Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Ontological Meaning of Sociological Interpretations on Architectural Works - Based on Symbolic Interactionism and Habitus -

건축 작품에 대한 사회학적 해석의 존재론적 의미 - 상징적 상호작용론과 아비투스를 기초로 -

  • Received : 2015.09.03
  • Accepted : 2016.02.22
  • Published : 2016.02.29
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Sociological Interpretation on architectural works and design thinking, and architectural critics could be an approach for social sustainable architecture. In the sociological perspective, the paper explores the characteristics of two architectural works and architectural design thinking of Louis I. Kahn's Richards Medical Research Laboratory(1975-60) and Peter Eisenman's House VI(1972-75) and a sociologist Robert Gutman's reviews on two architectural works. The sociological interpretation based on "sociological being" derived from two sociological theories, "Symbolic Interactionism and "Habitus", approaches to the architecture as the world of experience and existence of human being. "Sociological being" based on the definitions of symbolic interaction, habitus, circumstance, social action and practice, reflective ego, and etc. is participated in to interpret two architectural works, design thinking, and architectural reviews. The findings describe the negatives of architectural philosophy(Louis I. Khan) and conceptual architecture(Peter Eisenman) and the ontological meaning of sociological interpretations on architectural works.

Keywords

References

  1. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Trans. to Korean by Park, Y.(1977). Kachi Publishing Co., 28-34. 114-119. 122-125.
  2. Calhoun, C. (2007). Pierre Bourdieu, The Blakwell Companion to Major Social Theorist Edit. by Ritzer, G., Oxford, Blackwell, 712.
  3. Eisenman, P. (2004). Inside out: 1963-1988 selected writings, Yale University Press. xiii.
  4. Hillier. J & Roosby (Ed.) (2005). Habitus, Habitus: A sense of place Edit. by , E, Ashgate, 20-21. 43-49.
  5. Hong, S. (2014). Culture and Habitus, Nanam, 43-44.
  6. Kim, H. (1997). The Relation between Human Actions and Space, Journal of Geography Education, 37, 78-106.
  7. Kim. W. (Trans. to Korean) (2001), Bourdieu, P. (1997). Meditations pascaliennes, Dongmunseon, 258-259.
  8. Luscombe, D. (2014). Architectural concepts in Peter Eisenman's axonometric drawings of House VI, The Journal of Architecture, 19(4), 560-611, 560. 575. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.951064
  9. No, G., Kim, W., Kim, J., Soe, Y. An, B., An, C., Jeong, D., Jeong, T., Ju, H, Choi, G., Choi, S. Hyeon, T. (2000). Understanding of Modern Sociology, Ilsinsa, 24-33.
  10. Park, Y. (2012). La Bourgeoisie françqise du XIXe siecle dans Madame Bovary, etudes de la culture francaise et des arts en France, 40, 153-184. https://doi.org/10.21651/cfaf.2012.40..153
  11. Papademetriou, P. & Mohler, A. (Ed.) (1998). Louis I. Kahn- Conversations with Students, Architecture at Rice Publications & Princeton Architectural Press(Second edition), 8. 19. 52. 53. 141.
  12. Twombly, R. (Ed.) (2003). Louis Kahn Essential Texts, W.W.Norton & Company, 147. 195.
  13. Robbins, D. (2000). Bourdieu and Culture, London, Sage, 27.
  14. Tyng, A(1983), Louis I. Kahn's Philosophy of Architecture, Trans. to Korean by Soe, YS & Lee, KJ(1993), Taerim Munwhasa, 6. 30. 46. 49. 51
  15. Wiseman, C. (2007). Louis I. Kahn: Beyond time and style, Norton, 98. 101. 105.