대한지리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Geographical Society)

대한지리학회 (The Korean Geographical Society)
권호 표지

새로운 정치생태학을 위한 비인간지리학의 인간-자연 연구

More-than-human Geographies of Nature: Toward a Careful Political Ecology

  • 최명애 (옥스퍼드대학교 지리환경학과)
  • Choi, Myung-Ae (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford)
  • 투고 : 2016.10.10
  • 심사 : 2016.10.31
  • 발행 : 2016.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

'인류세'라는 새로운 지질학적 연대가 도래했다는 최근 지질학계의 주장은 인간 사회와 자연을 분리된 것으로 여겨온 기존의 대중적 인식에 균열을 가져오고 있다. 인문지리학자들은 인류세 논의가 시작되기 오래전부터 이같은 이분법적 인식을 해체하고 인간과 자연의 관계를 새롭게 이해하기 위한 이론들을 개발해 왔다. 본 논문은 이같은 이론적 논의의 최전선에 있는 '비인간지리학(more-than-human geography)'의 주요 개념, 논쟁, 연구 성과를 소개, 국내 정치생태학 논의의 이론적 지평을 넓히고자 한다. 최근 영미 정치생태학계에서 비인간지리학은 인간-자연 관계를 이해하고 형성하는 데 있어 그간 소외돼 온 비인간 행위자의 활약에 주목함으로써, 인간 행위자 중심의 기존 연구를 발전시킬 수 있는 새로운 이론으로 주목받고 있다. 이 이론은 2000년대 전후 지리학계에서 발생한 '물질적, 수행적 전환'에서 출발, 인간과 자연의 물질성에 주목하고, 이를 통해 자연에 대한 구조주의적 이해와 생산주의적 이해를 넘어서고자 한다. 비인간지리학자들은 행위자-연결망 이론, 비재현 이론, 생기철학에 이론적 기반을 두고, 비인간 행위성(nonhuman agency)과 감응(affect) 등의 개념을 통해 인간-자연 관계를 분석한다. 비인간지리학에서 자연은 다양하고 이질적인 인간 및 비인간 행위자들의 수행(performance)에 따른 결과물로 인식되며, 네트워크 행위자들의 다양한 수행에 따라 끊임없이 새롭게 만들어지는 것으로 생각된다. 이같은 혼종적, 과정적, 내재적 존재론에 기반을 두고, 비인간지리학은 비인간 행위자와 비재현적 소통이 인간-자연 관계의 이해와 형성에 깊이 개입돼 있다고 보고, 자연에 대한 정치적, 윤리적 결정에 있어 비인간 행위자를 적극 포함시켜야 한다고 주장한다.

The recent diagnosis of the Anthropocene challenges public understanding of nature as a pure and singular entity removed from society, as the diagnosis confirms the earth-changing force of humans. In geography, the nature-society divide has been critically interrogated long before the diagnosis of the Anthropocene, developing several ways of theorizing nature-society relations. This paper introduces a new frontier for such theoretical endeavors: more-than-human geography. Inspired by the material and performative turn in geography and the social sciences around the 2000s, more-than-human geographers have sought to re-engage with the livingness of the world in the study of nature-society relations. Drawing on actor-network theory, non-representational theory (NRT) and vitalism, they have developed innovative ways of thinking about and relating to nature through the key concepts of 'nonhuman agency' and 'affect'. While more-than-human geography has been extensively debated and developed in recent Euro-American scholarship on cultural and economic geography, it has so far received limited attention in Korean geographical studies on nature. This paper aims to address this gap by discussing the key concepts and seminal work of more-than-human geography. I first outline four theoretical strands through which nature-society relations are perceived in geography. I then offer an overview of more-than-human geography, discussing its theoretical foundations and considering ontologies, epistemologies, politics and ethics associated with nature-society relations. Then, I compare more-than-human geography with political ecology, which is the mainstream critical approach in contemporary environmental social sciences. I would argue that more-than-human geography further challenges and develops political ecology through its heightened attention to the affective capacity of nonhumans and the methodological ethos of doing a careful political ecology. I conclude by reflecting on the implications of more-than-human geography for Korean studies on nature-society relations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams, W., 2009, Green development: Environment and sustainability in a developing world, 3rd edition, Routledge, Abingdon.
