한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제35권3호
  • /
  • Pages.395-402
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학생, 교사 및 학부모의 과학 창의성에 대한 대립적 관점 조사

Investigating Students, Teachers, and Parents' Recognition of Contrary Views on Scientific Creativity

  • 투고 : 2015.04.10
  • 심사 : 2015.06.22
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 과학 창의성에 대한 인식이 교사와 학부모, 학생들 간에 다를 수 있고, 이러한 관점의 차이는 실제 과학 창의성을 지도하고 격려하는데, 또 계발하는데 영향을 준다고 보았다. 이에 과학 창의성의 특성에 대한 교사들의 자유응답과 문헌조사를 바탕으로, 과학 창의성에 대한 대립적 관점 16개 항목을 추출한 후, 초중등 학생, 예비교사(사범대학생), 초중등 교사, 학부모 652명을 대상으로 16개 항목에 각각 동의하는 정도를 설문조사하였다. 조사결과, 모든 항목에서 대상자의 1/4 이상이 기존의 문헌에서 나타나는 과학 창의성에 대한 관점과 다른 관점을 가지고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또 기존의 관점과 다른 관점을 가진 대상자가 특별히 많은 경우가 무엇인지 알 수 있었고, 대상자들 간에도 서로 대립되는 관점을 가진 두 그룹으로 나누어지는 항목들이 무엇인지 알 수 있었다. 이로부터 대상자들의 관점이 과학 창의성의 지도와 격려 및 계발에 미칠 수 있는 영향에 대해서 논의하고, 앞으로 필요한 연구를 제안하였다.

This study assumes that recognition about scientific creativity may differ according to teacher, students and parents, and that this difference can affect the actual teaching, encouragement, and development of scientific creativity. Based on teacher's free responses and literature reviews about features of scientific creativity, we extracted 16 items describing contrary views about scientific creativity. Using these 16 items, we obtain responses from 652 students, teachers, soon-to-be-teachers (college of education students) and parents about whether they agree with each item or not. Results show that 1/4 of the participants agreed with the views contrary to the views accepted in literature. And we found out which views contrary to the accepted views in literature were agreed upon by participants, and that which items divided the groups for having contrary views. From these results, we discuss the possible effects of participants' recognition on teaching, encouragement and development of scientific creativity, and suggest so further studies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andiliou, A., & Murphy, P.K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers' and teachers' conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.003
  2. Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative justice? The relationship between prospective teachers' prior schooling experiences and perceived importance of promoting student creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(3), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01270.x
  3. Bolandifar, S., & Noordin, N. (2013). Investigating the relationship between creativity and academic achievement of Malaysian undergraduates. Journal Teknologi (Social Sciences), 65(2), 101-107.
  4. Cropley, A.J. (1997). More Ways Than One: Fostering Creativity. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  5. Diakidoy, I.-A., & Kanari, E. (1999). Student teachers' beliefs about creativity. British Educational Research Journal, 25(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250206
  6. Esquivel, G.B. (1995). Teacher behaviors that foster creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212493
  7. Feldhusen, J.F., & Clinkenbeard, P.R. (1986). Creativity instructional materials: A review of research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(3), 153-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00435.x
  8. Fryer, M., & Collings, J.A. (1991). British teachers' view of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(1), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1991.tb01356.x
  9. Hong, M., & Kang, N-H. (2010). South Korean and the US secondary school science teachers' conceptions of creativity and teaching for creativity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(5), 821-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9188-5
  10. Jeon, K.-W. (2000). Creology. Seoul: HakMunSa.
  11. Kaufman. J. (2009). Creativity 101. NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  12. Kampulis, P., Berki, E., & Saariluoma, P. (2009). In-service and prospective teachers' conceptions of creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.10.001
  13. Kwang, N.A., & Smith, I. (2004). The paradox of promoting creativity in the Asian classroom: An empirical investigation. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130(4), 307-330. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.130.4.307-332
  14. Lee, E.A., & Seo, H-A. (2006). Understanding of creativity by Korean elementary teachers in gifted education. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1802_9
  15. Lubart, T.I. (2000-2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3 & 4), 295-308.
  16. Mansfield, R.S., & Busse, T.V. (1981). The Psychology of Creativity: Scientists and Their Work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  17. Nellist, J., & Nicholee, B. (1986). ASE Science Teachers' Handbook. London: Hutchinson.
  18. Olatoye, R.A., Akintunde, S.O., & Yakasi, M.I. (2010). Emotional intelligence, creativity and academic achievement of business administration students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(2), 763-786.
  19. Park, J. (2004). A suggestion of cognitive model of scientific creativity (CMSC). Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 375-386.
  20. Park, J., & Kim, J. (2013). Development and analysis of various activity types for teaching scientific creativity. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.310
  21. Park, S., Lee, S-Y., Oliver, J. S., & Cramond, B. (2006). Changes in Korean science teachers' perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9009-4
  22. Plucker, J.A. (2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01228.x
  23. Powers, D.E., & Kaufman, C.K. (2004). Do standardized tests penalize deep-thinking, creative, or conscientious students? Some personality correlates of Graduate Record Examinations test scores. Intelligence, 32(2), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2003.08.003
  24. Raina, M.K. (1975). Parental perception about ideal child: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37(1), 229-232. https://doi.org/10.2307/351047
  25. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
  26. Runco, M.A. (2014). Creativity. Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice (2nd ed.), London: Elsevier.
  27. Runco, M.A., & Johnson, D.J. (2002). Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3 & 4), 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_12
  28. Sen, A.K., & Hagtvet, K.A. (1993). Correlation among creativity, intelligence, personality, and academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 497-498. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.2.497
  29. Simonton, D.K. (2004). Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Wang, C.W., & Horng, R.Y. (2002). The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance. R&D Management, 32(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00237
  31. Weisberg, R.W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

피인용 문헌

  1. 수학 창의성에 대한 초등수학영재들의 인식 연구 vol.26, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2016.26.4.747
  2. 고등학생을 위한 생물 창의성 검사 도구 개발 vol.45, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.1.92
  3. 중학교 과학영재들의 과학 창의성 평가 사례 연구 vol.45, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.4.536