Journal of Aerospace System Engineering (항공우주시스템공학회지)

The Society for Aerospace System Engineering (항공우주시스템공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Foreign Military Authority Recognition Questionsets (MARQs)

해외 군당국의 감항인정의제 고찰

  • Roh, Jin Chul (School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Korea Aerospace University) ;
  • Goo, Bon Wook (Defense Acquisition Program Administration) ;
  • Ko, Joon Soo (Defense Acquisition Program Administration)
  • Received : 2016.08.05
  • Accepted : 2016.12.20
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The world is currently confronted with regional conflicts among nations that seek to protect their territory. The associated counter-terrorism activities and international business flows can be increased through airworthiness-recognition tasks that are related to aircraft exports, dispatch troops, and overseas bases. It is important to establish airworthiness-recognition processes between foreign military authorities to minimize the potential for sovereign national positions and responsibilities. For this study, the military airworthiness recognition between recognition partners was surveyed to secure flight safety for the development and operation of aircrafts. The analysis of the U.S. and European Military Authority Recognition Questionsets (MARQs) in this paper introduces the rules, inspection capabilities, production process, and certification of the airworthiness authority. The regulatory activities, which are required by the Korea Military Airworthiness Authority (MAA) with respect to foreign MAAs, can be reduced by the implementation of the MARQ.

국가간의 지역충돌, 영토, 보호, 대테러 그리고 국제 무역 흐름에 직면한 현 세계는 항공기 수출, 부대파견 및 해외 주둔에 연관되어 감항인증 업무가 증가될 수 있다. 주권 국가의 위치와 책임을 최소화하기 위해서 외국 군 당국사이의 감항인증 절차를 확립하는 것은 중요하다. 이 연구는 항공기 개발 및 운영을 위한 비행 안전을 확보하기 위한 인정 파트너 사이의 군 감항 인정을 연구하였다. 이 논문은 감항 당국의 역할, 감독능력, 생산절차 및 인증의 소개로 미국 및 유럽 군 당국의 인정의제를 분석하였다. 군 당국인정인제를 기본으로, 다른 외국 군당국과 한국군감항당국에 의해 요구되는 규정활동을 감소할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. The Korean National Assembly, Act On The Flight Safety Certification Of Military Aircrafts, 2009. 4. 1.
  2. Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Regulation On The Flight Safety Certification Of Military Aircrafts, 2009.12.11
  3. EDC, European Military Airworthiness Document 'Recognition', 2014.8.21.
  4. US Army, Regulation 700-142(Type Classification, Materiel Release, Fielding, and Transfer), 2013. 1.17.
  5. US Army, Regulation 70-62(Airworthiness Qualification of US Army Aircraft Systems), 2000. 7. 7.
  6. US Navy, OPNAVINST 3710.7 (Standardization General Flight And Operating Instructions), 2004. 4. 1
  7. US Navy, NAVAIRINST 13034.1(Flight Clearance Policy For Air Vehicles And Aircraft Systems), 2004. 9.28.
  8. Department of Defense, Directive 5030.61, 2013. 5.24.
  9. US Air Force, Policy Directive 62-6, 2010. 6.11.
  10. Joon soo Ko, Kyungmok Kim, "Certification Criteria and Safety Assessment for High Altitude Long Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicle", Journal of Aerospace System Engineering, Vol 10, No 2, 2016
  11. US Army, Regulation 95-1(Flight Regulations), 2008.11.12
  12. US Army, CNAFINST 4790.2(The Naval Aviation Maintenance Program (NAMP)), 2013. 6.15.
  13. US Army, Regulation 750-1(Army Materiel Maintenance Policy), 2013. 9.12.
  14. Department of Defense Joint Service Specification Guide 2001 Air Vehicle, 2000. 4. 15.
  15. US Air Force, Instruction 62-601, 2010. 6.11.
  16. Heekweon Yoon, Sangchul Lee, "A Study on the Airworthiness Certification of korean Indigenously Developed Military Aircrafts", Journal of Aerospace System Engineering, Vol 1, No 2, 2007
  17. Department of Defense , Directive 5030.61, 2013. 5.24.