  2. Adams, W., 2013, Against extinction: The story of conservation, Earthscan, London.
  3. Agrawal, A., 2002, Indigenous knowledge and the politics of classification, International Social Science Journal, 54(173), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00382
  4. Anderson, B., 2009, Affective atmospheres, Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005
  5. Anderson, B., 2014, Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Surrey.
  6. Anderson, T. L. & Leal, D., 2001, Free market environmentalism, Palgrave, New York.
  7. Bakker, K., 2003, An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing water in England and Wales, Oxford University Press, USA.
  8. Bakker, K., 2010, The limits of 'neoliberal natures': Debating green neoliberalism, Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 715-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510376849
  9. Bakker, K. & Bridge, G., 2006, Material worlds? Resource geographies and the 'matter of nature', Progress in Human Geography, 30(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph588oa
  10. Barua, M., 2013, Circulating elephants: Unpacking the geographies of a cosmopolitan animal, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(4), 559-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12047
  11. Barua, M., 2014, Bio-geo-graphy: landscape, dwelling, and the political ecology of human-elephant relations, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5), 915-934. https://doi.org/10.1068/d4213
  12. Bear, C. & Eden, S., 2011, Thinking like a fish? Engaging with nonhuman difference through recreational angling, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(2), 336-352. https://doi.org/10.1068/d1810
  13. Bennett, J., 2005, The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout, Public Culture, 17(3), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-17-3-445
  14. Bennett, J., 2009, Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
  15. Bingham, N., 2006, Bees, butterflies, and bacteria: Biotechnology and the politics of nonhuman friendship, Environment and Planning A, 38(3), 483-498. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38436
  16. Bingham, N. & Hinchliffe, S., 2008, Reconstituting natures: Articulating other modes of living together, Geoforum, 39(1), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.008
  17. Braun, B., 2003, Nature and culture: On the career of a false problem, in Duncan, J., Johnson, N. & Schein, R. (eds), A companion to cultural geography, 151-179.
  18. Braun, B., 2005, Environmental issues: Writing a more-thanhuman urban geography, Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph574pr
  19. Braun, B., 2007, Theorizing the nature-society divide, in Cox, K., Low, M., & Robinson, J. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Political Geography, 189-203.
  20. Braun, B., 2008, Environmental issues: Inventive life, Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 667-679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507088030
  21. Brockington, D. & Duffy, R., 2011, Capitalism and conservation, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  22. Buller, H., 2008, Safe from the wolf: Biosecurity, biodiversity, and competing philosophies of nature, Environment and Planning A, 40(7), 1583-1597. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4055
  23. Callon, M., 1986, Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, The Sociological Review, 32(S1), 196-233.
  24. Carrington, D., 2016, The Anthropocene epoch: scientists declare dawn of human-influenced age, The Guardian, 29-Aug-2016, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/29/declare-anthropoceneepoch-experts-urge-geological-congress-humanimpact-earth.
  25. Carter, S. & Mccormack, D. P., 2006, Film, geopolitics and the affective logics of intervention, Political Geography, 25(2), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.11.004
  26. Castree, N., 2005, Nature, Routledge, London.
  27. Castree, N., 2008, Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation, Environment and Planning A, 40(1), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3999
  28. Castree, N., 2014, Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current contributions, Geography Compass, 8(7), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12140
  29. Castree, N. & Braun, B., 2001, Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford; Malden, MA.
  30. Choi, M-A., 2016, Governing Deceleration: The natures, times and spaces of ecotourism in South Korea, PhD thesis, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford.
