디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제13권9호
  • /
  • Pages.21-28
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정부기관의 정치 불신에 관한 실태분석

Analysis on Political Distrust of Governmental Agencies

  • Kim, Yong-Chul (Dept. of Public Administration, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.11
  • 심사 : 2015.09.20
  • 발행 : 2015.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문에서는 미국, 일본, 한국의 3개국을 중심으로 정치 불신의 실태분석에 그 목적을 두고 있다. 2008년 세계가치관조사에 의하면 3개 국가의 정치불신은 국민의식 수준을 기준으로 할 때 70%를 상회하고 있다. 특히 한국의 경우 우리나라는 미국, 일본과 비교해 볼 때 극단적 불신계층을 보면 의회와 정당에 대해 가장 높은 불신비율을 보이고 있다. 이는 정당과 의회의 미흡한 정치서비스 수준에 대해 국민의 불평행위를 해소할 수 있는 정치 메커니즘을 갖추고 있지 않다는 것을 시사한다. 그래서 결과적으로 정치불평 행태채널은 정치 메카니즘 내부에 더 존재할 수 있도록 만들어져야 할 것이다. 또한 이제까지 한국의 정당들은 사회발전과 국민통합의 역할을 수행하지 못하고 사회에 오히려 부정적 영향을 미쳤던 것이 사실이며 이러한 것도 장래 개선되어야 할 것이다. 이러한 정치불신은 민주주의를 저해하는 가장 큰 요인이므로 이를 개선해 나가기 위한 국민적 합의가 필요하다.

This study shows what the political distrust of three nations was preserved among US, Japan, and South Korea in 2008. According to the World Value Survey research, the political distrust of three nations was reached over 70% when on the basis of national people's consciousness in 2008. Especially in the case of South Korea, the percentage of extreme distrust was the highest compared to the other countries. The reason why South Korea could not manage the nation people's political voice to the government and National Assembly. So consequently political complaining behavior channel should be erected more in the political mechanism. And Korean political parties could not manage the social development and national consolidation. Moreover, attacted the negative effects to society. Political distrust is the worst obstacle in democracy that it will be needed the national consensus to amend it.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kramer, Roderick M. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspective, Enduring Questions, Annual Review of Psychology, 59. 1999.
  2. Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddeness, The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3) : p.p.481-510.1985 https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
  3. Miller, A.M. Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970, The American Political Science Review, 68(3) : p.p. 951-972. 1974 https://doi.org/10.2307/1959140
  4. Zucker, L.G. Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure 1840-1920, In B.M Staw and L.L Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior , 8 : p.p. 53-111, 1986.
  5. Mckinght, H.C & C.Kaerner Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce, Information System Research, 13 : p.p 217-230, 2002.
  6. Putnam, R.D. The Prosperous Community : Social Capital and Public Life, The American Prospect, 13:35-42, 1993.
  7. Choi, Sung Hak, A Study On Effectiveness and Results of Governmental Trust, The Journal of Korean Policy Studies, 21, 2010.
  8. Mowen, John C. Consumer Behavior and ed., New York : MacMillan Publishing Company, 1990.
  9. Singh J. & R. Howell, Consumer Complaining Behavior: A Review and Prospectus, Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 1: p.p. 41-49, 1985.
  10. Barnes S. H. & M. Kasse et. al. Political Action: Mass Participation in five Western Democracy, Beverly Hills : Sage Publications, 1979.
  11. Yang Gun-Mo & Park Tong-Hee, What the Effect to the MOHW When Doctors & Pharmacists can Participate the Policy Process, The Journal of Public Administration Studies, 41(4) : p.p 357-385, 2007.
  12. Han Sung Youl, Psychological Research on Trust and Distrust of Korea, Jounal of Psychological Research,11,2005.
  13. Easton D. A Re-Assessment of the Concept ofPolitical Support,British Journal of Political Science,5:pp.435-457.1975 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008309
  14. Choi Jun Young, Causes and Effects of Trust Change, Congress Research,15(1).2009
  15. Coleman J.S .Foundation of Social Theory, Cambridge :Harvard University Press,1990.
  16. Parry G. Trust,Distrust,Consensus,British Journal of Political Science, 6, 1976.