The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics (응용통계연구)

The Korean Statistical Society (한국통계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Comparison of Estimation Methods for Dynamic Conditional Correlation

DCC 모형에서 동태적 상관계수 추정법의 효율성 비교

  • Lee, Jiho (Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Seong, Byeongchan (Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University)
  • 이지호 (중앙대학교 응용통계학과) ;
  • 성병찬 (중앙대학교 응용통계학과)
  • Received : 2015.08.21
  • Accepted : 2015.09.26
  • Published : 2015.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We compare the performance of two representative estimation methods for the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) GARCH model. The first method is the pairwise estimation which exploits partial information from the paired series, irrespective to the time series dimension. The second is the multi-dimensional estimation that uses full information of the time series. As a simulation for the comparison, we generate a multivariate time series similar to those observed in real markets and construct a DCC GARCH model. As an empirical example, we constitute various portfolios using real KOSPI 200 sector indices and estimate volatility and VaR of the portfolios. Through the estimated dynamic correlations from the simulation and the estimated volatility and value at risk (VaR) of the portfolios, we evaluate the performance of the estimations. We observe that the multi-dimensional estimation tends to be superior to pairwise estimation; in addition, relatively-uncorrelated series can improve the performance of the multi-dimensional estimation.

본 논문에서는 다변량 DCC(dynamic conditional correlation) GARCH 모형에서 동태적 상관계수를 추정하기 위한 대표적 방법인 쌍별 추정법과 다차원 추정법의 효율성을 비교한다. 이를 위하여 금융 시장의 변동성을 반영하는 다변량 시계열을 생성하고 이에 대한 DCC GARCH 모형을 수립 및 추정하는 시뮬레이션을 실시하였다. 또한 KOSPI 200 섹터지수를 이용하여 포트폴리오를 구성하고 이의 변동성 추정 및 VaR 계산을 통하여 동태적 상관계수 추정에 대한 정확성을 평가하였다. 그 결과로서, 전반적으로 다차원 추정법이 쌍별 추정법보다 우수함을 발견하였다. 특히, 다차원 추정법에서 상대적으로 상관관계가 낮은 시계열을 추가할수록 쌍별 시계열에 대한 동태적 상관계수 추정의 정확성을 높여줌을 발견하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aielli, G. P. (2013). Dynamic conditional correlation: On properties and estimation, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 31, 171-194.
  2. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  3. Bollerslev, T. (1990). Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: A multivariate gener- alized ARCH model, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 498-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109358
  4. Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. F. and Wooldridge, J. M. (1988). A capital asset pricing model with time-varying covariances, The Journal of Political Economy, 96, 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1086/261527
  5. Dajcman, S. and Festic, M. (2012). Interdependence between the Slovenian and European stock markets-a DCC-GARCH analysis, Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 25, 379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2012.11517513
  6. Ding, Z., Granger, C. W. and Engle, R. F. (1993). A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model, Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-5398(93)90006-D
  7. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom in ation, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 45, 987-1007.
  8. Engle, R. F. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregres- sive conditional heteroskedasticity models, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487
  9. Engle, R. F. and Kroner, K. F. (1995). Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH, Econometric Theory, 11, 122-150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600009063
  10. Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks, The Journal of Finance, 48, 1779-1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x
  11. Kim, W. H. (2014). Time-varying comovement of KOSPI 200 sector indices returns, CSAM (Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods), 21, 335-347.
  12. Marcucci, J. (2005). Forecasting stock market volatility with regime-switching GARCH models, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 9, 1-55.
  13. Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 59, 347-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
  14. Orskaug, E. (2009). Multivariate DCC-GARCH model with various error distributions, Working paper, Norwegian Computing Center, SAMBA/19/09.
  15. Pagan, A. R. and Schwert, G. W. (1990). Alternative models for conditional stock volatility, Journal of Econometrics, 45, 267-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90101-X
  16. Schwert, A. (2010). Crisis period forecast evaluation of the DCC-GARCH Model yang ding, Doctoral dissertation, Duke University Durham.
  17. Sener, E., Baronyan, S. and Menguturk, L. A. (2012). Ranking the predictive performances of value-at-risk estimation methods, International Journal of Forecasting, 28, 849-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.10.002
  18. Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of Financial Time Series, Wiley.
  19. Xu, C. and Chen, H. (2012). Measuring portfolio value at risk, Working paper, Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University.