  31. Clark, N., 2011, Inhuman nature: sociable life on a dynamic planet, Sage Publications.
  32. Cloke, P. & Perkins, H. C., 2005, Cetacean performance and tourism in Kaikoura, New Zealand, Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 23(6), 903-924. https://doi.org/10.1068/d57j
  33. Coleman, S. & Crang, M., 2002, Tourism: Between place and performance, Berghahn Books, New York: Oxford.
  34. Crang, M., 2003, Qualitative methods: Touchy, feely, looksee?, Progress in Human Geography, 27(4), 494-504. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph445pr
  35. Crang, M., 2011, Tourist: Moving places, becoming tourist, becoming ethnographer. in Cresswell, T. & Merriman, P. (eds.) Geographies of mobilities: Practice, Ashgate, Surrey.
  36. Cronon, W., 1996, The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. in Cronon, W. (ed.) Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature, WW Norton & Company, New York.
  37. Crouch, D., 2001, Spatialities and the feeling of doing, Social & Cultural Geography, 2(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360020028276
  38. De Castro, E. V., 1998, Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469-488. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157
  39. Demeritt, D., 2002, What is the 'social construction of nature'? A typology and sympathetic critique, Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph402oa
  40. Dewsbury, J. D., Harrison, P., Rose, M. & Wylie, J., 2002, Enacting geographies, Geoforum, 33(4), 437-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00029-5
  41. Foucault, M., 1978, The history of sexuality, volume I, Vintage, New York.
  42. Franklin, A. & Crang, M., 2001, The trouble with tourism and travel theory?, Tourist Studies, 1(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879760100100101
  43. Fraser, M., Kember, S. & Lury, C., 2005, Inventive life: Approaches to the new vitalism, Theory, Culture & Society, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405048431
  44. Gibson, J. J., 1979, The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
  45. Ginn, F., 2014, Sticky lives: Slugs, detachment and morethan- human ethics in the garden, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(4), 532-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12043
  46. Greenhough, B., 2010, Vitalist geographies: Life and the more-than-human, in Harrison, P. & Anderson, B. (eds), Taking-Place: Non-representational theories and geography, Ashgate, Surrey, 37-54.
  47. Greenhough, B., 2012, Where species meet and mingle: Endemic human-virus relations, embodied communication and more-than-human agency at the Common Cold Unit 1946-90, Cultural Geographies, 19(3), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474011422029
  48. Haraway, D., 1988, Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, Feminist Studies, 575-599.
  49. Haraway, D., 2008, When species meet, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  50. Harrison, P. & Anderson, B., 2012, Taking-Place: Non-representational theories and geography, Ashgate, Surrey.
  51. Hayes-Conroy, A. & Martin, D. G., 2010, Mobilising bodies: Visceral identification in the Slow Food movement, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(2), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00374.x
  52. Heynen, N., Mccarthy, J., Prudham, S. & Robbins, P., 2007, Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences, Routledge, Oxford, New York.
  53. Hinchliffe, S., 2007, Geographies of nature: Societies, environments, ecologies, Sage, London.
  54. Hinchliffe, S., 2008, Reconstituting nature conservation: Towards a careful political ecology, Geoforum, 39(1), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.007
  55. Hinchliffe, S. & Bingham, N., 2008, Securing life: The emerging practices of biosecurity, Environment and Planning A, 40(7), 1534-1551. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4054
  56. Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M. B., Degen, M. & Whatmore, S., 2005, Urban wild things: a cosmopolitical experiment, Environment and planning D: Society and Space, 23(5), 643-658. https://doi.org/10.1068/d351t
  57. Hinchliffe, S. & Whatmore, S., 2006, Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality, Science as Culture, 15(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430600707988
  58. Hobson, K., 2007, Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography, Political Geography, 26(3), 250-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.10.010
  59. Hwang, J-T., 2015, A study of state-nature relations in a developmental state: The water resource policy of the Park Jung-Hee regime 1961-79, Environment and Planning A, 47(9), 1926-1943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15594922
  60. Hwang, J-T., 2016, The production of riskscapes in the Korean developmental state: A perspective from East Asia, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 51(2) 283-303 (in Korean).
