Competition and Cooperation Dynamics between Gwangyang Port and Major Container Ports in Northeast Asia

광양항과 동북아 주요 컨테이너항만간 경협 추세분석

  • Received : 2015.06.06
  • Accepted : 2015.06.28
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

This study formulates a development strategy for Gwangyang port through the analysis of its competition with other major Northeast Asian ports. A revised BCG matrix is applied to estimate the change in competition between the major ports in Northeast Asia and the Lotka-Volterra model is used for the competitor analysis. The growing competitive power and influence of Chinese ports, continued competitive advantage of Busan port, diminishing competitiveness of Gwangyang and Incheon ports, and disappearing competitive position of Japanese ports in Northeast Asia are all confirmed. In addition, according to the relationship between Gwangyang port and other major Northeast Asian ports from 2007 to 2014, Gwangyang port has changed to a predatory from a win/win relation with Busan port and has maintained its predatory relationship with Hong Kong port in terms of transshipment cargoes. Moreover, Gwangyang port has formed predatory relationships with Shanghai and Ningbo ports, a pure competitive relation with Tianjin port, and a win/win relation with Qingdao and Dalian ports. Overall, predatory relationships between Gwangyang port and other Northeast Asia ports increased from 2007 to 2014. The counterstrategies for Gwangyang port to address this situation include establishing cooperative relations and continuing the win/win relationships with cooperative ports.

본 논문의 목적은 동북아항만간 경쟁 입지변화와 경쟁관계 분석을 통해 광양항의 발전전략을 구축하는 것이다. 동북아 주요항만간 경쟁 입지 변화추정을 위해 수정 BCG매트릭스, 그리고 경쟁관계분석을 위해 Lotka-Volterra모형을 활용하였다. 연구결과 동북아지역에서는 중국항만의 경쟁력 및 영향력 확대, 부산항의 경쟁력 유지와 광양항 및 인천항의 경쟁력 정체, 그리고 일본항만의 경쟁력 실종을 확인했다. 또한 2007년 대비 2014년의 동북아 항만과 광양항간 관계에 따르면 환적물량기준 광양항은 부산항과 윈윈관계에서 약탈적 관계로 변화되었으며, 홍콩항과는 약탈적 관계를 유지하였다. 또한 상하이 및 닝보와는 약탈적 관계, 톈진과 순수경쟁관계, 그리고 칭다오 및 다롄과 윈윈관계를 형성하고 있다. 전체적으로 2007년 대비 2014년에는 광양항과 동북아 항만들간에 약탈적관계로 변화된 항만이 늘어나고 있다. 이에 대한 광양항의 대응전략은 약탈적 및 경쟁 관계의 항만들과는 협력적관계로, 그리고 윈윈 협력관계의 항만들과는 윈윈관계를 지속하는 전략을 구사할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김근섭.곽규석(2008), "동북아지역 항만간 경쟁에서 부산항의 포지셔닝 분석", "한국항해항만학회지", 제32권 제3호, 173-178. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2008.32.3.173
  2. 박병인(2015), "광양항과 동북아시아간 주요 컨테이너 항만간 경험추세 분석", "한국해운물류학회 2015년 춘계정기학술대회 발표논문집", 순천대학교, 2015. 4.24.
  3. 박용안.최기영(2013), "부산항과 고베항의 거점기능을 둘러싼 경쟁과 협력관계 분석", "해양정책연구", 제27권 제2호, 93-131.
  4. 여기태(2007), "퍼지이론을 도입한 동북아 항만물류 거점 간 경쟁 및 협력현상의 구조분석에 관한 연구", "물류학회지", 제17권 제2호, 137-152.
  5. 이병철.김윤배(2011), "동북아시아 환적물동량 예측모델 연구", "산업공학", 제37권 제4호, 297-303.
  6. 이지훈.김율성.신창훈(2009), "국내 컨테이너항만의 경쟁구조에 관한 연구", "한국항해항만학회지", 제33권 제1호, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2009.33.1.091
  7. 한철환(2002), "Strategic Positioning Analysis on the Asian Container Ports", "한국해운학회지", 제34호, 99-115.
  8. Chiang, S. -Y.(2012), "An application of Lotka-Volterra model to Taiwan's transition from 200 mm to 300 mm silicon wafers," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol.,79 No.2, 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.05.007
  9. Containerisation International Yearbook, 각년호.
  10. De Lombaerde, P. and Verbeke, A.(1989), "Assessing International Seaport Competition: A Tool for Strategic Decision Making," International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol.16 No.2, 175-192.
  11. Hwang, I,-Y. and Park, J. H.(2014), "Competitive Diffusion of Nuclear and Nonnuclear Energy in Korea," The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, Vol.29 No.2, 1-20.
  12. Lee, S,-J., Lee, D,-J. and Oh, H,-S.(2005), "Technological forecasting at the Korean stock market: A dynamic competition analysis using Lotka-Volterra model," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol.72 No.8, 1044-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2002.11.001
  13. Leslie, P. H.(1957), "A stochastic model for studying the properties of certain biological systems by numerical methods," Biometrika, Vol. 45 No.1, 16-31.
  14. Li, J. and Oh, Y.(2010), "A Research on Competition and Cooperation Between Shanghai Port and Ningbo-Zhoushan Port," The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol.26 No.1, 67-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2092-5212(10)80012-4
  15. Modis, T.(1999), "Technological forecasting at the stock market," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol.62 No.3, 173-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00046-3
  16. Notteboom, T. E.(1997), "Concentration and Load Centre Development the European Container Port System," Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.5 No.2, 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(96)00072-5
  17. Teurelincx, D.(2000), "Functional Analysis of Port Performance as a Strategic Tool for Strengthening a Port's Competitive and Economic Potential," International Journal of Maritime Economics, Vol.2 No.2, 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1057/ijme.2000.11
  18. Tsai, B. H. and Li, Y.(2009), "Cluster Evolution of IC industry from Taiwan to China," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 76 No.8, 1092-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.006
  19. Yap, W. Y. and Lam, J. S. L.(2006), "Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia," Transportation Research Part A, Vol.40, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2005.01.003
  20. Zhang, W. and Lam, J. S. L.(2013), "Maritime Cluster Evolution Based on Symbiosis Theory and Lotka-Volterra Model," Maritime Policy & Management, Vol.40 No.2, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.757375