Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety (한국식품위생안전성학회지)

The Korean Society of Food Hygiene and Safety (한국식품위생안전성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Recovery Rate of Food-borne Pathogens according to Sample Preparation Methods in Animal Origin Foods

축산식품 중 전처리 방법에 따른 식중독균 회수율 분석

  • Kim, Jong-Hui (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Hyoun Wook (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ham, Jun-Sang (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Bu-Min (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Oh, Mi-Hwa (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 김종희 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김현욱 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 함준상 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김부민 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 오미화 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Received : 2016.09.02
  • Accepted : 2016.09.28
  • Published : 2016.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate and establish a sample preparation method for the detection of food-borne pathogens in animal origin foods. Ham, yogurt, and Korean beef inoculated with Escherichia coli O157:H7, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella Typhimurium, were tested for the effects of diluent composition, processing time, and proportion of diluent to sample. The diluents used were peptone water (PW), Saline solution (SS), Butterfield's phosphate buffered dilution water (BPD), and Buffered peptone water (BPW). The processing time periods considered for the samples were 30, 60, 90, 120, and 300 sec, and the proportions of diluent to samples tested were 1:2, 1:4, 1:9, and 1:19. Yogurt and beef showed the highest number of bacteria when treated with BPW (p < 0.05). However, ham showed no significant difference between the treatments with four different diluents. Optimum proportions of diluent to ham, yogurt, and beef were 1:9, 1:2, and 1:4, respectively. The processing time of 120 sec was chosen as optimum, because it showed the best recovery rate in all sample types. In this manner, detection of food-borne bacteria with the selected optimal conditions was indicated by a recovery rate of more than 85%. These data suggest that an appropriate diluent composition and diluent volume should be used depending on the type of sample, which would thereby increase the accuracy of detecting food-borne bacteria in animal origin foods.

본 연구는 축산식품으로부터 식중독균 검출을 위한 시료 전처리법을 확립하기 위해 전처리용액, 균질화 시간, 시료와 전처리용액의 비율에 따른 회수율을 비교하였다. 이를 위하여 햄, 발효유, 소고기에 E. coli O157:H7, S. aureus, S. Typhimurium를 7.0 log CFU/g로 접종하고 PW, SS, BPD, BPW로 처리하였다. 또한 균질화 시간은 30, 60, 90, 120, 300초, 시료와 전처리용액 비율은 1:2, 1:4, 1:9, 1:19로 각각 처리하였다. 그 결과 발효유와 소고기에서는 BPW로 처리하였을 때 전반적으로 식중독균의 회수율이 높았으나(p < 0.05), 햄의 경우에는 전처리 용액에 따른 유의적 차이는 없다. 전처리용액의 최적 비율은 햄, 발효유, 소고기가 각각 1:9, 1:2, 1:4였으며(p < 0.05), 균질화 시간은 모든 시료에서 120초로 처리했을 때 유의적으로 가장 높은 회수율이 나타났다(p < 0.05). 따라서 선정된 최적 전처리 조건에서 식중독균 회수율을 수행한 결과 모든 시료 및 균종에서 85%이상의 높은 회수율을 보였다. 이상의 결과를 종합해 볼 때 축산식품으로부터 식중독균 검출을 위한 전처리 용액 및 시료와 전처리용액의 비율은 시료의 종류에 따라 적절한 것으로 사용하는 것이 식중독균 검출의 정확성을 높일 수 있을 것으로 판단되어진다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hong, S. H., Park, N. Y., Jo, H. J., Ro, E. Y., Ko, Y. M., Na, Y. J. and Moon, J. S.: Risk Ranking Determination of Combination of Foodborne Pathogens and Livestock or Livestock Products. J. Fd Hyg. Safety, 30, 1-12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2015.30.1.1
  2. MIAFF(Minstry of food, agriculture, forestry and fisheries): Statistics of food, agriculture, forestry and fisheries 2014. (2016).
  3. Na, H. M., Bae, S. Y., Koh, B. R. D., Jang, M. S., Sung, C. M., Kim, J. Y. and Kim, Y. H.: Survey in consumers and distribution stages bacteriological analysis for fresh raw beef in Gwangju area, Korea. Korean Journal of Veterinary Service, 35, 313-319 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2012.35.4.313
  4. KFDA: Korea Food and Drug Administration, Osong, Korea. Available from: http://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/portal.healthyfoodlife/foodpoisoningStat.do,Accessed on Aug. 24, (2016).
  5. Kim, J. S., Lee, G. G., Park, J. S., Jung, Y. H., Kwak, H. S., Kim, S. B. and Kwon, S. T.: A novel multiplex PCR assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of five pathogenic bacteria: Escherichia coli O157: H7, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Food Prot., 70, 1656-1662 (2007). https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-70.7.1656
  6. Xue, X., Pan, J., Xie, H., Wang, J. and Zhang, S.: Fluorescence detection of total count of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus on water-soluble CdSe quantum dots coupled with bacteria. Talanta, 77, 1808-1813 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.10.025
  7. Nero, L. A., De Mattos, M. R., de Aguiar Ferreira Barros, M., Ortolani, M. B. T., Beloti, V. and de Melo Franco, B. D. G.: Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. in raw milk produced in Brazil: occurrence and interference of indigenous microbiota in their isolation and development. Zoonoses Public Health, 55, 299-305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01130.x
  8. Clavero, M. R. and Beuchat, L. R.: Survival of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in broth and processed salami as influenced by pH, water activity, and temperature and suitability of media for its recovery. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62, 2735-2740 (1996).
  9. Conner, D. E. and Hall, G. S.: Efficacy of selected media for recovery of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from frozen chicken meat containing sodium chloride, sodium lactate or polyphosphate. Food Microbiol., 11, 337-344 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1994.1038
  10. Jiang, J., Larkin, C., Steele, M., Poppe, C. and Odumeru, J. A.: Evaluation of universal preenrichment broth for the recovery of foodborne pathogens from milk and cheese. J. Dairy Sci., 81, 2798-2803 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75838-2
  11. Barkocy-Gallagher, G. A., Berry, E. D., Rivera-Betancourt, M., Arthur, T. M., Nou, X. and Koohmaraie, M.; Development of methods for the recovery of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella from beef carcass sponge samples and bovine fecal and hide samples. J. Food Prot., 65, 1527-1534 (2002). https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-65.10.1527
  12. KFDA: Korea Food and Drug Administration, Osong, Korea (2015).
  13. Kim, M. H., Kim, W. J., Shin, W. S., Shon, D. H. and Cha, S. K.: Feasibility study on the use of liposomes for detecting food-borne pathogenic bacteria. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour., 23, 278-283 (2003).
  14. Kim, S. R., Choi, S. Y., Seo, M. K., Lee, J. Y., Kim, W. I., Yoon, Y., and Kim, B. S.: Establishment of sample preparation method to enhance recovery of food-borne pathogens from produce. J. Fd. Hyg. Safety, 28, 279-285 (2013). https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2013.28.3.279
  15. Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency: Veterinary Research and Quarantine Report (2001).