  61. Hwang, J-T. & Park, B-G., 2013, Seeing the state-nature relation in South Korea from the perspective of political ecology, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 48(3), 348-365 (in Korean).
  62. Jin, J-H., 2013, Landscape as representation or practice: Focused on the examination of the theory of landscape as 'a way of seeing', Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 48(4), 557-574 (in Korean).
  63. Jones, O. & Cloke, P., 2002, Tree cultures: The place of trees and trees in their place, Berg, Oxford.
  64. Kim, H-S., 2006, Key issues in Sociology of Technology and Science, Moonhak gwa Jiseong Seoul.
  65. Kim, N-H., & Kim, S-J., 2013, Revealing geography of water in Taebaek City through actor-network theory, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 48(3), 366-386 (in Korean).
  66. Kim, S-J., 2006, The production of eco-environmental space and its hybridity: The case of Cheonggyecheon, Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 9(2), 113-124 (in Korean).
  67. Kim, S-J., 2010, Re-understanding of technoscience and nature through actor-network theory, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 45(4), 461-477 (in Korean).
  68. Kim, S-J., 2016, Assembalge and its geographical implication, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 51(3), 311-326 (in Korean).
  69. Kim, S-J. & Wainwright, J., 2010, When seed fails: The contested nature of neoliberalism in South Korea, Geoforum, 41(5), 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.002
  70. Kim S-Y., Ojo G., Zaidi R. & Bryant, R., 2012, Bringing the other into political ecology: Reflecting on preoccupations in a research field, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 33(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2012.00453.x
  71. Latour, B., 1987, Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  72. Latour, B., 1993, We have never been modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  73. Latour, B., 2004, Politics of nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  74. Latour, B., 2007, Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  75. Laurier, E., 2010, Participant observation, in Clifford, N., French, S. & Valentine, G. (eds.) Key methods in geography, Sage, London.
  76. Law, J., 2010, Care and killing: Tensions in veterinary practice, in Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (eds), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms, Transcript Publishers, Bielefeld, Germany, 57-71.
  77. Lee, J-C., 2015, Trap-neuter-return and the politics of coexistence with stray cats from the perspective of actornetwork theory, MSc dissertation, Department of Environmental Planning, The Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University (in Korean).
  78. Lorimer, H., 2005, Cultural geography: The busyness of being 'more-than-representational', Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph531pr
  79. Lorimer, H., 2006, Herding memories of humans and animals, Environment and planning D: Society and Space, 24(4), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1068/d381t
  80. Lorimer, H., 2007, Cultural geography: Worldly shapes, differently arranged, Progress in Human Geography, 31(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507073540
  81. Lorimer, H., 2008, Cultural geography: Non-representational conditions and concerns, Progress in Human Geography, 32(4), 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507086882
  82. Lorimer, H., 2009, Caught in the nick of time: Archives and fieldwork, in DeLyser, D., Herbert, S., Aitken, S., Crang, M., & McDowell, L. (eds), The handbook of qualitative methods in human geography, SAGE Publications, London, 248-273.
  83. Lorimer, J., 2006, What about the nematodes? Taxonomic partialities in the scope of UK biodiversity conservation, Social & Cultural Geography, 7(4), 539-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360600825687
  84. Lorimer, J., 2008, Counting corncrakes: The affective science of the UK corncrake census, Social Studies of Science, 38(3), 377-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084396
  85. Lorimer, J., 2009, Posthumanism/posthumanistic geographies, in Kitchin, R. & Thrift, N. (eds), International encyclopedia of human geography, Elsevier, 344-354.
