DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Benzene Exposure Matrices Using Employees's Exposure Assessment Data

작업환경측정 결과를 활용한 벤젠 노출 매트릭스에 대한 연구

  • Baek, Kyunghee (Department of Biochemistry and Health Science, Changwon National University) ;
  • Park, Donguk (Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University) ;
  • Ha, Kwonchul (Department of Biochemistry and Health Science, Changwon National University)
  • 백경희 (창원대학교 보건의과학과) ;
  • 박동욱 (한국방송통신대학교 환경보건학과) ;
  • 하권철 (창원대학교 보건의과학과)
  • Received : 2015.05.26
  • Accepted : 2015.06.21
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were to set up benzene exposure matrices according to industry and process and to assess the risk of those occupational exposure to benzene. Methods: The benzene exposure matrices were assembled depending on industry and process, based on an exposure database provided by KOSHA(the Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency), which was gathered from a workplace hazards evaluation program in Korea. These exposure matrices were assessed by Hallmark Risk Assessment tool. Results: The benzene was treated 412 industries sector(36%), 2,747 business places, and 471 industrial processes according to database. The arithmetic mean of past decade 8 hours time-weighted average of airborne benzene concentrations in the workplace was 0.10722 ppm. 1.07% of the total sample were greater than OEL, and 59.8% were showed less than the limit of detection. The highest risk values(Danger Value) were seen 36 industries including manufacture of general paints and similar product and 12 processes, such as other painting of manufacture of metal fabricated members. Exposure matrices based on employee exposure data base may provide exposure histories and can be used in epidemiological studies. Conclusions: It was found that more attentions should be paid to 36 among 412 industries and 12 of 471 processes, with a higher risk value.

Keywords

References

  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological profile for benzene, 2007
  2. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), 2015 TLVs & BEIs, Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices, ISBN 978-1-607260-77-6; 2015
  3. American Industrial Hygiene Association(AIHA): Guidance for conducting control banding analyses, 2007
  4. An SC, Kang JW, Kim, H. Effects of benzene exposure on genetic damage of human white blood cells. Cungbuk Med J, 2003;13(2):189-204
  5. Cha CH, Kim KJ, Kim JC, Paik NW. Development of Technology for Environmental Assessment and Biological Monitoring of Workers Exposed to Benzene. The Kor J of Occup Med, 1994;6(1):35-39
  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC). Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Vol. 1-109, 2013
  7. Kim EA. Occupational Disease Epidemiology Study 21 - Benzene Exposed Workers 2000s. Korean Industrial Health Association. 2011
  8. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency(KOSHA), Application of Matrix and Risk Assessment of Industries, Processes, and Job, Research Report, 2008
  9. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Exposure limits for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents (MoEL Public Notice No. 2013-38). 2013
  10. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Toxic and Hazardous Substances. Standard No. 1910.1028. OSHA, Retrieved on 2015-5-18
  11. Ott MG, Norwood SK, Cook RR. The collection and management of occupational exposure data. Am Statist 1985;39:432-436
  12. Pukkla, E., Guo, J., Kyyronen, P., Lindbohm, M. L., Sallmem, M. and Kauppinen, T. : National jobexposure matrics in analysis of census-basedestimates of occupational cancer risk. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environmental Health 2005;31(2):97-107 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.856
  13. Rajan B, Alesbury B, Carton M, Gerin H. European prposal for core information for the storage and exchange of workplace exposure measurements on chemical agents. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1997;12(1):31-39 https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1997.10389453
  14. Rosenstock L, Cullen MR, Brodkin CA, Redlich CA. Textbook of clinical occupational and environmental medicine. 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia. 2005
  15. Statistics Korea, Korean Standard Industrial Classification (KSIC), 9th revision, 2008