DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Selecting Personal Protective Equipment for Listed Hazardous Chemicals (1): Analysis of Hazard Ranks and Workplace Exposure Risks

사고대비물질 개인보호구 선정에 관한 연구(1): 물질유해성 및 작업위해성 분석

  • Han, Don-Hee (Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Chung, Sang-Tae (Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Il (Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Sung (Research Development and Education Division, National Institute for Chemical Safety) ;
  • Lee, Chung-Soo (Research Development and Education Division, National Institute for Chemical Safety)
  • 한돈희 (인제대학교 보건안전공학과) ;
  • 정상태 (인제대학교 보건안전공학과) ;
  • 김종일 (인제대학교 보건안전공학과) ;
  • 조용성 (화학물질안전원 연구개발교육과) ;
  • 이청수 (화학물질안전원 연구개발교육과)
  • Received : 2016.08.26
  • Accepted : 2016.12.19
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: According to the new Chemical Control Act from the Korean Ministry of Environment (2014-259), workers handling hazardous chemicals should wear personal protective equipment (PPE). However the act simply states in basic phrases that every worker handling one or more of the 69 listed chemicals should wear PPE and does not consider the unique hazard characteristics of chemicals and work types. The main purpose of this study is to provide basic data to revise the act to suit particular work processes and situations. Methods: The hazard rank of the substances was classified based on hazardous characteristics such as LC50 and vapor pressure using matrix analysis. The workplace exposure risk of the substances was also determined through a matrix analysis based on the previously determined hazard ranks and the demands of manual handling together with the likelihood of accident frequency of the operation combined with the exposure of workers during spill accidents. Results: To meet the demands for developing subsequent guidelines for the risk-based application of PPE in hazardous workplaces, this study sorted the 69 listed chemicals into five hazardous categories based on their LC50 and vapor pressures, and also assigned exposure categories according to exposure vulnerability for various types of work which are frequently performed throughout the life cycle of the chemicals. Conclusion: In the next study, an exposure risk matrix will be produced using the hazard rank of chemicals and workplace exposure risk, and then PPE will be selected to suit the categories of the exposure risk matrix.

Keywords

References

  1. National Institute of Chemical Safety. Chemistry Safety Cleaning-house. Available: http://csc.me.go.kr/statis/occTypeStatisPList.do [accessed 16 August 2016].
  2. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Avaiable: https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012 [accessed 16 August 2016].
  3. Ministry of Environment (ME). Chemicals Control Acts, Act 13890. 2016.
  4. Ministry of Environment (ME). Regulation of personal protective equipments (PPE) for workers handling hazardous chemicals, ME Notice 2014-259. 2014.
  5. Jorg Steinbach. Safety assessment for chemical processes. Berlin: Wiley VCH; 1999. p.11-21.
  6. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER). Key Info Guide. 2012.
  7. Reid RC, Prausnitz JM, Sherwood TK. The properties of gases and liquids, 3rd ed. North Miami Beach: McGraw-Hill; 1977. p.184.
  8. International Labor Organization(ILO). IOMC/GHS Draft integrated proposal, Chapter 5 Acute toxicity, Available: http://www.ilo.org/legacy/english/protection/safework/ghs/ghsfinal/ghsc05.pdf, [accessed 19 February 2016]. p.2-9.
  9. US EPA. RMP Guidance Appendix A, 40 CFR PART 68A, Chemical accident prevention provisions. 1997. p.34.
  10. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). NFPA 704, Standard system for identification of the hazards of materials for emergency response. 2012
  11. Carson PA, Mumford CJ. The safe handling of chemicals in industry, 1st ed. New York: Longman Scientific and Technical; 1988. p.105-110.