the General International Standard Archival Description (ISAD(G)) and the International Standard Archival Authority Record for Corporate Bodies, Persons and Families (ISAAR(CPF)) for the systematic archival description by the Committee on Best Practice and Standards. Recently, the new conceptual model and ontology, which is called "Record in Context" (RIC), is being developed by the ICA Experts Group on Archival Description (EGAD). For developing the new archival standard, ICA EGAD has referenced the archival standards of Australia, Spain, and Finland, as well as the FRBRoo integrated model of the museum and library fields and the legacy ICA's descriptive standards. This study, therefore, examined these international trends on the archival descriptive standards and derived a number of suggestions for improvement. As a result, descriptive standards are changing from the guidelines for the standardized archival description to the upper conceptual model and ontology for the flexible archival description and sharing of archival metadata. There is a need to adapt the change of the information environment and promote cooperation among cultural heritage institutions.

ICA의 CBPS에서는 지난 20여년간 ISAD(G)와 ISAAR(CPF)와 같은 기록물 기술표준을 개발해 왔다. 그리고 최근에 ICA는 새로운 조직인 EGAD를 구성하여 기존의 기록물 기술표준을 통합하고 있다. EGAD가 개발 중인 기술표준의 명칭은 'Record in Context'(RIC)이며, 개념모형과 온톨로지로 구성된다. 그런데 EGAD는 RIC의 개발을 위해 ICA의 기존 기록물 기술표준뿐 아니라, 호주나 스페인, 핀란드에서 최근에 개정된 기록물 기술표준과 박물관 및 도서관 분야의 협력을 통해 개발된 FRBRoo도 참고하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국제적인 기록물 기술표준의 개정 동향을 살펴보고, 이와 같은 동향이 국내의 기록물 기술표준의 발전에 주는 시사점을 도출하였다. 기록물의 기술표준은 표준화된 기술요소의 정확한 입력지침을 넘어서, 상위의 개념틀을 제공하고, 이를 바탕으로 유연한 기록물 기술과 데이터 공유가 용이한 온톨로지를 제공하기 위해 개선되고 있었다. 앞으로는 국내의 기록물 기술표준도 정보환경의 변화를 수용하고, 문화유산관리기관 간의 협력을 증진시킬 수 있는 방향으로 발전해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가기록원 (2009). NAK/A 12:2009(v1.0) 국가기록원 전거레코드 지침. National Archives of Korea (2009). NAK/A 12:2009(v1.0) Guide for Authority Record of National Archives of Korea.
  2. 국가기록원 (2011). NAK/S 14:2011(v2.0) 영구기록물 기술규칙. National Archives of Korea (2011). NAK/S 14:2011(v2.0) Archival Description Rules.
  3. 국가기록원 (2012). NAK/S 8:2012(v2.0) 기록관리 메타데이터 표준. National Archives of Korea (2012). NAK/S 8:2012(v2.0) Records and Archives Management Metadata Standard.
  4. 기술표준원 (2007a). KS X ISO 15489-1 문헌정보-기록관리-제1부: 일반사항. Korea Agency for Technology and Standards (2007a). KS X ISO 15489-1 Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: General.
  5. 기술표준원 (2007b). KS X ISO TR 15489-2 문헌정보-기록관리-제2부: 지침. Korea Agency for Technology and Standards (2007b). KS X ISO TR 15489-2 Information and documentation-Records management - Part 2: Guidelines.
  6. 기술표준원 (2007c). KS X ISO 23081-1 문헌정보-기록관리과정-기록메타데이터-제1부: 원칙. Korea Agency for Technology and Standards (2007c). KS X ISO 23081-1 Information and documentation-Records management processes-Metadata for records-Part 1: Principles.
  7. 기술표준원 (2010). KS X ISO 23081-2 문헌정보-기록관리과정-기록메타데이터-제2부: 개념과 실행 고려사항. Korea Agency for Technology and Standards (2010). KS X ISO 23081-2 Information and documentation-Records management processes-Metadata for records-Part 2: Conceptual and implementation issues.
  8. 박지영 (2014). 문화유산기관 간의 전거데이터 공유에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아 발표논집, 65-82. Park, Ziyoung (2014). Sharing of Authority Data Among Cutural Heritage Institutions. Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science Conference Proceeding, 65-82.
  9. Bekiari, C. et al. (2015). FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping from FRBRER, FRAD and FRSAD (version 2.3). International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation.
  10. Clavaud, F. et al. (2015). ICA Expert Group on Archival Description: Interim Report on the Development of a Conceptual Model. 20th. Aug. 2015. Cleveland: SAA Annual Meeting.
  11. CNEDA (2012). Report on the work of CNEDA (2007-2012): toward a conceptual model for archival description in Spain.
  12. Doerr, M. & Le Boeuf, P. (2015). FRBRoo Introduction. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/frbr_inro.html
  13. Gueguen, G. et al. (2013). Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description: A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives' Experts Group on Archival Description. The American Archivist, 76(2), 566-583.
  14. ICA (1999). General International Standard Archival Description. 2nd edition.
  15. ICA (2004). International Standard Archival Authority Records-Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families. 2nd edition.
  16. ICA (2007). International Standard Description of Functions.
  17. ICA (2008). International Standard Description of Institutions with Archival Holdings.
  18. ICA (2014). ICA Annual Conference Archives and Cultural Industries. Web Sites. Retrieved Nov 2, 2015, from http://www.girona.cat/web/ica2014/eng/index.php
  19. ICA (2015). The Expert Group on Archival Description Web sites. Retrieved Nov 2, 2015, from http://www.ica.org/13851/egad-resources/egad-resources.html
  20. Le Boeuf (2012a). A Strange Model Named FRBROO, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 422-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.679222
  21. Le Boeuf (2012b). An example of library and museum cooperation: the FRBRoo conceptual model. CIDOC Annual Conference - 'Enriching Cultural Heritage' - Helsinki, 10-14 June 2012.
  22. Le Boeuf (2013). Transforming FRBR into FRBROO. Lecture delivered in Rome, Universita La Sapienza, on May 10, 2013 by Patrick Le Boeuf, National Library of France.
  23. McCarthy, G. & Pitti, D. (2014). Expert Group on Archival Description (EGAD) (Presentation in DCMI Pre-Conference Special Session. Retrieved October 8, 2014, from http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/index/pages/view/2014-archives
  24. National Archives of Australia (2011). Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Implementation Guidelines, version 2.0.
  25. National Archives of Australia (2015). Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Version 2.2.
  26. National Archives of Finland (2013). The Finnish Conceptual Model for Archival Description (draft). ver. 0.1.
  27. Pitti, D. et al. (2014). Experts Group on Archival Description: Interim Report. in Archives and Cultural Industries. (2nd Annual Conference of the International Council on Archives). Girona, 11th-15th Oct. 2014.
  28. SAA (2015). SAA Annual Meeting Archives 2015. Web sites. http://archivists.org/am2015