DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Classification of Forest Types and Estimation of Succession Index in the Natural Forest of Jirisan(Mt.)

지리산 천연림의 유형 분류 및 천이지수 추정

  • 임선미 (강원대학교 산림경영학과) ;
  • 김지홍 (강원대학교 산림경영학과)
  • Received : 2015.05.12
  • Accepted : 2015.07.13
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

On the basis of vegetation data by point quarter sampling method, the natural forest of Jirisan(Mt.) was classified into eight forest types by cluster analysis. They were Quercus mogolica forest type, Fraxinus mandshurica - Betula costata forest type, Mixed mesophytic forest type, Abies koreana forest type, Carpinus laxiflora forest type, Quercus serrata forest type, Pinus densiflora forest type, and Quercus variabilis forest type. Then, succession index was estimated for each forest type so as to evaluate succession process comparatively among forest types. The results showed that Carpinus laxiflora forest type had highest succession index of 219.7, followed by Mixed mesophytic forest type with little difference of the index of 218.3. Pinus densiflora forest type had lowest index. Succession indices were hardly correlated with species diversity indices of forest types. We presumed that the higher value of succession index a forest type had, the closer toward the climax forest. However, the estimated index was not supposed to be absolute level of successional stage, but it could play a role of comparative assessment in the position of the seral stage among forest types.

