Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing fragility curves and loss functions for masonry infill walls

  • Received : 2015.02.09
  • Accepted : 2015.05.30
  • Published : 2015.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to summarize results from previous experimental tests on laboratory specimens of RC/steel frames with masonry infills, in order to develop fragility functions that permit the estimation of damage in typical non-structural components of RC frame buildings, as a function of attained peak interstory drift. The secondary objective is to derive loss functions for such non-structural components, which provide information on the probability of experiencing a certain level of monetary loss when a given damage state is attained. Fragility curves and loss function developed in this study can be directly used within the FEMA P-58 framework for the seismic performance assessment of RC frame buildings with masonry infills.

Keywords

References

  1. Angel, R., Abrams, D., Shapiro, D., Uzarski, J. and Webster M. (1994), "Behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills", Civil Engineering Studies, Structural Research Series N. 589, UILU-ENG-942005, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
  2. ATC - Applied Technology Council (2012a), FEMA P-58 Next-generation Seismic Performance Assessment for Buildings, Volume 1 - Methodology, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  3. ATC - Applied Technology Council (2012b), FEMA P-58 Next-generation Seismic Performance Assessment for Buildings, Volume 2 - Implementation Guide, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  4. BUR (Official Journal of Regione Basilicata) (2013), Price List of Public Works in Basilicata Region, Potenza. (in Italian)
  5. Bozorgnia, Y. and Bertero, V.V. (2004), Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering, CRC Press.
  6. Calvi, G.M., Bolognini, D. and Penna, A. (2004), "Seismic performance of masonry-infilled R.C. frames: benefits of slight reinforcements", Sismica 2004, Congreso National de Sismologia e Engenharia Sismica, Guimaraes, Portugal.
  7. Carydis, P.G., Mouzakis, H.P., Taflambas, J.M. and Vougioukas, E.A. (1992), "Response of infilled frames with brick walls to earthquake motions", Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid.
  8. Carvalho, E.C. and Coelho, E. (2001), "Seismic assessment, strengthening and repair of structures", ECOEST2-ICONS report n. 2, European Commission - Training and Mobility of Researchers Program.
  9. Colangelo, F (2003), "Experimental evaluation of Member-by-Member models and damage indices for infilled frames", J. Earthq. Eng., 7(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460309350440
  10. Dolsek, M. and Fajfar, P. (2008), "The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame-a deterministic assessment", Eng. Struct., 30(7), 1991-2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.001
  11. Hak, S., Morandi, P., Magenes, G. and Sullivan, T.J. (2012), "Damage control for clay masonry infills in the design of RC frame structures", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.594485
  12. Kakaletsis, D.J. and Karayannis, C.G. (2008), "Influence of masonry strength and openings on infilled R/C frames under cyclic loading", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(2), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701299138
  13. Kappos, A.J., Stylianidis, K.C. and Michailidis, C.N. (1998), "Analytical models for brick masonry infilled r/c frames under lateral loading", J. Earthq. Eng., 2(1), 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469809350314
  14. Lilliefors, H. (1967), "On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown", J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 62(318), 399-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916
  15. Manos, G.C., Triamataki, M. and Yasin, B. (1995), "Experimental and numerical simulation of the influence of masonry infills on the seismic response of reinforced concrete framed structures", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Eds. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 3, 1513-1518.
  16. Mehrabi, A.B., Shing, P.B., Schuller, M.P. and Noland, J.L. (1996), "Experimental evaluation of masonry infilled RC frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 122(3), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(228)
  17. Mosalam, K.M., White, R.N. and Gergely, P. (1997), "Static response of infilled frames using quasi-static experimentation", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 123(11), 228-237.
  18. Negro, P. and Verzeletti, G. (1996), "Effect of infills on the global behavior of R/C frames: Energy considerations from pseudodynamic tests", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(8), 753-773. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199608)25:8<753::AID-EQE578>3.0.CO;2-Q
  19. Paulo Pereira, M.F., Neto Pereira, M.F., Dias Ferreira, J.E. and Lourenco, P.B. (2011), "Behavior of masonry infill panels in RC frames subjected to in plane and out of plane loads", Proceedings of the 7th Amcm International Conference, Krakow, Poland.
  20. Pires, F. and Carvalho, E.C. (1992), "The behaviour of infilled reinforced concrete frames under horizontal cyclic loading", Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid.
  21. Pujol, S., Benavent-Climent, A., Rodriguez, M.E. and Smith-Pardo, J.P. (2008), "Masonry infill walls: An effective alternative for seismic strengthening of low-rise Reinforced Concrete building structures", The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
  22. Ross, S.M. (2003), "Peirce's criterion for the elimination of suspect experimental data", J. Eng. Technol., 20(2), 38-41.
  23. Sigmund, V. and Penava, D. (2012), "Experimental study of masonry infilled R/C frames with opening", Proceedings of the 15WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal.
  24. Schneider, S.P., Zagers, B.R. and Abrams, D.P. (1998), "Lateral strength of steel frames with masonry infills having large opening", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 124(8), 896-904. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(896)
  25. Sucuoglu, H. (2013), "Implications of masonry infill and partition Damage in performance perception in residential buildings after a moderate earthquake", Earthq. Spectra, 29(2), 661-667. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000147
  26. Tasnimi, A.A. and Mohebkhah, A. (2011), "Investigation on the behavior of brick-infilled steel frames with openings, experimental and analytical approaches", Eng. Struct., 33(3), 968-980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.018
  27. Zarnic, R. (1995), "Modelling of response of masonry infilled frames", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Eds. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 3, 14811486.
  28. Zarnic, R. and Gostic, S. (1997), "Masonry infilled frames as an effective structural sub assemblage", Proceedings of the International Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the next generation of codes, Bled, Slovenia.
  29. Zarnic, R. and Tomazevic, M. (1984), "The behaviour of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames subjected to cyclic lateral loading", Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

