DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

[Retracted]Improving Performance of Foam Proportioner Utilizing Metering Venturi Type

[논문철회]미터링 벤츄리를 이용한 포소화약제 혼합장치의 성능개선

  • Received : 2015.04.29
  • Accepted : 2015.06.10
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

In this study, we have evaluated whether the mixing ratio is proper by creating a mixing device for foam proportioner that mainly is employed in practice utilizing a metering venturi type. In case of the mixing ratio for 3%, water under pressure of 76 mm in diameter and the original liquid of a foam fire extinguishing agent of 31.75 mm in diameter have showed up the fluctuation rate just as much as 3.1~3.5% of the mixing ratio. Because water under pressure of 101.6 mm in diameter and the original liquid of a foam fire extinguishing agent of 38.1 mm in diameter have showed up 3.3~3.7% of the fluctuation rate, water under pressure of 101.6 mm in diameter and the original liquid of a foam fire extinguishing agent of 38.1 mm in diameter have satisfied 3.0~3.9% of performance criterion. And also, in case of the 6% of mixture rate, water under pressure of 76.2 mm in diameter and the original liquid of a foam fire extinguishing agent of 31.75 mm in diameter have showed up the fluctuation rate just as much as 6.4~6.8% of the mixing ratio. Because water under pressure of 101.6 mm in diameter and the original liquid of a foam fire extinguishing agent of 38.1 mm in diameter have showed up 6.0~6.8% of the fluctuation rate, water under pressure of 101.6 mm in diameter and the original liquid of a foam fire extinguishing agent of 38.1 mm in diameter have satisfied 6.0~7.0% of performance criterion.

이 연구는 기존의 미터링 오리피스보다 유량계수가 작은 미터링 벤츄리를 이용하여 포소화약제 혼합장치를 실무에서 주로 사용하는 직경으로 제작하여 혼합비가 적정한지를 평가한 연구로써 3%용 혼합비의 경우 가압수 직경 76.2 mm(포원액 직경 31.75 mm)는 3.1~3.5%의 혼합비의 변화를 나타내었고, 가압수 직경 101.6 mm(포원액 직경 38.1 mm)는 3.3~3.7%의 변화를 나타내어 포소화약제혼합장치등의 성능인증 및 제품검사의 기술기준인 3.0~3.9%를 만족하는 것을 알 수 있었다. 6% 혼합비의 경우 가압수 직경 76.2 mm는 6.4~6.8%의 혼합비의 변화를 나타내었고, 가압수 직경 101.6 mm는 6.25~6.5%의 변화를 나타내어 포소화약제혼합장치등의 성능인증 및 제품검사의 기술기준인 6.0~7.0%를 만족하는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Foam Proportioner and also Technological Standards for Product Inspection Article 2 No. 1, Notification No. 2015-45 of Ministry of Public Safety and Security (2015).
  2. J. H. Ku, "A Study on Foam Mixing Characteristics in Steady steady to Enhance the Performance of Proportioner for Foam System", Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 63-68 (2009).
  3. J. H. Ku, C. S. Baek, J. Y. Park, B. G. Na and H. J. Park, "A Experimental Study on the Foam Mixing Characteristics of Proportioner for Foam System", Proceedings of Fall Annual Conference, Korean Institute of Fire Science & Engineering, pp. 217-224 (2003).
  4. J. W. Lee, W. S. Lim and D. H. Rie, "A Study on B Class Fire Extinguishing Performance of Air Ratio in the Compressed Air Foam System", Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 8-14 (2013).
  5. S. H. Joo, M. T. Lim, H. W. Kim and H. S. Kong, "The Methods to Improve the In-Line Eductor", Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 275 (2011).
  6. S. H. Joo, M. T. Lim, H. W. Kim and H. S. Kong, "The Methods to Improve the In-Line Eductor", Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 280-281 (2011).
  7. Foam Proportioner and also Technological Standards for Product Inspection Article 10, Notification No. 2015-45 of Ministry of Public Safety and Security (2015).