  86. Lorimer, J., 2010a, Elephants as companion species: The lively biogeographies of Asian elephant conservation in Sri Lanka, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(4), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00395.x
  87. Lorimer, J., 2010b, International conservation 'volunteering'and the geographies of global environmental citizenship, Political Geography, 29(6), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.06.004
  88. Lorimer, J., 2012, Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene, Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 593-612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511435352
  89. Lorimer, J., 2015, Wildlife in the Anthropocean: Conservation after nature, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  90. Lorimer, J. & Driessen, C., 2013a, Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle, Geoforum, 48, 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.002
  91. Lorimer, J. & Driessen, C., 2013b, Wild experiments at the Oostvaardersplassen: Rethinking environmentalism in the Anthropocene, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12030
  92. Lorimer, J. & Whatmore, S., 2009, After the 'king of beasts': Samuel Baker and the embodied historical geographies of elephant hunting in mid-nineteenth-century Ceylon, Journal of Historical Geography, 35(4), 668-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2008.11.002
  93. Macnaghten, P. & Urry, J., 2001, Bodies of nature, Sage, London.
  94. McCarthy, J. & Prudham, S., 2004, Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism, Geoforum, 35(3), 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.003
  95. McCormack, D. P., 2003, An event of geographical ethics in spaces of affect, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 488-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.2003.00106.x
  96. McCormack, D. P., 2008, Engineering affective atmospheres on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andree expedition, Cultural Geographies, 15(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008094314
  97. Michael, M., 2000, These boots are made for walking...: Mundane technology, the body and human-environment relations, Body & Society, 6(3-4), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006003006
  98. Mol, A., 2002, The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
  99. Murdoch, J., 2005, Post-structuralist geography: A guide to relational space, Sage, London.
  100. Nam, J-Y., 2014, Free Jedol: The biopolitics of captive dolphin release in South Korea, MSc dissertation, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol.
  101. Nast, H. J., 2006, Loving…. whatever: Alienation, neoliberalism and pet-love in the twenty-first century, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 5(2), 300-327.
  102. O'Connor, J., 1988, Capitalism, nature, socialism: A theoretical introduction, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 1(1), 11-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455758809358356
  103. Park, K-H., 2014, An exploration on the applicability of actor-netowrk theory in human geogaphy at the age of globalization, Jounral of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 17(1), 57-78 (in Korean).
  104. Philo, C. & Wilbert, C., 2000, Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of human-animal relations, Routledge, Oxford; New York.
  105. Pile, S., 2010, Emotions and affect in recent human geography, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00368.x
  106. Pons, P. O., 2003, Being-on-holiday: Tourist dwelling, bodies and place, Tourist Studies, 3(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797603040530
  107. Raffles, H., 2003, Intimate knowledge, International Social Science Journal, 54, 325-335.
  108. Rose, G., 1997, Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics, Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122
  109. Rutherford, S., 2011, Governing the wild: Ecotours of power, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
  110. Smith, N., 1984, Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space, University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA.
  111. Smith, N., 2007, Nature as accumulation strategy, Socialist Register, 43, 19-41.
  112. Song, W-S., 2015, From representational geography to nonrepresentational geography: Paradigm shifts of landscape studies in Anglophone cultural and historical Geography, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 50(3), 305-323 (in Korean).
  113. Spencer, T. & Whatmore, S., 2001, Editorial: Bio-geographies: putting life back into the discipline, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(2), 139-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00011
  114. Srinivasan, K., 2013, The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: Dog control and care in the UK and India, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00501.x
  115. Stassart, P. M. & Whatmore, S., 2003, Metabolising risk: Food scares and the un/re-making of Belgian beef, Environment & Planning A, 35(3), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3513
  116. Thrift, N., 2004, Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x
  117. Thrift, N., 2007, Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect, Routledge, Abingdon.
  118. Tsing, A., 2005, Friction: An ethnography of global connection, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  119. Vannini, P., 2015, Non-representational methodologies: Reenvisioning research, Routledge, Abingdon.
  120. Whatmore, S., 2002, Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces, Sage, London.
  121. Whatmore, S., 2006, Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world, Cultural Geographies, 13(4), 600-609. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa
  122. Wilson, A., 1991, The culture of nature: North American landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez, Between the lines, Toronto, Canada.