Cited by

  1. Fragility functions for masonry infill walls with in-plane loading vol.46, pp.15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2934
  2. Simplified estimation of the expected annual loss of reinforced concrete buildings 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2893
  3. Seismic retrofit options for non-structural building partition walls: Impact on loss estimation and cost-benefit analysis vol.161, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.028
  4. Damage and Loss Assessment of Pre-70 RC Frame Buildings with FEMA P-58 vol.21, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1149893
  5. Estimating fragility curves of pre-70 RC frame buildings considering different performance limit states 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.015
  6. Multiple inelastic mechanisms analysis (MIMA): A simplified method for the estimation of the seismic response of RC frame buildings vol.145, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.026
  7. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Alternative Retrofit Strategies for RC Frame Buildings 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1323041
  8. Fragility curves and loss functions for RC structural components with smooth rebars vol.10, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1181
  9. Probabilistic seismic assessment and retrofit considerations for Italian RC frame buildings 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0257-9
  10. Repair Costs of Existing RC Buildings Damaged by the L'Aquila Earthquake and Comparison with FEMA P-58 Predictions vol.34, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1193/122916EQS257M
  11. Modeling and Seismic Response Analysis of Italian Code-Conforming Reinforced Concrete Buildings pp.1559-808X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1527733
  12. An Optimized Procedure to Estimate the Economic Seismic Losses of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings due to Seismic Damage vol.8, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8100144
  13. Empirical drift-fragility functions and loss estimation for infills in reinforced concrete frames under seismic loading pp.1573-1456, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0501-y
  14. Macromodeling of in- and out-of-plane behavior of unreinforced masonry infill walls pp.1573-1456, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0458-x
  15. Collapse limit state definition for seismic assessment of code-conforming RC buildings vol.10, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-018-0200-6
  16. Seismic assessment and loss estimation of existing school buildings in Italy vol.168, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.056
  17. In-plane behaviour and damage assessment of masonry infills with hollow clay bricks in RC frames vol.168, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.065
  18. Evaluation of Repair Costs for Masonry Infills in RC Buildings from Observed Damage Data: the Case-Study of the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake vol.9, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9050122
  19. Recent Findings and Open Issues concerning the Seismic Behaviour of Masonry Infill Walls in RC Buildings vol.2020, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9261716
  20. Seismic Loss Estimation in Pre-1970 Residential RC Buildings: The Role of Infills and Services in Low-Mid-Rise Case Studies vol.6, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.589230
  21. Repair costs of reinforced concrete building components: from actual data analysis to calibrated consequence functions vol.36, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878194
  22. Displacement-Based Simplified Seismic Loss Assessment of Pre-70S RC Buildings vol.24, pp.suppl1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1716890
  23. Displacement-Based Simplified Seismic Loss Assessment of Masonry Buildings vol.24, pp.suppl1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1755747
  24. Optimal structural restoration of historic building in Japan considering lifecycle seismic loss analysis vol.3, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12151
  25. A database of test results from steel and reinforced concrete infilled frame experiments vol.36, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899950
  26. A rational approach to the conversion of FEMA P-58 seismic repair costs to Europe vol.36, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899964
  27. Performance-Based Design through Implementation of FEMA P-58 Methodology in Developing Countries vol.9, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2020.93015
  28. Advanced Techniques for Pilotis RC Frames Seismic Retrofit: Performance Comparison for a Strategic Building Case Study vol.10, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10090149
  29. In-plane and out-of-plane seismic damage of masonry infills in existing r.c. structures: the case study of De Gasperi-Battaglia school in Norcia vol.19, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00981-2
  30. Seismic retrofit solutions using base isolation for existing RC buildings: economic feasibilty and pay-back time vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00988-9
  31. Seismic demand model class uncertainty in seismic loss analysis for a code-designed URM infilled RC frame building vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00994-x
  32. Fragility Assessment of Beam-Slab Connections for Informing Earthquake-Induced Repairs in Composite-Steel Moment Resisting Frames vol.7, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.691553
  33. Comparison of traditional vs low-damage structural and non-structural building systems through a cost/performance-based evaluation vol.37, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020952445
  34. Integrated economic and environmental building classification and optimal seismic vulnerability/energy efficiency retrofitting vol.19, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01101-4
  35. Characterization of local and global capacity criteria for collapse assessment of code-conforming RC buildings vol.19, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01115-y
  36. The use of satellite data to support the structural health monitoring in areas affected by slow-moving landslides: a potential application to reinforced concrete buildings vol.20, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720983232
  37. Story loss functions for seismic design and assessment: Development of tools and application vol.37, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211023523
  38. Seismic performance and fragility analysis of infilled steel frame structures using a new multi-strut model vol.34, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.015
  39. Seismic lateral deformations demand in conceptual design of reinforced concrete framed structures vol.45, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103565