DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Issues Related to Self-Directed Learning Screening(SDLS) in Science Specialized High School

과학고 자기주도학습전형 쟁점 연구

  • Received : 2015.03.03
  • Accepted : 2015.05.11
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

This study is to discover the diverse issues related to Self-Directed Learning Screening (SDLS) and draw implications by analyzing its critical points. Using content analysis and interviews with admission officers, tentative issues were finalized and reviewed by researchers and educators. A Survey was developed based on the 96 issues after having evidence of content validity using the Delphi method. To conduct survey, e-mails were sent to admissions officers in twenty science specialized high schools. They were asked to response to questions about perceptions of critical issues and if there are any issues in their schools. Using mean scores of two factors based on its critical issues and frequencies, a two-dimensional classification table for each type was presented. Four critical issues for each type were discovered. The first type indicates minor issues that include 28 items that were less than the overall mean scores in terms of critical issues and its frequencies. The second type indicates tentative issues that include 29 items that were greater than the mean score in critical issues but less in its frequencies. The third type indicates general issues that include 17 items that were less than the mean score in critical issues but greater in its frequencies. The last type indicates critical issues that include 22 items that were greater than the mean scores in two factors. The discovered results of critical issues and its types in this study can be considered a core part of the screening process in schools, especially, critical issues should play an important role in the process of admission screening planning.

본 연구는 과학고 자기주도학습전형에서의 쟁점항목을 탐색하고 이에 대한 중요도를 분석하여 자기주도학습전형 진행의 시사점을 도출하는 것을 목적으로 수행되었다. 이를 위해서 문헌조사와 과학고 입학담당관(혹은 입학사정관) 면담 등을 통해 예비-잠정쟁점사항을 추출한 후 교육전문가 및 현장전문가의 검토를 받았다. 그리고 전형전문가 델파이 조사를 거쳐서 내용타당도를 검정한 후 쟁점항목 96개를 도출하여 설문도구를 개발하였다. 이를 바탕으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문조사는 20개 과학고의 입학담당관들을 대상으로 이메일을 이용하였다. 설문의 내용은 개별 쟁점항목에 대하여 입학담당관들의 인식의 중요도와 개별 학교에서의 발생유무였다. 수집된 자료들에 대한 쟁점항목 중요도와 발생 빈도수를 통계 처리하여 두 요인의 평균값을 기준으로 상하로 구분한 후 2차원 분류표에 유형별로 배치하였다. 이 과정에서 도출된 4가지의 유형별 쟁점은 다음과 같다. 첫 번째 유형은 개별 쟁점들의 중요도와 발생빈도수에 대한평균이 전체의 평균보다 모두 낮은 28개의 항목으로 이들은 경미한 쟁점에 해당한다. 두 번째 유형은 전체 평균보다 개별 쟁점의 중요도 평균은 높지만 발생빈도수 평균은 낮은 29개 항목의 잠재적 쟁점이다. 세 번째는 평이한 쟁점으로 이것은 두 요인에 대한 전체 평균에 비해 개별 쟁점의 중요도 평균은 낮지만 발생빈도수는 높은 17개 항목이다. 마지막으로 주요 쟁점이다. 이것은 두 요인에 대한 개별 쟁점항목들의 평균이 전체 평균보다 모두 높은 22개의 항목이다. 본 연구결과로 도출된 자기주도학습전형 쟁점항목들의 종류와 유형들은 이 전형을 실시하는 학교에서 전형현장에서 활용될 수 있을 것으로 보며, 특히 주요 쟁점에 대해서는 전형계획 수립 과정에서 적극 고려되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chase, W. Howard(1977). Public Issue Management : The New Science. Public Relations Journal, 33.
  2. Choe, H., Koo, G., Kim, G., Kim. C.,Park, C., Byun, J., Son, J., An, J., Lee, J., Jung,H., Jin, S.(2012). 2011. the 3rd year Report, Kyungnam: Development Center for Science Specialized Schools.
  3. Choe, H., Son, J., Jung, H.(2010). Self-Directed Learning Screening by Admission Officer in Science Specialized High Schools. Development Center for Science Specialized Schools, Development Center for Science Specialized Schools. pp. 24-25.
  4. Jones, B. L. and W. H. Chase.(1979). Managing Public Issues. Public Relations Review 5, Summer.
  5. H. Kang, J(2012). A Result of Meta Evaluation for Self-Directed Learning Screening in Science High School. KAIST Global Institute For Talented EDucation(KAIST GIFTED). pp. 6-13.
  6. Jung, J.(2005). American universities' ways of selecting the students and the analysis of their implications. Journal of Education Evaluation, 18(2), 149-171.
  7. Jung, Y.(2013). A Study of Critical Issue and Solution Processes in the Admission System so called Self Directed Learning Screening of Science Specialized High Schools. Department of Education. Graduate School, Kyungnam University, doctorial thesis.
  8. Kim, J.,Park, S., Shin, H., Min, B.(2013). Evaluating Admission Officer System Based on College Students' Outcomes. Asian Journal of Education, 14(1), 29-50.
  9. Kim, B., Kim, J., Oh, B.(2010). A Study on Improvement Plan of Settlement of Selection Examination Time of High School. Daegu: Yeungnam University.
  10. Kim, C.(2011). Understanding of Admission Officer System. Seoul: KyoWoo Publication Co.
  11. Kim, G.(2001). Company overcoming a crisis, Corporation disrupting for crisis, Seoul: Hyohyung Publication Co.
  12. Kim, W.(2006). Issue Management Campaign. Part, K. et al.. PR Campaign. Seoul: HanulAcademy Publication Co.
  13. Korean Council for University Education(KCUE)(2010). The Non-governmental Governing Operating System of Admission Officer System in University.
  14. Lawshe, C. H.(1975). A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity, Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  15. Lee, G.,Jung, H.,Kang, J., Kim, M.(2012). Supported Project for Admission of Science High School and Science-Gifted School. Daejeon: KAIST Global Institute For Talented EDucation(KAIST GIFTED)
  16. Lee, H.(2007). A Study on Environment Issue Class Using Decision Matrix Model. Korean National University of Education master-degree thesis.
  17. Lippitt(1982). Managing conflict in today's organizations. Training and Development Journal, 67-74.
  18. Ministry of Education(2013). Proper Understanding for Self-Directed Learning Screening.
  19. Ministry of Education(2014). Proper Understanding for Self-Directed Learning Screening.
  20. Moore, H. F., & Kalupa, F. B.(1985). Public Relations : Principles, Cases and Problems(9th ed)., Homewood, IL.: R.D. Irwin.
  21. Park, H., Kim, H., Kim, M., Park, J., Hwang, J.(2011). A Study on Stabilization of Self-Directed Learning Screening System. Korean Educational Development Institute, 33-35.
  22. Shin, H., Lee, D.(2002). Administration PR principle : Theory and Strategy. Seoul: Ewha Womans University Press.