DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current Status and Implication for the Planning of Emergency Shelter Considering Users' Habitability

사용자의 거주성을 고려한 이재민 임시주거시설 현황 분석과 계획적 시사점

  • 김미경 (충북대학교 주거환경학과) ;
  • 김은정 (연세대학교 생활디자인학과)
  • Received : 2016.10.03
  • Accepted : 2016.12.20
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

The study aims to identify the existing problems and suggests the implication for the planning of emergency shelter in terms of users' habitability. The results of the study show that the concept of shelters for disaster victims need to set up and be distinctively defined as emergency phase and temporary residency phase. In emergency phase, the various types of buildings and facilities should be considered as temporary shelters for disaster victims such as transitional shelters including the public facilities. Based on the results of the critical review, this research proposed an analytic framework emphasizing habitability for disaster victims including vulnerable people such as the disabled, the aged, women and children. The framework is composed of four dimensions: safety, health, convenience and comfortability. The manual guidelines for emergency shelters should reflect the barrier-free design or universal design for various types of disaster victims considering habitability to provide the positive opportunity and future hope for restoration after disaster. This research can be a basis for the planning and application of temporary shelters for disaster victims.

Keywords

References

  1. Esnard. A., Sapat, A., Displaced by Disaster: Recovery and Resilience in a Globalizing World, NY, Routledge, 2014
  2. FEMA, Design and Construction Guidance for Community Shelters, 2000
  3. FEMA, National Disaster Housing Strategy, 2009
  4. Kronenburg, R., Architecture in Motion: The History and Development of Portable Building, NY, Routledge, 2014
  5. Sanderson, D., Burnel, J., Beyond Shelter after Disaster: Practice, Process and Possibilities, NY, Routledge, 2013
  6. Tokyo Metropolitan Government, Tokyo Disaster Prevention Plan, 2014
  7. UNISDR, Guidance Note on Recovery Shelter, 2010
  8. Queensland Government, Design Guidelines for Queensland Public Cyclone Shelters, 2006
  9. 이호숭, 재해약자를 배려한 구호디자인 연구, 건국대 박사논문, 2014
  10. 김민경.문혁.김혜정.김경숙, 재해재난시 응급대피공간의 거주계획요소에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 제27권 제6호, 2011.6
  11. 문정인.이상호, 재해.재난에 따른 임시주거 유형에 관한 사례연구, 대한건축학회지, 제22권 제9호, 2006.9
  12. Nemoto, M., Ariga, E., 재난발생시 재난약자에 대한 지역사회 지원체계 강화방안 연구-한,일 양국의 재난약자에 대한 사전조사 체계 비교를 중심으로-, 한국위기관리논집, 제10권 제6호, 2015.6
  13. Iwasa, A. et al., A Practical Approach to Temporary Housing for Disaster Victims, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.11, No.1, 2012.5
  14. 국립재난안전연구원, 대피시설 선정.관리절차 개선방안 연구보고서, 2014
  15. 국립재난안전연구원, 재난유형별 대피소 통합관리 및 대피생활 지원 기술개발 연구보고서, 2014
  16. 국민안전처, 2015 재해구호계획수립지침, 2015.5
  17. 국제이주기구(IOM).유엔난민기구(UNHCR), 이재민 임시수용시설 안내서, 2010
  18. 국토교통부.국토교통과학기술진흥원, 재난재해대비 임시거주공간 시스템 개발 최종보고서, 2014
  19. 한국건축가협회.공공봉사위원회, 국가적 재해재난시 응급 주거 공간의 최소기준 수립발표, 2011
  20. 후지사와시 재해대책과, 일본 후지사와 대피소 매뉴얼, 2010
  21. 강남구, '구룡마을 화재 이재민 조속한 이주대책 마련'호소, 2014. 11.3, 강남구 보도자료, http://www.gangnam.go.kr
  22. 김윤호, [현장에서] 대피소 없어 비닐하우스서...'지진 노숙자' 만든 한국, 중앙일보, 2016.9.22 http://news.joins.com/article/20619340
  23. 세월호 참사, 체육관은 비어 가는데, 연합뉴스, 2014.5.12 http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=001&aid=0006902106
  24. 306 보충대로 간 의정부 화재피해 주민들, 한겨례신문, 2015.1.25 http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/675175.html
  25. http://www.law.go.kr
  26. http://www.mpss.go.kr
  27. http://www.safekorea.go.kr

Cited by

  1. Research Composition of Space and Current Situation of Domestic Temporary Evacuation Facility for Responding to Korea Social Disaster vol.28, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2017.28.6.011