Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The City Ecological Soundness Index Development Based on the City Biodiversity Index (CBI) and Korean City Characteristics

우리나라 도시 특성을 고려한 도시생물다양성지수 적용성 검토 및 도시의 생태적 건전성 평가지표 개발

  • Received : 2016.10.10
  • Accepted : 2016.12.19
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD) encourages the use of the City Biodiversity Index (CBI) as a monitoring tool to assist local authorities in evaluating their progress in urban biodiversity conservation. The CBI has been applied to conserve the city biodiversity. This study has developed the City Ecological Soundness Index (CESI) based on the CBI and Korean city characteristics. The CESI includes total of 12 indicators grouped in three categories, which are 'biodiversity,' 'ecosystem services' and 'governance and management.' 85 cities in Korea were classified according to the city size and type. 18 cities have applicable biotope map, which were analyzed in the CESI pilot study. The CESI will contribute to collect and manage biodiversity data systematically and to promote biodiversity-related actions.

생물다양성협약 사무국(SCBD)은 도시생물다양성지수(CBI)를 지방자치단체에서 도시생물다양성을 평가할 수 있는 도구로 권장하고 있으며, 생물다양성 보전을 위해 해외 여러 도시에 시범적용하고 있다. 본 연구는 생태적 측면에서 도시의 객관적 평가를 위해 도시생물다양성지수를 중심으로 국내 도시 특성을 고려, 도시단위로 구축된 자료를 활용하여 현재의 자료구축 상황에 적합한 지표를 도출하고 시범 적용하였다. 도시의 생태적 건전성 평가지표(CESI)를 생물다양성, 생태계서비스, 행정 및 관리의 3개 영역 12개 지표로 구성하고, 그 계산방식을 제시하였다. 그리고 추후 모든 도시에 적용될 시 용이한 도시간 비교평가가 이루어 질 수 있도록 지목을 활용해 85개 도시의 유형을 분류하고, 도시생태현황지도의 활용이 용이한 18개 도시에 시범적으로 적용해 보았다. 도시의 생태적 건전성 평가지표는 생물다양성과 관련된 데이터를 체계적으로 수집 관리하고, 생물다양성을 증진하는 데 기여할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chan L, Hillel O, Elmqvist T, Werner P, Holman N, Mader A, Calcaterra E. 2014. User's manual on the Singapore Index on Cities' Biodiversity (also known as the City Biodiversity Index). National Parks Board, Singapore. 1-43.
  2. Global Footprint Network. 2015. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/methodology/. Global Footprint Network.
  3. Jaeger J, Nazarnia N. 2015. Methodology of Indicator 2 of the CBI. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 1-41.
  4. Kim BH, Jang SM, Lee SI. 2013. A Study on the influencing Factors on Transport Energy Consumption by City Types: On the Basis of City Types Classified by Travel Pattern and Urban Density. Journal of Korea Planners Association. 48(3): 129-148. [Korean Literature]
  5. Kohsaka R, Okumura S. 2014. Greening the Cities with Biodiversity Indicators: Experience and Challenges from Japanese Cities with CBI. Integrative Observations and Assessments. 409-424.
  6. KOSIS (KOrean Statistics Information Service). 2015. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=315&tblId=TX_315_2009_H1105&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=315_31502_015&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=E1#. Statistics Korea. [Korean Literature]
  7. Lee JH, LEE BG. 1989. Type Classification and Characteristics Compare of the Rural City. Journal of Rural Development. 12(4): 91-103. [Korean Literature]
  8. Lee WH, Ahn YJ. 2011. Regional Classification and Analysis for Promotion Area-specific Policy of Deprived Regions: A Case Study of the Growth Promotion Area Policy. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers. 17(1): 96-108. [Korean Literature]
  9. ME (Ministry of Environment). 2013a. Biotope mapping guidelines, Ministry of Environment, 1-40. [Korean Literature]
  10. ME (Ministry of Environment). 2013b. Natural Environment Conservation Act. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Article 43. [Korean Literature]
  11. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2007-2013. Monitoring of Invasive Alien Species Designated by the Wildlife Protection Act (I-VII). National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  12. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2014. A Study on Development and Application of Korean Environmental Sustainable City Index (ESCI) for Urban Environmental Management in Korea (I), National Institute of Environmental Research, 1-47. [Korean Literature]
  13. Liu XG, Zhang YM. 2008. An Empirical Analysis of Ecological City Evaluation Index System. Proceedings of 2008 Conference on Regional Economy and Sustainable Development. 111-116.
  14. Projectzero. 2015. http://www.projectzero.dk/da-DK/TopPages/Om-ProjectZero.aspx. Projectzero.
  15. SCBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Tenth Meeting. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 188-195.
  16. SCBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2012. User's Manual for the City Biodiversity Index. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 1-25.
  17. Seong JI, Song MR. 2003. Area Type Classification and Characteristics of Types of Rural Areas. Journal of Korea Planners Association. 26(2): 1-22. [Korean Literature]
  18. Sherbinin A, Reuben A, Kevy MA, Johnson L. 2013. Indicators in Practice: how Environmental Indicators are Being Used in Policy and Management Contexts. Yale University. 1-38.
  19. Simens. 2009. European Green City Index. the Economist Intelligence Unit. 36-39.
  20. Simens. 2011. Asian Green City Index. the Economist Intelligence Unit. 32-35.
  21. Yun HD, Park JY, Choi TB, Choi IT, Noh TH, Han BH, Kim MJ. 2015. A Review on Applicability of Sustainable City Index: Focusing on GCI, EPI and CBI. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 24(6): 593-606. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.6.593

Cited by

  1. 도심광장의 생태적건전성 활성화방안 - 강릉시 교동 광장을 사례로 - vol.26, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5322/jesi.2017.26.7.837
  2. 도시의 공간 확장 및 형태적 특징에 따른 산림녹지의 변화 분석 - 서울, 대구를 중심으로 - vol.33, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2017.33.5.3.7