Korean Journal of Child Studies (아동학회지)

Korean Association of Child Studies (한국아동학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploration into the Process of Scientific Thinking on the part of Young Children as seen through Constructive Play : Focusing on the Cases of the Jaemi Class

구성놀이에서 드러나는 유아들의 과학적 사고과정 탐색 : 재미반의 사례를 중심으로

  • 백은영 (숭의여자대학교 유아교육과)
  • Received : 2015.03.31
  • Accepted : 2015.06.05
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the process of scientific thinking as it is revealed through the cases of constructive play for young children. For this purpose, the researcher observed and interviewed six four-year-olds in the Jaemi Class while recording them with a camcorder during a free choice activity class in the morning from April 23 to June 25, 2012. The observations were analyzed in chronological order according to the changes of theories and structure as presented by the children themselves. The process of scientific thinking in constructive play for young children can be divided into presentation of naive theories, the abandonment of naive theories according to repetitive experiences and the discovery of inconsistency, the representation of alternative theories, and the abandonment of alternative theories according to repetitive experiences and the discovery of contradictions. On the basis of the results, constructive play has proved to serve a valuable educational function by inducing scientific thinking processes in children. On the basis of this finding, the researcher suggests the need to provide appropriate educational support to teachers.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, P. K., & Nesmith, J. (1996). Blockbusters: Ideas for the block center. Early Childhood Education Journal, 24(2), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353286
  2. An, K., & Kim, S. (2009). Math & science education for young children. Paju: Yangsuhwon.
  3. Baik, E. (2013). Possibility and limitations of the constructive play among four-year-old children: Focused on the meaning of 'Being Strong'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Baik, E. (2014). The process of understanding force as used among two young children in rough-and-tumble play when using combative objects. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 35(5), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.5723/KJCS.2014.35.5.63
  5. Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in schools (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
  6. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. (1998). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Kim, O. H., & Park, E. H. (translation). Seoul: Ewha Womans University Press. (Original published in 1996)
  7. Drew, W. F., Christie, J., Johnson, J. E., Meckley, A. M., & Nell, M. L. (2008). Constructive play: A value-added strategy for meeting early learning standards. Young Children, 63(4).
  8. Forman, G., & Hill, F. (1984). Constructive play: Applying Piaget in the preschool. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  9. Forman, G., & Landry, C. (1999). Research on early science education. In L. R. Williams (Series Ed.) & C. Seefeldt (Ed.), The early childhood curriculum: A review of current research (3rd ed., pp. 133-158). New York: Teachers College Press.
  10. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
  11. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego: Academic Press.
  12. Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B., Rogoff & J. Lave(Eds), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 117-138). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  13. Isenberg, J. P., & Jalongo, M. R. (2001). Creative expression and play in early childhood. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  14. Jo, B., & Choi, J. (1999). The teacher's role that affect scientific thinking of children: Focusing on the case of material changes in deployment activities. The education of Children, 1, 146-162.
  15. Johnson, J. E., Christie, J. F., & Wardle, F. (2006). Play, development, and early education. Lee, J. H., Son, W. K., An, H. J., & Yu, Y. O. (translation). Seoul: Academi Press. (Original published in 2005)
  16. Jung, M., & Hwang, H. (2010). Analysis of change in scientific concept and attitude of preschoolers according to scaffolding in the teaching-learning process of the early childhood science class. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 14(5), 315-348.
  17. Kim, C. (2005). A phenomenological viewpoint on the cognitive functions of imagination. Art Education Review. 26, 83-120.
  18. Kim, K. (2003). A study on constructive play of young children: Focused on playing with Unit Blocks. Unpublished master's thesis, The Catholic university of Korea, Bucheon, Korea.
  19. Kim, K., & Nah, K. (2013). An analysis of teacher and children co-constructing understanding through explanation during free choice activities. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 33(1), 191-214.
  20. Kim, S. (2008). Study on the aspects of child's scientific thinking by teachers' questioning. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Korea.
  21. Koo, H. (1996). A study on the development of young children's constructive play: An analysis of play quality. Unpublished master's thesis, Dongduck Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  22. Kostelnik, M. J., Soderman, A. K., & Whiren, A. P. (2011). Developmentally appropriate curriculum: Best practices in early childhood education. Boston: Pearson Education.
  23. Kwak, H. (1998). Implications of Piaget's theory in early science education. Early childhood education research & review, 2(2), 185-216.
  24. Kwak, H. (2002). Childhood science teaching for conceptual change from the constructivist perspectives. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 6(1), 87-109.
  25. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. Oxon: Routledge.
  26. Oh, M. (2011). Early childhood classroom discourse as a cognitive activity on the social plane. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 16(3). 129-156.
  27. Oliver, S. J., & Klugman, E. (2003). Play and learning day by day. Child Care Information Exchange, 149, 62-65.
  28. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children science. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Publishers.
  29. Park, J. (2007). A study on the relationship between the quality of constructive play and problem solving and on variables related to the quality of constructive play. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
  30. Park, J., & Han, S. (2011). A study on the differences of quality of constructive play according to the proceeding patterns of constructive clay play. Korean Journal of Child Education and Care, 11(3), 127-149.
  31. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in children. New York: Norton.
  32. Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
  33. Shawn, M. G., Russell, H. Y., & Bruce, K. B. (2000). The psychology of learning science. Gwon, S. G., & Im, C. H. (translation). Seoul: Sigmapress. (Original published in 1991)
  34. Sheridan, M. D. (1999). Play in early childhood: From birth to six years. Revised and updated by Jackie Harding and Liz Meldon-Smith. London: Routledge.
  35. Sluss, D. J. (2006). Supporting play: birth through age eight. Kim, M. S., Park, S. Y., Choi, M. S., Choi, E. M. (translation). Seoul: Pakhaksa. (Original published in 2005)
  36. Smilansky, S. (1968). The effects of sociodramatic play on disadvantaged preschool children. New York: Wiley.
  37. Song, J. (2003). Constructivist science education and the map of students' physics misconceptions. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 42(2), 87-109.
  38. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  39. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  40. Tegano, D. W., Lookabaugh, S., May, G. E., & Burdette, M. P. (1999). Constructive play and problem solving: The role of structure and time in the classroom. Early child development and care, 68, 27-35.
  41. Woodard, C., & Davitt, R. (1999). Physical science in early childhood. Cho, E., Ha, S., & Choi, I. (translation). Seoul: Changjisa. (Original published in 1987)
  42. Yang, I. (2003). The role of prior knowledge and scientific thinking in the generating process scientific knowledge. Research of Elementary Education Curriculum, 4, 51-65.
  43. Yoo, K. (2000). Analysis of differences formed from playdough activities based on constructivism as a scientific concept, processing skills and attitudes of young children according to methods of construction. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 4(1), 175-197.