본 연구는 지리산 일대 천연림에서 점표본법인 사분법에 의해서 수집한 식생자료를 바탕으로 cluster 분석법을 이용하여 산림형을 분류하였다. 연구 대상림은 신갈나무림형, 들메나무-거제수나무림형, 중생혼합림형, 구상나무림형, 서어나무림형, 졸참나무림형, 소나무림형, 굴참나무림형 등 8개의 산림형으로 분류되었다. 분류된 8개의 산림형들의 천이 진행 정도를 비교 평가하기 위하여 각 산림형별로 천이지수를 산출하였다. 연구 결과, 서어나무림형의 천이지수가 219.7로 산출되어 가장 높았고, 미미한 차이의 천이지수 218.3이 산출된 중생혼합림이 그 뒤를 이었으며, 소나무림형의 천이지수가 가장 낮았다. 산림형들의 천이지수와 종다양성지수와의 비례적인 관계는 찾기 어려웠다. 가정적으로, 천이지수가 높은 산림형은 극상림에 보다 가까이 근접한 것으로 사료된다. 그러나 추정된 천이지수는 천이 단계를 가늠하는 절대적인 기준으로 삼을 수는 없지만, 산림형들 간에 천이 계열 상의 위치를 비교 평가할 수 있는 참고자료의 역할을 할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barbour, M.G. and Billings, W.D. 1988. North American Terrestrial Vegetation. Cambridge University Press. pp. 434.
  2. Barbour, M.G., Burk, J.H., and Pitts, W.D. 1987. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. pp. 159-167.
  3. Braun, E.L. 1950. Deciduous Forest of Eastern North America. Blakiston, Philadelphia. pp. 596.
  4. Brower, J.E. and Zar, J.H. 1977. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Wm. C. Brown company publishers. Iowa, USA. pp. 194.
  5. Chung, S.H. 2015. The Classification of Forest Cover Types in Natural Forests of the Baekdudaegan, South Korea. Ph.D Dissertation, Department of Forest Management, Kangwon National University.
  6. Curtis, J.T. and Mcintosh, R.P. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairie forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecological Society of America 32(3): 476-498.
  7. Daubernmire, R. 1968. Plant Communities. Harper & Row. New York. pp. 300.
  8. European Environment Agency. 2006. European Forest Types; Categories and types for sustainable forest management reporting and policy. EEA Technical Report No 9/2006. pp. 111.
  9. Everitt. B. 1973. Cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA.
  10. Hartigan, J.A. 1975. Clustering algorithms. Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA.
  11. Horn H.S. 1971. The Adaptive Geometry of Trees. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 144.
  12. Kim, J.H. 1992. Analysis of successional trend by transition matrix model in the mixed broadleaved-Abies forest of Mt. Odae. The Journal of Korean Forest Society 82(4): 325-336.
  13. Kim, J.H. 1993. The Estimation of Climax Index for Broadleaved Tree Species by Analysis of Ecomorphological Properties. The Journal of Forest Science 82(2): 176-187.
  14. Kim, J.H. 2002. Community Ecological View of the Natural Deciduous Forest in Korea. pp. 93-104. In. D.W. Lee (ed), Ecology of Korea. Bumwoo Publ. Co., Seoul, Korea.
  15. Kim, J.H., Chung, S.H., and Lee, J.M. 2012. The Development of Climax Index by Analysis of Eco-morphological Characters for Major Decioduous Tree Species. The Journal of Forest Science 28(4): 199-204. https://doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2012.28.4.199
  16. Kim, J.H., Jin, G., and Chung, S.H. 2015. Stand development patterns of forest cover types in the natural forests of northern Baekdudaegan in South Korea, Journal of Forest Research, DOI 10.1007/s11676-015-0044-x (Published online).
  17. Kimmins, J.P. 2004. Forest ecology: A foundation for sustainable forest management and environmental ethics in forestry. 3rd edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey. pp. 611.
  18. Korea Forest Service. 2014. The Final Report, The Baekdudaegan Mountains Forest Biodiversity R&D Center, Kangwon National University. pp. 1147.
  19. Korean National Parks Authority. 2011. The Research of natural resources for Jirisan Korea National Park. Korea. pp. 146.
  20. Lee, H.S. 2011. The Estimation of Climax Index for Deciduous Tree Species by Ecomorphological Factors (in Korean). MS Thesis. Department of Forest Management, Graduate School, Kangwon National University, pp. 66.
  21. Lee, J.M., Hwang, K.M., and Kim, J.H. 2014. The Classification of Forest by Cluster analysis in the Natural Forest of the Southern Region of Baekdudaegan Mountatins. The Journal of Korean Forestry Society 103(1): 12-22. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.1.12
  22. Lee, K.J., Han, S.S., Kim, J.H., and Kim, Y.S. 1999. Forest Ecology. Hyangmoonsa, Korea. pp. 395.
  23. Lim, S.M. 2015. The Estimation of Succession Index for Forest Cover Types in the Natural Forest of Jirisan. Thesis, Mater of Agriculture. Department of Forest Management, Kangwon National University. pp. 65.
  24. Ludwig, J.A., and Reynolds, J.F. 1988. Statistical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA. pp. 125-144.
  25. Odum, E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3877.262
  26. Odum, E.P. and Barrett, G.W. 2005. Fundamentals of Ecology (5th ed.). Thomson Inc. pp. 598.
  27. Oliver, C.D. and B.C. Larson, 1996. Forest Stand Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 520.
  28. Orloci, L. 1967. An agglomerative methods for classification of plant communities. Journal of Ecology 55: 193-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2257725
  29. Shugart, H.H. 1984. A Theory of Forest Dynamics. The ecological Implication of Forest Succession Models. Springer-Verlag. New York. pp. 278.
  30. Suh, M.H. and Lee, D.K. 1998. Stand structure and regeneration of Quercus mongolica forest in Korea. Forest Ecology and Management 106: 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00236-3
  31. The Korean Association for Conservation of Nature. 1993. A Report on the Scientific Survey of the northern Part of Mt. Chiri (1992). The Report of the KACN, No. 31. pp. 240.
  32. Vankat J.L. 1979. The Natural Vegetation of North America. John Wiley & Sons. New York. pp. 261.
  33. Wells P.V. 1976. A climax index for broadlaf forest; an Ndimentional ecomorphological models of succession. Central Hardwood Conference Proceeding, pp. 131-176.
  34. West, D.C., Shugart, H.H., and Botkin, D.B. (ed.). 1981. Forest Succession; Concept and Application. Springer-Verlag. New York. pp. 517.
  35. Whittaker, R.H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystem. 2nd ed. Macmillan. New York. pp. 385.
  36. Willianson, M., K.H. Gaston, and W.M. Lonsdale. 2001. The species-area relationship does not have an asymptote!. Journal of Biogeography 28: 827-830.
  37. Yang, H.M., Kang. S.K., and Kim. J.H. 2001. Selection of desirable species and estimation of composition ratio in a natural deciduous forest. The Journal of Korean Forestry Society 90: 465-475.

Cited by

  1. Community Ecological Revaluation of Acer pseudosieboldianum and Carpinus cordata in the Natural Deciduous Forest vol.32, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7747/JFES.2016.32.1.74
  2. 노을공원 쓰레기매립지 식생복원을 위한 아까시나무 천이방향 연구 vol.24, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2021.24.3.19